Technical considerations of the different approaches to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: An analysis of 500 cases

被引:0
|
作者
Ramshaw, BJ [1 ]
Tucker, JG [1 ]
Duncan, TD [1 ]
Heithold, D [1 ]
Garcha, I [1 ]
Mason, EM [1 ]
Wilson, JP [1 ]
Lucas, GW [1 ]
机构
[1] GEOGIA BAPTIST MED CTR,DEPT SURG,ATLANTA,GA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Between April 1991 and April 1994, 500 laparoscopic herniorrhaphies have been performed at our institution. The transabdominal preperitoneal approach was used for 290 repairs, and the total extraperitoneal approach was used for 210 repairs. Although both repairs resulted in acceptable recurrence and complication rates, we adopted the total extraperitoneal approach in June 1993, with a resulting lower recurrence rate (0.5% versus 2.1%) and lower complication rate (3.1% versus 11.1%) when compared with the transabdominal approach. In this retrospective review, four epigastric vessel injuries (1.6%) and one bowel obstruction from a port hernia (0.5%) were attributed to the lateral port placement in the transabdominal approach. There were also two visceral injuries (1.0%) from entering the abdominal cavity in the transabdominal approach. The one visceral injury (0.6%) in the total extraperitoneal approach was a result of the balloon dissection in a patient with multiple previous lower abdominal operations. Better exposure and lateral visualization of the extraperitoneal space has led to less incidence of nerve injury (0.0% versus 2.4%) and a lower recurrence rate (0.5% versus 2.1%) in the total extraperitoneal approach. The total extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy compares favorably to the transabdominal approach in our institution. The improved results may have been due to the technical differences between these approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 72
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Safety of two common laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy approaches: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Hung, Tsung-Yu
    Wu, Chien-Chih
    Chen, Li-Siou
    Kang, Yi-No
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (05) : 2007 - +
  • [42] Concomitant Laparoscopic Renal Surgery and Cholecystectomy: Outcomes and Technical Considerations
    Tsivian, Alexander
    Konstantinovsky, Alex
    Tsivian, Matvey
    Kyzer, Shlomo
    Ezri, Tiberiu
    Stein, Avi
    Sidi, A. Ami
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (11) : 1839 - 1842
  • [44] Avoiding biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical considerations
    M. P. Callery
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2006, 20 : 1654 - 1658
  • [45] Laparoscopic retroperitoneal nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis: Technical considerations.
    Challacombe, B. J.
    Sahai, A.
    Murphy, D.
    Dasgupta, P.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A345 - A345
  • [46] Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of primary and metastaticliver tumors Technical considerations
    A. Siperstein
    A. Garland
    K. Engle
    S. Rogers
    E. Berber
    A. String
    A. Foroutani
    T. Ryan
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2000, 14 : 400 - 405
  • [47] Simplifying laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technical considerations for reproducible outcomes
    Orvieto, MA
    Chien, GW
    Tolhurst, SR
    Rapp, DE
    Steinberg, GD
    Mikhail, AA
    Brendler, CB
    Shalhav, AL
    UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (05) : 976 - 980
  • [48] PELVIC KIDNEY ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY: TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    Au, Daniel
    Duchene, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E687 - E688
  • [49] Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: Its role and some controversial technical considerations
    Kijvikai, K
    Patcharatrakul, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) : 206 - 210
  • [50] Technical Considerations in Laparoscopic-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography
    Mace, Eric H.
    Yachimski, Patrick S.
    Tan, Marcus C.
    Smith, Michael C.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2024, 90 (09) : 2305 - 2307