Multiple sclerosis and neurocysticercosis:: A diagnostic dilemma

被引:2
|
作者
Rodríguez-Uranga, JJ [1 ]
Uclés-Sánchez, AJ [1 ]
López-Muñoz, MM [1 ]
Serrano-Cabrera, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio, Serv Neurol, Seville, Spain
关键词
diagnostic criteria; multiple sclerosis; neurocysticercosis;
D O I
10.33588/rn.3809.2003640
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. Both multiple sclerosis (MS) and neurocysticercosis (NC) are two entities in which clinical manifestations, neuroimaging findings and immunoserologic assays are neither pathognomonic nor specific requiring for their diagnosis an accurate examination of the clinical history of patients and an adequate follow-up. Case reports. Two patients who consulted non neurologists about focal neurological symptoms. Neuroimaging findings revealed multiple lesions, some of them contrast-enhanced. A diagnosis of neurocysticercosis was established, supported in one of the patients by positive serologic assays for cysticerci and antihelmintic therapy began to be administered. Observing the clinical evolution of the patients, monitoring their clinical history and considering the diagnostic criteria proposed by McDonald for MS and by Del Brutto for NC the patients were finally diagnosed of MS. Conclusion. The first step to reach a diagnosis of MS is to consider such a possibility. The diagnosis is mainly based on clinical grounds and it is necessary to prove that symptoms disseminate or that alterations occur in neuroimaging findings both in time and space. It is of the utmost importance to establish a differential diagnosis with other conditions presenting with similar clinical manifestations, neuroimaging findings and cerebrospinal fluid tests results. Even with the latest criteria proposed for the diagnosis of MS and NC we may have doubts making it fundamental to cautiously interpret the clinical manifestations and tests results.
引用
收藏
页码:832 / 836
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The chicken or the egg dilemma: intestinal dysbiosis in multiple sclerosis
    Ochoa-Reparaz, Javier
    Magori, Krisztian
    Kasper, Lloyd H.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (06)
  • [42] DIAGNOSIS AND DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
    WUTHRICH, R
    KAPPELI, F
    SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1969, 99 (41) : 1460 - &
  • [43] New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis
    Petereit, HF
    Heiss, WD
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2002, 51 (04) : 533 - 534
  • [44] DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    CRAWFORD, M
    HASSAM, AG
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 1 (5955): : 456 - 456
  • [45] DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    SHENTON, BK
    FIELD, EJ
    JENSSEN, HL
    KOHLER, H
    GUNTHER, J
    MEYERRIE.H
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1974, 4 (5944): : 590 - 591
  • [46] The evolving diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis
    Maria Trojano
    Nature Reviews Neurology, 2011, 7 : 251 - 252
  • [47] Evolution of diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis
    Joanna, Przybek
    Inga, Gniatkowska
    Dagmara, Mirawska-Guzel
    Anna, Czionkowska
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2015, 49 (05) : 313 - 321
  • [48] The evolving diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis
    Trojano, Maria
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2011, 7 (05) : 251 - 252
  • [49] New diagnostic criteria in multiple sclerosis
    Mauch, E
    NERVENHEILKUNDE, 2005, 24 (04) : 263 - 268
  • [50] Multiple sclerosis - etiology and diagnostic potential
    Kaminska, Joanna
    Koper, Olga M.
    Piechal, Kinga
    Kemona, Halina
    POSTEPY HIGIENY I MEDYCYNY DOSWIADCZALNEJ, 2017, 71