Genetic chances in clinically organ-confined prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization

被引:29
|
作者
Fu, WT
Bubendorf, L
Willi, N
Moch, H
Mihatsch, MJ
Sauter, G
Gasser, TC
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Urol Clin, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Inst Pathol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00722-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. The genetic basis underlying prostate cancer development and progression is poorly understood. The primary aim of this study was to identify chromosomal regions important for progression in clinically localized prostate cancer removed by radical prostatectomy. Methods. Comparative genomic hybridization was used for whole genome screening of DNA sequence copy number alterations in 28 pathologically organ-confined tumors (pT2) and 28 tumors with infiltration of the seminal vesicles (pT3b). Results. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed on average 2.0 +/- 2.4 chromosomal alterations per tumor with move frequent losses (mean 1.3 +/- 1.8) than gains (mean 0.7 +/- 1.0). The percentage of tumors without alterations was higher in Stage pT2 (21%) than in Stage pT3b (50%). Losses of 8p (21%), 13q (21%), 5q (14%), 16q (14%), and 18q (13%) and gains of Xq (21%) and 8q (9%) were the most prevalent changes. Distinct regional alterations included minimal overlapping regions of loss at 5q13-q21, 6q14-q21, and 18q21-qter. There was only a small increase in the number of alterations from Stage pT2 to Stage pT3b (mean 1.6 +/- 2.3 versus 2.5 +/- 2.4). However, two individual alterations-gain of 8q and loss of 18q-were significantly more frequent in Stage pT3b than in Stage pT2 prostate cancer (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively), suggesting that genes in these regions may be important for prostate cancer progression. Conclusions. The detection of chromosome 8q gains and 18q losses and the identification of the corresponding target genes could become a molecular tool for better characterization of clinically localized prostate cancer. UROLOGY 56: 880-885, 2000. (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 885
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer
    Shumway, Richard
    Grew, David
    Colasanto, Joseph
    Patrick, Laura
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 98 (02): : E24 - E24
  • [22] Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease
    Miyake, H
    Sakai, I
    Harada, K
    Hara, I
    Eto, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 12 (03) : 270 - 274
  • [23] Treatment of clinically organ confined prostate cancer
    McLeod, DG
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1999, 33 : 35 - 39
  • [24] Radical radiation therapy options for organ-confined prostate cancer
    Plowman, PN
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 87 (05) : 431 - +
  • [25] Genetic changes in familial prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization
    Rökman, A
    Koivisto, PA
    Matikainen, MP
    Kuukasjärvi, T
    Poutiainen, M
    Helin, HJ
    Karhu, R
    Kallioniemi, OP
    Schleutker, J
    PROSTATE, 2001, 46 (03): : 233 - 239
  • [26] Role of brachytherapy with permanent implants in organ-confined prostate cancer
    Mohandessi, B
    Schneider, W
    Altwein, JE
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 1999, 30 (04) : 223 - 230
  • [27] Recurrence after radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer
    Scheepe, JR
    Vis, AN
    Mickisch, GH
    ONKOLOGIE, 2003, 26 (04): : 330 - 333
  • [28] Erectile function following external beam radiotherapy for clinically organ-confined or locally advanced prostate cancer
    Hisasue, S
    Kato, R
    Takahashi, A
    Masumori, N
    Itoh, N
    Miyao, N
    Takatsuka, K
    Yanase, M
    Oouchi, A
    Hareyama, M
    Tsukamnoto, T
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 34 (05) : 269 - 273
  • [29] Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume predicts tumor biology of clinically organ-confined prostate cancer
    Arai, Y
    Okubo, K
    Terada, N
    Matsuta, Y
    Egawa, S
    Kuwao, S
    Ogura, K
    PROSTATE, 2001, 46 (02): : 134 - 141
  • [30] Matrix Metalloproteinases and Angiogenic Factors Predictors of Survival after Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
    Boxler, Silvan
    Djonov, Valentin
    Kessler, Thomas M.
    Hlushchuk, Ruslan
    Bachmann, Lucas M.
    Held, Ulrike
    Markwalder, Regula
    Thalmann, George N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2010, 177 (05): : 2216 - 2224