Hyperflexion and Femoral Interference Screw Insertion in ACL Reconstruction

被引:2
|
作者
Steiner, Mark E. [1 ,2 ]
Wing, David [1 ,2 ]
Walley, Kempland C. [1 ]
Manoukian, Ohan [1 ]
Perez-Viloria, Miguel [1 ]
Okajima, Stephen [1 ]
Nazarian, Ara [1 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Ctr Adv Orthopaed Studies, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] New England Baptist Hosp, Sports Sect, Dept Orthoped Surg, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
interference screw; fixation; divergence; anterior cruciate ligament; ACL; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL FIXATION; GRAFT FIXATION; TIBIAL TUNNEL; DIVERGENCE; PLACEMENT; BONE; STRENGTH; ANGLES;
D O I
10.1177/2325967118788810
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions produced with flexible reamers and no knee hyperflexion, it is unknown whether knee hyperflexion is necessary for femoral interference screw insertion. Purpose: To compare femoral screw-graft divergence in anatomic ACL reconstructions with endoscopic interference screws placed without knee hyperflexion and with the use of flexible versus rigid screwdrivers. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten matched pairs of cadaveric knees had bone-tendon-bone graft ACL reconstructions with anatomic femoral tunnels. The knees were flexed to 90 degrees. Femoral interference screws (7 x 20 mm) were placed in pairs of knees: in 1 knee with a flexible screwdriver and in the opposite knee with a rigid screwdriver. Graft-screw divergence was imaged with computed tomography scans and tested with cyclic and static biomechanical tests. Results: The mean screw-graft divergence was 12.07 degrees 4.04 degrees with the rigid screwdriver and 10.68 degrees 3.23 degrees with the flexible screwdriver (P = .35). The cyclic tests with screws placed by a rigid screwdriver had a mean increase in displacement of 0.56 +/- 0.20 mm. For screws placed with the flexible screwdriver, the mean increase in displacement was 0.58 +/- 0.32 mm (P = .66). Yield load was 393.3 +/- 95.1 N for screws placed by a rigid screwdriver and 408.2 +/- 119.0 N for screws inserted with the flexible screwdriver (P = .78). Maximum load was 523.1 +/- 88.7 N for screws placed by a rigid screwdriver and 467.1 +/- 107.3 N for screws inserted with the flexible screwdriver (P = .09). Conclusion: With either a rigid or a flexible screwdriver, there were no significant effects on screw divergence or fixation strength. Clinical Relevance: Knees can be kept at 90 degrees during endoscopic femoral interference screw insertion. The use of a traditional rigid or flexible screwdriver will not affect screw-graft divergence or fixation strength.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quadrupled Semitendinosus ACL Reconstruction Combining Cortical Button in Femur and Interference Screw in Tibia
    Pablo Martinez-Cano, Juan
    Marcela Zamudio-Castilla, Laura
    Andres Cuadros-Potes, Janio
    Catalina Ibarra-Mosquera, Laura
    Manuel Mejia-Lopez, Fernando
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2020, 9 (01): : E9 - E14
  • [22] Comparison between a novel human cortical bone screw and bioabsorbable interference screw for graft fixation of ACL reconstruction
    Shen, X. -Z.
    Qu, F.
    Li, C. -B.
    Qi, W.
    Lu, X.
    Li, H. -L.
    Guo, Q.
    Wang, J. -T.
    Zhao, G.
    Liu, Y. -J.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 : 111 - 118
  • [23] Metallic or bioabsorbable interference screw for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction?
    Papalia, Rocco
    Vasta, Sebastiano
    D'Adamio, Stefano
    Giacalone, Antonino
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 109 (01) : 19 - 29
  • [24] BIOMECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF METALLIC AND BIOABSORBABLE INTERFERENCE SCREW FOR TIBIAL GRAFT FIXATION IN ACL RECONSTRUCTION
    Ocampo More, Ari Digiacomo
    Almeida Pizzolatti, Andre Luiz
    Fancello, Eduardo
    de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2013, PT B, 2014,
  • [25] MRI evaluation of the tibial tunnel/screw/tendon interface after ACL reconstruction using a bioabsorbable interference screw
    Singhal, Manuj C.
    Holzhauer, Markus
    Powell, David
    Johnson, Darren L.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 31 (06) : 575 - 579
  • [26] ACL stump and ACL femoral landmarks are equally reliable in ACL reconstruction for assisting ACL femoral tunnel positioning
    Liu, Weijie
    Wu, Yumei
    Wang, Xiaopeng
    Kuang, Shida
    Su, Chao
    Xiong, Yilin
    Tang, Hang
    Xiao, Yifan
    Gao, Shuguang
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2023, 31 (01) : 219 - 228
  • [27] ACL stump and ACL femoral landmarks are equally reliable in ACL reconstruction for assisting ACL femoral tunnel positioning
    Weijie Liu
    Yumei Wu
    Xiaopeng Wang
    Shida Kuang
    Chao Su
    Yilin Xiong
    Hang Tang
    Yifan Xiao
    Shuguang Gao
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 219 - 228
  • [28] Resorbable screw and sheath versus resorbable interference screw and staples for ACL reconstruction: a comparison of two tibial fixation methods
    Christian Carulli
    Fabrizio Matassi
    Stefano Soderi
    Luigi Sirleo
    Giovanni Munz
    Massimo Innocenti
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 1264 - 1271
  • [29] Femoral Tunnel Placement in ACL Reconstruction
    Liu, T. Thomas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (10): : NP1 - NP1
  • [30] Resorbable screw and sheath versus resorbable interference screw and staples for ACL reconstruction: a comparison of two tibial fixation methods
    Carulli, Christian
    Matassi, Fabrizio
    Soderi, Stefano
    Sirleo, Luigi
    Munz, Giovanni
    Innocenti, Massimo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (04) : 1264 - 1271