Background evolution in camouflage systems: A predator-prey/pollinator-flower game

被引:19
|
作者
Abbott, Kevin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Psychol Neurosci & Behav, Anim Behav Grp, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词
Background matching; Game Theory; Signal Detection Theory; PHYMATA-AMERICANA MELIN; SPIDER MISUMENA-VATIA; CRAB-SPIDERS; DISRUPTIVE COLORATION; HABITAT SELECTION; CRYPTIC COLORATION; PREY INTERACTIONS; AMBUSH PREDATORS; MIMICRY; CRYPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.09.001
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A common predator or anti-predator strategy involves camouflage based on background matching. In some systems, the background is an organism whose fitness is affected by the predator-prey interaction. In these cases, the phenotype of the background species may evolve to affect the degree of background matching in the predator-prey interaction. For example, some flower species (the background) are inhabited by camouflaged ambush predators that attack visiting pollinators. These flowers have a fitness interest in the outcome of the predator-prey interaction because flowers depend on pollinator visitations for reproduction. Therefore, floral colour might evolve relative to predator colour so as to influence the detectability of resident predators. I have created a three-player game, based on Signal Detection Theory, to model the co-evolution of predator and prey/pollinator behavioural strategies with floral colour. This model makes two general predictions: (1) Constraints on predator distributions favour the evolution of flowers that match the predators' colour because they prevent predators from overexploiting these flowers; (2) factors that produce less discriminating pollinators also favour the evolution of flowers that match the predators' colour because these pollinators are willing to land on these flowers even if the safety of the flower is in doubt. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 678
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EVOLUTIONARY INSTABILITY IN PREDATOR-PREY SYSTEMS
    MARROW, P
    CANNINGS, C
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1993, 160 (02) : 135 - 150
  • [32] Predator group size distributions in predator-prey systems
    Wang, Xueting
    Pan, Qiuhui
    Kang, Yibin
    He, Mingfeng
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2016, 26 : 117 - 127
  • [33] Wave propagation in predator-prey systems
    Fu, Sheng-Chen
    Tsai, Je-Chiang
    NONLINEARITY, 2015, 28 (12) : 4389 - 4423
  • [34] THE ECONOMICS OF HARVESTING PREDATOR-PREY SYSTEMS
    STROBELE, WJ
    WACKER, H
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE, 1995, 61 (01): : 65 - 81
  • [35] Modelling prey in discrete time predator-prey systems
    Mullan, Rory
    Glass, David H.
    McCartney, Mark
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2013), 2013, : 2617 - 2622
  • [36] A GAME-THEORETIC MODEL OF PREDATOR-PREY SIGNALING
    VEGAREDONDO, F
    HASSON, O
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1993, 162 (03) : 309 - 319
  • [37] Availability of prey resources drives evolution of predator-prey interaction
    Friman, Ville-Petri
    Hiltunen, Teppo
    Laakso, Jouni
    Kaitala, Veijo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 275 (1643) : 1625 - 1633
  • [38] Different strategies of evolution in a predator-prey system
    Droz, M
    Pekalski, A
    PHYSICA A, 2001, 298 (3-4): : 545 - 552
  • [39] Distributed predator-prey co-evolution
    Cohen, Y
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2003, 5 (06) : 819 - 834
  • [40] The evolution of predator-prey interactions: Theory and evidence
    Abrams, PA
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 2000, 31 : 79 - 105