Comparative efficacy and safety of preserved versus preservative-free beta-blockers in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Skov, Anne Guldhammer [1 ]
Rives, Amalie Santaolalla [2 ]
Freiberg, Josefine [2 ]
Virgili, Gianni [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto [5 ]
Kolko, Miriam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp Glostrup, Dept Ophthalmol, Glostrup, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Drug Design & Pharmacol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Firenze, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Child Hlth NEURO, Florence, Italy
[4] AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
[5] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
beta-blockers; efficacy; glaucoma; intraocular pressure; ocular hypertension; safety; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; FREE OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION; GEL-FORMING SOLUTION; BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE; FREE TAFLUPROST; LIFETIME RISK; TIMOLOL; LATANOPROST; TOLERABILITY; INFLAMMATION;
D O I
10.1111/aos.14926
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Preservative-free topical medications have been introduced for glaucoma care to reduce ocular adverse events associated with preservatives. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of beta-blockers, or combination using beta-blockers, with and without preservatives. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were examined. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ocular and systemic side effects, and other clinical and quality of life outcomes. Of 242 records identified, seven RCTs (1125 patients) were included. The follow-up period ranged from one to 12 months. Timolol was used in five studies, and two studies used a combination (timolol with bimatoprost or dorzolamide). The difference in mean change (MD) in IOP between the preservative-free and the preserved drugs was statistically significant but not clinically relevant: (MD 0.29 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.51 mmHg, p = 0.010; moderate-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse events: Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcome was low or very low and reported in few studies. No significant difference was observed on ocular surface symptoms. Tear break-up time (TBUT) was better with preservative-free drops (p < 0.001). Schirmer's test was better in the preservative-free group (p < 0.001). Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcomes was low or very low. There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. We found no clinically relevant difference in mean change in IOP between the preserved and the preservative-free treatments. Data on adverse events used different methods and were incompletely reported. Although some measures of ocular surface health favoured preservative-free medications, more evidence is needed. The increasing use of preservative-free drops may be associated with better ocular surface and tolerability, but strong evidence from RCTs would be welcome.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 261
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and safety of preservative-free anti-glaucomatous eye drops (dorzolamide/timolol) in ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma
    Lazreg, Sihem
    Assaf, Ahmed Hassan
    Abdelrahman, Ahmed M.
    Hosny, Mohamed
    Shaheen, Mohamed Shafik
    Shawky, Medhat Mohamed
    El-Raggal, Tamer Mohamed
    Abou Samra, Waleed Ali Moustafa
    Mostafa, Yehia Salah Eldin
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 45 (01)
  • [22] Interleukin-1β tear concentration in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive patients treated with preservative-free nonselective beta-blockers
    Manni, G
    Centofanti, M
    Oddone, F
    Parravano, M
    Bucci, MG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 139 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [23] IOP-lowering efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free tafluprost 0.0015% among patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma
    Hommer, Anton
    Ramez, Osman Mohammed
    Burchert, Maria
    Kimmich, Friedemann
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (08) : 1905 - 1913
  • [24] HEALTH ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF PRESERVATIVE-FREE TAFLUPROST VERSUS PRESERVED LATANOPROST IN THE TREATMENT OF OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA OR OCULAR HYPERTENSION (OH)
    Makino, K.
    Charles, H.
    Tilden, D.
    Cottrell, S.
    Mudge, M.
    Christova, L.
    Van Bavel, J.
    West, B.
    Woodgate, A. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A643 - A643
  • [25] Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of benzalkonium chloride-preserved, alternatively preserved and preservative-free eyedrops in the treatment of glaucoma
    Kim, Myungjin
    Kim, Young Kook
    Rho, Seungsoo
    Ha, Ahnul
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [26] Comparing the tolerability of preservative-free tafluprost versus preserved latanoprost in the management of glaucoma and ocular hypertension - an observer blinded active-control trial
    Brinkman, David
    McSwiney, Terence
    James, Mark
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 (05) : 2589 - 2595
  • [27] Efficacy of brimonidine 0.2% and dorzolamide 2% as adjunctive therapy to beta-blockers in adult patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension
    Simmons, ST
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (04) : 604 - 619
  • [28] Efficacy and safety evaluation of benzalkonium chloride preserved eye-drops compared with alternatively preserved and preservative-free eyedrops in the treatment of glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hedengran, Anne
    Steensberg, Alvilda T.
    Virgili, Gianni
    Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
    Kolko, Miriam
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 104 (11) : 1512 - 1518
  • [29] Preservative-Free Latanoprost Eye Drops in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma/Ocular Hypertension
    Mark Sanford
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2014, 34 : 521 - 528
  • [30] Tear cytokine profile of glaucoma patients treated with preservative-free or preserved latanoprost
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose M.
    Perez-Bartolome, Francisco
    Urcelay, Elena
    Santiago, Jose L.
    Moreno-Montanes, Javier
    Arriola-Villalobos, Pedro
    Benitez-del-Castillo, Jose M.
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    OCULAR SURFACE, 2017, 15 (04): : 723 - 729