Production-data analysis of single-phase (gas) coalbed-methane wells

被引:74
|
作者
Clarkson, C. R. [1 ]
Bustin, R. M.
Seidle, J. P.
机构
[1] ConocoPhillips Canada, Geosci & Reservoir Engn Assistance Team, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Earth & Ocean Sci, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] MHA Petr Consultants, Denver, CO USA
关键词
D O I
10.2118/100313-PA
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Coalbed-methane (CBM) reservoirs commonly exhibit two-phase-flow (gas plus water) characteristics; however, commercial CBM production is possible from single-phase (gas) coal reservoirs, as demonstrated by the recent development of the Horseshoe Canyon coals of western Canada. Commercial single-phase CBM production also occurs in some areas of the low-productivity Fruitland Coal, south-southwest of the high-productivity Fruitland Coal Fairway in the San Juan basin, and in other CBM-producing basins of the continental United States. Production data of single-phase coal reservoirs may be analyzed with techniques commonly applied to conventional reservoirs. Complicating application, however, is the unique nature of CBM reservoirs; coal gas-storage and -transport mechanisms differ substantially from conventional reservoirs. Single-phase CBM reservoirs may also display complex reservoir behavior such as multilayer characteristics, dual-porosity effects, and permeability anisotropy. The current work illustrates how single-well production-data-analysis (PDA) techniques, such as type curve, flowing material balance (FMB), and pressure-transient (PT) analysis, may be altered to analyze single-phase CBM wells. Examples of how reservoir inputs to the PDA techniques and subsequent calculations are modified to account for CBM-reservoir behavior are given. This paper demonstrates, by simulated and field examples, that reasonable reservoir and stimulation estimates can be obtained from PDA of CBM reservoirs only if appropriate reservoir inputs (i.e., desorption compressibility, fracture porosity) are used in the analysis. As the field examples demonstrate, type-curve, FMB, and PT analysis methods for PDA are not used in isolation for reservoir-property estimation, but rather as a starting point for single-well and multiwell reservoir simulation, which is then used to history match and forecast CBM-well production (e.g., for reserves assignment). CBM reservoirs have the potential for permeability anisotropy because of their naturally fractured nature, which may complicate PDA. To study the effects of permeability anisotropy upon production, a 2D, single-phase, numerical CBM-reservoir simulator was constructed to simulate single-well production assuming various permeability-anisotropy ratios. Only large permeability ratios (> 16:1) appear to have a significant effect upon single-well production characteristics. Multilayer reservoir characteristics may also be observed with CBM reservoirs because of vertical heterogeneity, or in cases where the coals are commingled with conventional (sandstone) reservoirs. In these cases, the type-curve, FMB, and PT analysis techniques are difficult to apply with confidence. Methods and tools for analyzing multilayer CBM (plus sand) reservoirs are presented. Using simulated and field examples, it is demonstrated that unique reservoir properties may be assigned to individual layers from commingled (multilayer) production in the simple two-layer case.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 331
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gas Seepage Rule and Productivity Analysis in Designing Coalbed Methane Wells
    Fei Liu
    Zhifeng Luo
    Zhengku Wang
    Pingli Liu
    [J]. Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils, 2015, 50 : 516 - 524
  • [22] Density-Based Production-Data Analysis of Gas Wells With Significant Rock-Compressibility Effects
    Zhang, Miao
    Ayala, Luis F.
    [J]. SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2015, 18 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [23] An experimental study on gas/liquid/solid three-phase flow in horizontal coalbed methane production wells
    Wang, Dongying
    Wang, Zhiming
    Zeng, Quanshu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 174 : 1009 - 1021
  • [24] The Use of a Novel Spacer and UltralowDensity Cement System To Control Lost Circulation in Coalbed-Methane Wells
    Wang, Chengwen
    Wang, Ruihe
    Zhou, Weidong
    Li, Fei
    [J]. SPE DRILLING & COMPLETION, 2015, 30 (01) : 76 - 85
  • [25] Type curves for production prediction of coalbed methane wells
    Xu, Bing-Xiang
    Li, Xiang-Fang
    Hu, Xiao-Hu
    Hu, Su-Ming
    [J]. Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2011, 40 (05): : 743 - 747
  • [26] Multiscale Model of Poromechanics and Transport Problems in Coalbed-Methane Including Adsorption Gas Effects
    Le, T. D.
    Moyne, C.
    Murad, M. A.
    Panfilova, I.
    [J]. POROMECHANICS VI: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH BIOT CONFERENCE ON POROMECHANICS, 2017, : 497 - 506
  • [27] Hydraulic fracturing for improved nutrient delivery in microbially-enhanced coalbed-methane (MECBM) production
    Zhi, Sheng
    Elsworth, Derek
    Wang, Jiehao
    Gan, Quan
    Liu, Shimin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 60 : 294 - 311
  • [28] Dynamic production characteristics and effect analysis of combined gas production well of coalbed methane and tight gas
    Cheng Leli
    Zhao Shaoze
    Yin Senlin
    Chen Gongyang
    Chen Ling
    Xiong Ting
    [J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2022, 12 : 397 - 407
  • [29] Dynamic production characteristics and effect analysis of combined gas production well of coalbed methane and tight gas
    Cheng Leli
    Zhao Shaoze
    Yin Senlin
    Chen Gongyang
    Chen Ling
    Xiong Ting
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (02) : 397 - 407
  • [30] Different adsorbed gas effects on the reservoir parameters and production in coalbed methane extraction by multibranch horizontal wells
    Li, Qixian
    Xu, Jiang
    Peng, Shoujian
    Yan, Fazhi
    Zhang, Chaolin
    Han, Ende
    [J]. ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (04): : 1370 - 1385