Diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in relation to pregnancy outcome

被引:26
|
作者
de Sereday, MS
Damiano, MM
González, CD
Bennett, PH
机构
[1] Argentine Diabet Soc, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Pedro Fiorito Hosp, Endocrinol & Diabet Unit, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Buenos Aires, Dept Pharmacol, Sch Med, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] NIH, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
gestational diabetes; diagnostic criteria; macrosomia; cut-off points; predictive value;
D O I
10.1016/S1056-8727(02)00173-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine which of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) or World Health Organization (WHO) plasma glucose criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) best predicts poor fetal outcome. To determine whether an alternative cut-off point would result in increased predictive value and greater diagnostic effectiveness in pregnancies at high risk for GDM. Research design and methods: A sample of 473 successive apparently normal pregnant women attending the Obstetric Department were screened for GDM using both the ADA and the WHO criteria. Between 26 and 30 weeks of gestation, they underwent, on subsequent days, a screening test with a 50-g oral glucose load and two oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) with 75 and 100 g of glucose according to the WHO and the ADA recommendations, respectively. From this group, we identified 99 women at high risk for GDM, who did not attend their pregnancy follow-up and whose delivery records were recovered at our hospital or in neighbouring hospitals. This unusual situation enabled us to study the natural history and outcome of their pregnancy in spite of not receiving special management usually provided to such women. As macrosomia was expected to be the most frequent undesirable foetal outcome, sensitivity and specificity calculations have been based on this outcome. Results: The study population (n = 99) had a median parity of two and 14% had abnormal results in the 2-h, 75-g load test (WHO) vs. 6% in the 100-g test (ADA). Optimal cut-off points for each test were lower than those recommended for diagnosis by the ADA and the WHO. The optimal sensitivity for the 1-h, 50-g test was 66.7% (cut-off 137 mg/dl), and for the 2-h, 75-g test (cut-off 119 mg/dl). The best specificity and positive predictive value was for this last test with a cut-off point of 140 mg/dl in the second hour. Conclusions: The standard 2-h cut-off value of 140 mg/dl for the 75-g test, as now recommended by WHO, was optimal for predicting macrosomia. Based on the sensitivity and specificity for macrosomia, the 1-h, 50-g screening test had an optimal cut-off point of 137 mg/dl (vs. 140 mg/dl recommended by ADA). The 2-h, 75-g OGTT value using a cut-off point of 119 mg/dl had equivalent sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. In contrast, the 100-g OGTT had much lower levels of sensitivity, but higher specificity and higher positive predictive value. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 119
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pregnancy outcome in a population of women with gestational diabetes
    Cefalo, R
    Jacques, D
    Stanziano, G
    Bulatao, I
    Carlson, E
    DIABETES, 2000, 49 : A442 - A442
  • [42] THE EFFECT OF ESTABLISHED AND GESTATIONAL DIABETES ON PREGNANCY OUTCOME
    JOHNSTONE, FD
    NASRAT, AA
    PRESCOTT, RJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 97 (11): : 1009 - 1015
  • [43] Determinants of pregnancy outcome in patients with gestational diabetes
    Nasrat, H
    Fageeh, W
    Abalkhail, B
    Yamani, T
    Ardawi, MSM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1996, 53 (02) : 117 - 123
  • [44] Erratum to: Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy (DIP): the prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus using new diagnostic criteria
    E. P. O’Sullivan
    G. Avalos
    M. W. O’Reilly
    M. C. Dennedy
    G. Gaffney
    F. Dunne
    Diabetologia, 2016, 59 : 873 - 873
  • [45] Adverse pregnancy outcomes among women in Norway with gestational diabetes using three diagnostic criteria
    Rai, Anam Shakil
    Sletner, Line
    Jenum, Anne Karen
    Overby, Nina Cecilie
    Stafne, Signe Nilssen
    Qvigstad, Elisabeth
    Pripp, Are Hugo
    Sagedal, Linda Reme
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07):
  • [46] Investigation on the suitability of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus in China
    Shang, M.
    Lin, L.
    Ma, L.
    Yin, L.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 34 (02) : 141 - 145
  • [47] Pregnancy outcomes of women with gestational diabetes based on the WHO 2013 and the NICE 2015 diagnostic criteria
    Kun, A.
    Tomoczky, J.
    Sudar, Z.
    Kerenyi, Z.
    Tabak, A. G.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2016, 59 : S48 - S48
  • [48] Diagnostic Accuracy of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India with Carpenter–Coustan and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Correlation with Fetomaternal Outcome
    Pikee Saxena
    Tanya Shubham
    Manju Puri
    Anju Jain
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2022, 72 : 154 - 159
  • [49] Pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to the Carpenter-Coustan criteria in Thailand
    Luengmettakul, Jiraporn
    Sunsaneevithayakul, Prasert
    Talungchit, Pattarawalai
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (09) : 1345 - 1351
  • [50] Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) - do the number of fulfilled diagnostic criteria predict the perinatal outcome?
    Zareba-Szczudlik, Julia
    Pykalo-Gawinska, Dominika
    Stepien, Anna
    Gawinski, Cieszymierz
    Dobrowolska-Redo, Agnieszka
    Malinowska-Polubiec, Aneta
    Romejko-Wolniewicz, Ewa
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2018, 89 (07) : 381 - 387