Stroop interference associated with efficient reading fluency and prelexical orthographic processing

被引:3
|
作者
Mano, Quintino R. [1 ]
Williamson, Brady J. [1 ]
Pae, Hye K. [2 ]
Osmon, David C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Psychol, 47 Corry Blvd,Edwards 1 Bldg,Suite 5130C, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Sch Educ, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
Stroop; word reading; automaticity; executive functioning; orthography; rapid automatized naming; AUTOMATIZED NAMING RAN; DISTRACTOR FREQUENCY; WORD; PARADIGM; TASK; DISABILITIES; DYSLEXIA; COLOR; SOUND; MYTH;
D O I
10.1080/13803395.2015.1107029
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Stroop Color-Word Test involves a dynamic interplay between reading and executive functioning that elicits intuitions of word reading automaticity. One such intuition is that strong reading skills (i.e., more automatized word reading) play a disruptive role within the test, contributing to Stroop interference. However, evidence has accumulated that challenges this intuition. The present study examined associations among Stroop interference, reading skills (i.e., isolated word identification, grapheme-to-phoneme mapping, phonemic awareness, reading fluency) measured on standardized tests, and orthographic skills measured on experimental computerized tasks. Among university students (N = 152), correlational analyses showed greater Stroop interference to be associated with (a) relatively low scores on all standardized reading tests, and (b) longer response latencies on orthographic tasks. Hierarchical regression demonstrated that reading fluency and prelexical orthographic processing predicted unique and significant variance in Stroop interference beyond baseline rapid naming. Results suggest that strong reading skills, including orthographic processing, play a supportive role in resolving Stroop interference.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 283
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Word reading fluency: A transfer appropriate processing account of fluency transfer
    Sandra Lyn Martin-Chang
    Betty Ann Levy
    Reading and Writing, 2006, 19 : 517 - 542
  • [22] On the role of set when reading aloud: A dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing
    Paulitzki, Jeffrey R.
    Risko, Evan F.
    O'Malley, Shannon
    Stolz, Jennifer A.
    Besner, Derek
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2009, 18 (01) : 135 - 144
  • [23] Word reading fluency: A transfer appropriate processing account of fluency transfer
    Martin-Chang, Sandra Lyn
    Levy, Betty Ann
    READING AND WRITING, 2006, 19 (05) : 517 - 542
  • [24] Children with reading difficulties show differences in brain regions associated with orthographic processing during spoken language processing
    Desroches, Amy S.
    Cone, Nadia E.
    Bolger, Donald J.
    Bitan, Tali
    Burman, Douglas D.
    Booth, James R.
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1356 : 73 - 84
  • [25] Reading ability and the use of context in orthographic information processing
    Assink, E
    Bos, AA
    Kattenberg, G
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 157 (04): : 381 - 396
  • [26] Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability
    Taft, M
    LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2001, 44 : 351 - 376
  • [27] Cognitive control in children - Stroop interference and suppression of word reading
    Bub, DN
    Masson, MEJ
    Lalonde, CE
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (04) : 351 - 357
  • [28] Reading Automaticity is Negatively Related to Stroop Interference for Adults with RD
    Andrews, P.
    McGregor, S.
    Golden, C.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 27 (06) : 679 - 680
  • [29] Orthographic analysis of words during fluency training promotes reading of new similar words
    Berends, Inez E.
    Reitsma, Pieter
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2007, 30 (02) : 129 - 139
  • [30] The Role of Morphological Awareness and Orthographic Awareness in Reading Comprehension in Arabic: Do Reading Fluency and Working Memory Count?
    Smail, Layes
    Mahmoud, Gharaibeh
    Adel, Djeribiai
    READING PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 46 (01) : 1 - 42