Comparative efficacy and safety of preserved versus preservative-free beta-blockers in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Skov, Anne Guldhammer [1 ]
Rives, Amalie Santaolalla [2 ]
Freiberg, Josefine [2 ]
Virgili, Gianni [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto [5 ]
Kolko, Miriam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp Glostrup, Dept Ophthalmol, Glostrup, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Drug Design & Pharmacol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Firenze, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Child Hlth NEURO, Florence, Italy
[4] AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
[5] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
beta-blockers; efficacy; glaucoma; intraocular pressure; ocular hypertension; safety; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; FREE OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION; GEL-FORMING SOLUTION; BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE; FREE TAFLUPROST; LIFETIME RISK; TIMOLOL; LATANOPROST; TOLERABILITY; INFLAMMATION;
D O I
10.1111/aos.14926
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Preservative-free topical medications have been introduced for glaucoma care to reduce ocular adverse events associated with preservatives. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of beta-blockers, or combination using beta-blockers, with and without preservatives. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were examined. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ocular and systemic side effects, and other clinical and quality of life outcomes. Of 242 records identified, seven RCTs (1125 patients) were included. The follow-up period ranged from one to 12 months. Timolol was used in five studies, and two studies used a combination (timolol with bimatoprost or dorzolamide). The difference in mean change (MD) in IOP between the preservative-free and the preserved drugs was statistically significant but not clinically relevant: (MD 0.29 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.51 mmHg, p = 0.010; moderate-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse events: Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcome was low or very low and reported in few studies. No significant difference was observed on ocular surface symptoms. Tear break-up time (TBUT) was better with preservative-free drops (p < 0.001). Schirmer's test was better in the preservative-free group (p < 0.001). Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcomes was low or very low. There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. We found no clinically relevant difference in mean change in IOP between the preserved and the preservative-free treatments. Data on adverse events used different methods and were incompletely reported. Although some measures of ocular surface health favoured preservative-free medications, more evidence is needed. The increasing use of preservative-free drops may be associated with better ocular surface and tolerability, but strong evidence from RCTs would be welcome.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 261
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of preservative-free latanoprost eyedrops, compared with BAK-preserved latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma
    Rouland, Jean-Francois
    Traverso, Carlo Enrico
    Stalmans, Ingeborg
    El Fekih, Lamia
    Delval, Laurent
    Renault, Didier
    Baudouin, Christophe
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 97 (02) : 196 - 200
  • [2] Efficacy and safety levels of preserved and preservative-free tafluprost are equivalent in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: results from a pharmacodynamics analysis
    Hamacher, Thomas
    Airaksinen, Juhani
    Saarela, Ville
    Liinamaa, M. Johanna
    Richter, Ulrich
    Ropo, Auli
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2008, 86 : 14 - 19
  • [3] Evaluation of toxicity of preservative-free and preserved beta-blockers in a conjunctival cell line
    Debbasch, C
    Saint Jean, MD
    Pisella, PJ
    Rat, P
    Warnet, JM
    Baudouin, C
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (04) : S825 - S825
  • [4] Preservative-free versus preserved latanoprost eye drops in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
    Aptel, Florent
    Choudhry, Reena
    Stalmans, Ingeborg
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2016, 32 (08) : 1457 - 1463
  • [5] Preservative-free versus preserved brimonidine %0.15 preparations in the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: short term evaluation of efficacy, safety, and potential advantages
    Duru, Zeynep
    Ozsaygili, Cemal
    CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 39 (01) : 21 - 24
  • [6] Preserved Versus Preservative-Free Latanoprost for the Treatment of Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Post Hoc Pooled Analysis
    Paul Harasymowycz
    Cindy Hutnik
    Jean-François Rouland
    Francisco J. Muñoz Negrete
    Mario A. Economou
    Philippe Denis
    Christophe Baudouin
    Advances in Therapy, 2021, 38 : 3019 - 3031
  • [7] Preserved Versus Preservative-Free Latanoprost for the Treatment of Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Post Hoc Pooled Analysis
    Harasymowycz, Paul
    Hutnik, Cindy
    Rouland, Jean-Francois
    Negrete, Francisco J. Munoz
    Economou, Mario A.
    Denis, Philippe
    Baudouin, Christophe
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (06) : 3019 - 3031
  • [8] A REVIEW OF PRESERVED AND PRESERVATIVE-FREE PROSTAGLANDIN ANALOGUES FOR THE TREATMENT OF OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA AND OCULAR HYPERTENSION
    Hommer, A.
    DRUGS OF TODAY, 2010, 46 (06) : 409 - 416
  • [9] Ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and preservative-free glaucoma medications
    Jaenen, N.
    Baudouin, C.
    Pouliquen, P.
    Manni, G.
    Figueiredo, A.
    Zeyen, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 17 (03) : 341 - 349
  • [10] Preservative-free tafluprost 0.0015% in the treatment of patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension
    Carl Erb
    Ines Lanzl
    Seid-Fatima Seidova
    Friedemann Kimmich
    Advances in Therapy, 2011, 28