Understanding the role of Fischer-Tropsch reaction kinetics in techno-economic analysis for co-conversion of natural gas and biomass to liquid transportation fuels

被引:8
|
作者
Sahir, Asad H. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yanan [1 ]
Tan, Eric C. D. [1 ]
Tao, Ling [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Biorefinery Anal & Exploratory Res, Natl Bioenergy Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Ropar, India
来源
关键词
techno-economic analysis; gas-to-liquid; biomass; Fischer-Tropsch; gasification; renewable jet fuel; bioenergy; natural gas; co-conversion; PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; GASIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; TECHNOLOGY; OPTIONS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.2035
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
With the increased availability of low-cost natural gas, the co-conversion of natural gas and biomass-to-liquid fuels has attracted attention from industry due to its potential for improving liquid fuel yields while lowering greenhouse gas emissions. This study provides an understanding of Fischer-Tropsch kinetics, improvements in processing strategies for hydrocarbon production, and of its impact on cost for the co-conversion of natural gas and biomass-to-transportation fuels. Studies that investigate the effect of Fischer-Tropsch reaction kinetics on techno-economic analysis can be used to develop process models that consider reaction stoichiometry and account for the effect of the paraffin-to-olefin ratio. We consider two processing scenarios: (1) one that does not employ a hydrocracker, and (2) the other where a hydrocracker serves as an integral part of the process scheme. Our analysis shows that co-processing natural gas not only facilitates the economic benefits of converting biomass-to-liquid fuels but also facilitates flexibility in process integration. The resulting minimum fuel selling price ranged from $2.47-$3.47/GGE (gallon gasoline equivalent) without the hydrocracker and ranged from $2.17-$3.60/GGE with the inclusion of the hydrocracker, for a 50 million GGE hydrocarbon fuel production facility and for varying blending ratios for biomass from 0-100% with natural gas. The hydrocracker helps to increase the production of diesel and jet fuels substantially, with carbon efficiencies of 50% attained for a chain growth probability of 0.87. The cost penalty comes from the capital expenses of the hydrocracker, and the expense may not be offset with hydrocarbon yield improvement. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1306 / 1320
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [21] Techno-economic analysis of bio-oil co-processing with vacuum gas oil to transportation fuels in an existing fluid catalytic cracker
    Wu, Le
    Wang, Yuqi
    Zheng, Lan
    Wang, Peiyu
    Han, Xiaolong
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 197
  • [22] Synthetic natural gas (SNG) production by biomass gasification with CO2 capture: Techno-economic and life cycle analysis (LCA)
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    Dragan, Mihaela
    Petrescu, Letitia
    Cormos, Ana-Maria
    Dragan, Simion
    Bathori, Arthur-Maximilian
    Galusnyak, Stefan-Cristian
    [J]. Energy, 2024, 312
  • [23] Techno-Economic Evaluation of Jet Fuel Production via an Alternative Gasification-Driven Biomass-to-Liquid Pathway and Benchmarking with the State-of-the-Art Fischer-Tropsch and Alcohol-to-Jet Concepts
    Detsios, Nikolaos
    Maragoudaki, Leda
    Rebecchi, Stefano
    Quataert, Koen
    De Winter, Karel
    Stathopoulos, Vassilis
    Orfanoudakis, Nikolaos G.
    Grammelis, Panagiotis
    Atsonios, Konstantinos
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (07)