Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists Likely Increase Mortality in Critical Care: An Updated Meta-Analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Lee, Todd C. [1 ,2 ]
Wilson, Marnie Goodwin [3 ]
Lawandi, Alexander [4 ]
McDonald, Emily G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Clin Practice Assessment Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Res Inst, Dept Med, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat CORE,Hlth Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] NIH, Dept Crit Care Med, Clin Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2021年 / 134卷 / 03期
关键词
Critical care; Histamine-2 receptor antagonists; Mortality; Proton pump inhibitors; Stress ulcer prophylaxis;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.08.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is common among the critically ill. Recently, the Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) vs. Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers for Ulcer Prophylaxis Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit (PEPTIC) trial suggested PPIs might increase mortality. We performed an updated meta-analysis to further inform discussion. METHODS: We leveraged 2 recent systematic reviews to identify randomized controlled trials directly comparing PPIs and H-2 Receptor Antagonists (H2RAs) for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients and reporting mortality. We extracted mortality data from each study and meta-analyzed them with the PEPTIC trial using a random effects model. RESULTS: Of 28,559 total patients, 14,436 (50.5%) were allocated to PPI and 14,123 to H2RAs (49.5%). Compared to H2RAs, the pooled relative risk for mortality was 1.05 (95% confidence interval 1.00-1.10) with an estimated risk difference for mortality of 9 additional deaths per 1000 patients exposed to PPI (95% confidence interval 0-18); heterogeneity was low (I-2 = 0%; P = 0.826). CONCLUSIONS: Stress ulcer prophylaxis with PPIs likely increases mortality compared to H2RAs. Whether stress ulcer prophylaxis is beneficial in critical care remains open to further study. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E184 / E188
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus Histamine 2 Receptor Antagonists for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically III Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    Alenezi, Farhan
    Jaeschke, Roman Z.
    Moayyedi, Paul
    Cook, Deborah J.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (03) : 693 - 705
  • [22] Proton pump inhibitors vs Histamine-2 receptor antagonists and risk of mortality in critically ill patients - a pilot analysis of multi-institutional study
    Hsieh, Hsing-Chun
    Lin, Tsung-Hsuan
    Lee, Mei-Chuan
    Su, Hui-Chen
    Shao, Shih-Chieh
    Su, Chien-Chou
    Lai, Edward Chia-Cheng
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 : 577 - 578
  • [23] Do Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists and Proton Pump Inhibitors Really Have No Effect on the Gastric Emptying Rate?
    Tomita, Toshihiko
    Miwa, Hiroto
    JOURNAL OF NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2011, 17 (04) : 434 - 434
  • [24] Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus Histamine 2 Receptor Antagonists for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis
    Sadaka, Farid
    Trottier, Steven
    Smith, Timothy
    VanSlette, Jeffrey
    Kasal, Jan
    Palagiri, Ashok
    Subramanian, Sanjay
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (12)
  • [25] Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists Are Associated With Hip Fractures Among At-Risk Patients
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Kubo, Ai
    Zhao, Wei
    Quesenberry, Charles
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 139 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [26] Observational cohort study: safety outcomes in children using proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists
    Houben, Eline
    Johansson, Saga
    Nagy, Peter
    Penning-van Beest, Fernie J. A.
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Herings, Ron M. C.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2018, 34 (04) : 577 - 583
  • [27] Proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists for the prevention of recurrences of erosive reflux esophagitis: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Harris, RA
    Kuppermann, M
    Richter, JE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 92 (12): : 2179 - 2187
  • [28] Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus Histamine-2-Receptor Antagonists for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
    Deliwala, Smit S.
    Hamid, Kewan
    Goyal, Hemant
    Ponnapalli, Anoosha
    Zayed, Yazan
    Bala, Areeg
    Lakshman, Harini
    Malladi, Shrikanth
    Jones, Shane
    Santana, Maria
    Leon, Brianna
    An, Minh T.
    Chawla, Saurabh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 56 (03) : 204 - 217
  • [29] Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of histamine-2 receptor antagonists as prophylaxis for gastrointestinal bleeding in intensive care unit patients
    Cokro, Fonny
    Sumartono, Juliana
    PHARMACY EDUCATION, 2022, 22 (02): : 113 - 117
  • [30] Comparison of the Hospital-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection Risk of Using Proton Pump Inhibitors versus Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Stress Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Azab, Mohamed
    Doo, Loomee
    Doo, Daniel H.
    Elmofti, Yousif
    Ahmed, Muazer
    Cadavona, John Jay
    Liu, Xibei B.
    Shafi, Amaan
    Joo, Moon Kyung
    Yoo, Ji Won
    GUT AND LIVER, 2017, 11 (06) : 781 - 788