Nanocrystal segmentation in scanning precession electron diffraction data

被引:19
|
作者
Bergh, T. [1 ]
Johnstone, D. N. [2 ]
Crout, P. [2 ]
Hogas, S. [1 ]
Midgley, P. A. [2 ]
Holmestad, R. [1 ]
Vullum, P. E. [1 ,3 ]
Van Helvoort, A. T. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Phys, Hogskoleringen 5, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Mat Sci & Met, Cambridge, England
[3] SINTEF Ind, Dept Mat & Nanotechnol, Trondheim, Norway
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Nanoparticles; non-negative matrix factorization; open-source; scanning precession electron diffraction; virtual dark-field imaging; watershed segmentation; ORIENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/jmi.12850
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
Scanning precession electron diffraction (SPED) enables the local crystallography of materials to be probed on the nanoscale by recording a two-dimensional precession electron diffraction (PED) pattern at every probe position as a dynamically rocking electron beam is scanned across the specimen. SPED data from nanocrystalline materials commonly contain some PED patterns in which diffraction is measured from multiple crystals. To analyse such data, it is important to perform nanocrystal segmentation to isolate both the location of each crystal and a corresponding representative diffraction signal. This also reduces data dimensionality significantly. Here, two approaches to nanocrystal segmentation are presented, the first based on virtual dark-field imaging and the second on non-negative matrix factorization. Relative merits and limitations are compared in application to SPED data obtained from partly overlapping nanoparticles, and particular challenges are highlighted associated with crystals exciting the same diffraction conditions. It is demonstrated that both strategies can be used for nanocrystal segmentation without prior knowledge of the crystal structures present, but also that segmentation artefacts can arise and must be considered carefully. The analysis workflows associated with this work are provided open-source. Lay Description Scanning precession electron diffraction is an electron microscopy technique that enables studies of the local crystallography of a broad selection of materials on the nanoscale. The technique involves the acquisition of a two-dimensional diffraction pattern for every probe position in an area of the sample. The four-dimensional dataset collected by this technique can typically comprise up to 500 000 diffraction patterns. For nanocrystalline materials, it is common that single diffraction patterns contain signals from overlapping crystals. To process such data, we use nanocrystal segmentation, where a representative diffraction pattern is constructed for each individual crystal, together with a real space image showing its morphology and location in the data. This reduces the dimensionality of the data and allows unmixing of signals from overlapping crystals. In this work, we demonstrate two methods for nanocrystal segmentation, one based on creating virtual dark-field images, and one based on unsupervised machine learning. A model system of partly overlapping nanoparticles is used to demonstrate the segmentation, and a demanding case for segmentation is highlighted, where some crystals are not discernible based on their diffraction patterns. To obtain a more complete nanocrystal segmentation, we add an image segmentation routine to both methods, and we discuss benefits and limitations of the two methods. The demonstration data and the used code are provided open-source, so that it can be used by everyone for analysis of nanocrystalline materials or as a starting point for further development of nanocrystal segmentation in scanning precession electron diffraction data.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 167
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measurement of three-dimensional intensity data in electron diffraction by the precession technique
    Berg, BS
    Hansen, V
    Midgley, PA
    Gjonnes, J
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 1998, 74 (03) : 147 - 157
  • [32] Crystal structure solution via precession electron diffraction data: The BEA algorithm
    Cascarano, Giovanni Luca
    Giacovazzo, Carmelo
    Carrozzini, Benedetta
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2010, 111 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [33] Electron coherent diffraction tomography of a nanocrystal
    Dronyak, Roman
    Liang, Keng S.
    Tsai, Jin-Sheng
    Stetsko, Yuri P.
    Lee, Ting-Kuo
    Chen, Fu-Rong
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2010, 96 (22)
  • [34] SCANNING ELECTRON DIFFRACTION
    GRIGSON, CWB
    VACUUM, 1966, 16 (05) : 253 - &
  • [35] Solving oxide structures by precession electron diffraction
    Klein, Holger
    Rageau, Amelie
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2008, 64 : C217 - C217
  • [36] Precession electron diffraction 1: multislice simulation
    Own, C. S.
    Marks, L. D.
    Sinkler, W.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2006, 62 : 434 - 443
  • [37] Models for simplified treatment of precession electron diffraction
    Sinkler, Wharton
    Own, Christopher S.
    Ciston, James
    Marks, Laurence D.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2008, 64 : C76 - C77
  • [38] Precession electron diffraction:: Observed and calculated intensities
    Oleynikov, P.
    Hovmoller, S.
    Zou, X. D.
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2007, 107 (6-7) : 523 - 533
  • [39] Estimation of dislocation density from precession electron diffraction data using the Nye tensor
    Leff, A. C.
    Weinberger, C. R.
    Taheri, M. L.
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2015, 153 : 9 - 21
  • [40] Improving orientation mapping by enhancing the diffraction signal using Auto-CLAHE in precession electron diffraction data
    Wang, Ainiu L.
    Hansen, Marcus H.
    Lai, Yi-Cheng
    Dong, Jiaqi
    Xie, Kelvin Y.
    MICROSTRUCTURES, 2023, 3 (04):