The Role of the Unaffected Hemisphere in Motor Recovery After Stroke

被引:88
|
作者
Riecker, Axel [1 ]
Groeschel, Klaus [2 ]
Ackermann, Hermann [3 ]
Schnaudigel, Sonja [2 ]
Kassubek, Jan [1 ]
Kastrup, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Neurol, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Neurol, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, Hertie Inst Clin Brain Res, Dept Gen Neurol, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
stroke; reorganization; fMRI; FINGER MOVEMENTS; CONTRALESIONAL HEMISPHERE; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; CEREBRAL ACTIVATION; CORTICAL ACTIVATION; PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS; HAND MOVEMENTS; REORGANIZATION; CORTEX; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.20914
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The contribution of the ipsilateral (nonaffected) hemisphere to recovery of motor function after stroke is controversial. Under the assumption that functionally relevant areas within the ipsilateral motor system should be tightly coupled to the demand we used fMRI and acoustically paced movements of the right index finger at six different frequencies to define the role of these regions for recovery after stroke. Eight well-recovered patients with a chronic striatocapsular infarction of the left hemisphere were compared with eight age-matched participants. As expected the hemodynamic response increased linearly with the frequency of the finger movements at the level of the left supplementary motor cortex (SMA) and the left primary sensorimotor cortex (SMC) in both groups. In contrast, a linear increase of the hemodynamic response with higher tapping frequencies in the right premotor cortex (PMC) and the right SMC was only seen in the patient group. These results support the model of an enhanced bihemispheric recruitment of preexisting motor representations in patients after subcortical stroke. Since all patients had excellent motor recovery contralesional SMC activation appears to be efficient and resembles the widespread, bilateral activation observed in healthy participants performing complex movements, instead of reflecting maladaptive plasticity. Hum Brain Mapp 31:1017-1029, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1017 / 1029
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Imaging Motor Recovery After Stroke
    Yozbatiran N.
    Cramer S.C.
    [J]. NeuroRX, 2006, 3 (4): : 482 - 488
  • [22] Recovery of motor function after stroke
    Sharma, Nikhil
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2012, 54 (03) : 254 - 262
  • [23] Driving Motor Recovery After Stroke
    Richards, Lorie
    Hanson, Carolyn
    Wellborn, Melinda
    Sethi, Amit
    [J]. TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2008, 15 (05) : 397 - 411
  • [24] Do changes in oxygen metabolism in the unaffected cerebral hemisphere underlie early neurological recovery after stroke? A positron emission tomography study
    Iglesias, S
    Marchal, G
    Rioux, P
    Beaudouin, V
    Hauttement, JL
    delaSayette, V
    LeDoze, F
    Derlon, JM
    Viader, F
    Baron, JC
    [J]. STROKE, 1996, 27 (07) : 1192 - 1199
  • [25] Role of the Contralesional vs. Ipsilesional Hemisphere in Stroke Recovery
    Dodd, Keith C.
    Nair, Veena A.
    Prabhakaran, Vivek
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
  • [26] The role of the right hemisphere in post-stroke language recovery
    Schlaug, Gottfried
    Norton, Andrea
    Marchina, Sarah
    [J]. STROKE, 2008, 39 (02) : 542 - 543
  • [27] Motor recovery after stroke: The role of overground exoskeletons in shaping brain plasticity
    Calabro, R. S.
    Naro, A.
    Russo, M.
    Balletta, T.
    Buda, A.
    Carioti, L.
    Bramanti, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 513 - 513
  • [28] Computerized analysis of motor recovery after stroke
    Nelles, G
    Cramer, SC
    Schaechter, JD
    Kaplan, JD
    Finklestein, SP
    [J]. STROKE, 1997, 28 (01) : 194 - 194
  • [29] Mechanisms of motor recovery after stroke.
    Chollet, F
    Loubinoux, I
    Carel, C
    Marque, P
    Albucher, JF
    Guiraud-Chaumeil, B
    [J]. REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 1999, 155 (09) : 718 - 724
  • [30] Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke
    Stinear, Cathy
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2010, 9 (12): : 1228 - 1232