High- versus low-energy extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for myofascial pain syndrome of upper trapezius A prospective randomized single blinded pilot study

被引:38
|
作者
Park, Ki Deok [1 ]
Lee, Woo Yong [2 ]
Park, Min-ho [3 ]
Ahn, Jae Ki [3 ]
Park, Yongbum [3 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Gil Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil Med, Coll Med, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Sanggye Paik Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Sanggye Paik Hosp, 1342 Dongil Ro, Seoul 139707, South Korea
关键词
energy level; ESWT; myofascial pain syndrome; upper trapezius; CHRONIC PLANTAR FASCIITIS; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; NERVE-FIBERS; ESWT; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000011432
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the efficacy of high-and low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the upper trapezius. Methods: Thirty patients (3 men, 27 women) were randomly assigned to receive either high-energy ESWT (0.210mJ/mm(2)) or low-energy ESWT (0.068mJ/mm(2)). Both groups received 1500 pulses of ESWT once a week, for 2 weeks. Outcome measurement was assessed by verbal numeric pain scale (VNS), neck disability index (NDI), neck range of motion (ROM) (flexion, extension, rotation, lateral bending), and pressure threshold (PT). Statistical analysis was performed with significance level of P<. 05. Results: No statistically significant differences of demographic and clinical characteristics existed between the 2 groups. VNS, NDI, neck ROM (rotation to sound side, lateral bending to affected side, lateral bending to sound side), and PT were improved in both groups. In contrast, statistically significant improvements in neck flexion and neck extension were observed only in the high-energy group. We also found significant differences in post-treatment NDI (4.20 +/- 1.78 vs 6.47 +/- 2.48) and post-treatment neck flexion ROM (65.47 +/- 10.09 vs 55.93 +/- 11.07) between high-energy and low-energy group. Conclusion: ESWT effectively improves VNS, NDI, neck ROM, and PT to patients with MPS of the upper trapezius. High-energy ESWT was more effective in improving NDI and neck flexion ROM compared to the low-energy ESWT, suggesting superiority in functional improvement. Further studies are required to specify the effect of ESWT by energy intensity.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Low-energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Improves Microcirculation Blood Flow of Ischemic Limbs in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: Pilot Study
    Tara, Shuhei
    Miyamoto, Masaaki
    Takagi, Gen
    Kirinoki-Ichikawa, Sonoko
    Tezuka, Akito
    Hada, Tomohito
    Takagi, Ikuyo
    JOURNAL OF NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2014, 81 (01) : 19 - 27
  • [42] Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on scar pain in burn patients A prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Cho, Yoon Soo
    Joo, So Young
    Cui, Huisong
    Cho, Sung-Rae
    Yim, Haejun
    Seo, Cheong Hoon
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (32)
  • [43] High energy focused shock wave therapy accelerates bone healing A blinded, prospective, randomized canine clinical trial
    Kieves, N. R.
    MacKay, C. S.
    Adducci, K.
    Rao, S.
    Goh, C.
    Palmer, R. H.
    Duerr, F. M.
    VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2015, 28 (06) : 425 - 432
  • [44] Low-energy pulsed electromagnetic field therapy reduces pain in fibromyalgia: A randomized single-blind controlled pilot study
    Giovale, Massimo
    Novelli, Lucia
    Persico, Luca
    Motta, Francesca
    Rampoldi, Stefano
    Galli, Rossana
    Monteforte, Patrizia
    Doveri, Marica
    Bianchi, Gerolamo
    Selmi, Carlo
    Bottaro, Luigi Carlo
    RHEUMATOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 3 (02): : 77 - 83
  • [45] The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Pain Intensity and Neck Disability for Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Neck and Shoulder A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jun, Ji Hyun
    Park, Geun-Young
    Chae, Choong Sik
    Suh, Dong-Churl
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2021, 100 (02) : 120 - 129
  • [46] Response to "Letter to the Editor Regarding 'Comparing Myofascial Pain Syndrome Treatment with Dry Needling Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis on Pain and Function of the Heel'"
    Dede, Burak Tayyip
    Ada, Aysenur
    Oguz, Muhammed
    Bulut, Berat
    Bagcier, Fatih
    Aytekin, Ebru
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2024, 63 (06): : 786 - 786
  • [47] Prospective randomized single-blinded controlled clinical vial of percutaneous neuromodulation pain therapy device versus sham for the osteoarthritic knee: A pilot study
    Kang, Richard W.
    Lewis, Paul B.
    Kramer, Adam
    Hayden, Jennifer K.
    Cole, Brian J.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 30 (06) : 439 - 445
  • [48] Physical therapy versus radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized-controlled study
    Saglam, Gonca
    Alisar, Dilek Cetinkaya
    Ozen, Selin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 68 (01): : 126 - 135
  • [49] Comparison of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and wrist-extensor splint application in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomized controlled study
    Aydin, Abdulkadir
    Atic, Ramazan
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 11 : 1459 - 1467
  • [50] Comparison of the efficiency of combined extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and triple therapy versus triple therapy itself in Category III B chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS)
    Pajovic, B.
    Radojevic, N.
    Dimitrovski, A.
    Vukovic, M.
    AGING MALE, 2016, 19 (03): : 202 - 207