HIGH SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS' AND TEACHERS' PERSPECTIVE OF EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ACTION RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION

被引:0
|
作者
Van-Trung Tran [1 ]
Anh-Chuong Huynh-Lam [2 ,3 ]
Ngoc-Bich Vu-Thi [4 ]
机构
[1] Thu Dau Mot Univ, Off Postgrad Acad Affair, Thu Dau Mot City, Binh Duong Prov, Vietnam
[2] Ho Chi Minh City Univ Educ, Fac Sci Educ, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Thu Dau Mot Univ, Fac Educ, Thu Dau Mot City, Binh Duong Prov, Vietnam
[4] Thu Dau Mot Univ, Fac Management Sci, Thu Dau Mot City, Binh Duong Prov, Vietnam
来源
关键词
Action research; Criteria; Education; Teachers; Administrators; QUALITY;
D O I
10.22633/rpge.v26i00.16085
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Action research becomes an appropriate and effective professional development method and strategy to promote inquiry knowledge and solve the problem that leads to action or change. Teachers participating in action research could gain a better insight into themselves as teachers, be motivated to continuous professional growth, and boost their self-confidence as professionals. The main objective here is to examine high-school administrators' and teachers' perceptions of the necessity of evaluation criteria for pedagogical action research. This research surveyed 255 respondents, including 16 administrators and 239 teachers from high-schools in Binh Duong province, Vietnam, with the 11-item questionnaire. The main finding indicated that all high-school administrators and teachers participating fully agree that novelty, effectiveness, and applicability are necessary criteria to evaluate quality of pedagogical action research in Vietnam. Our study contributes to the general discussion about necessary and appropriate criteria for evaluating the quality of pedagogical action research in Vietnam.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Teachers’ and school administrators’ attitudes and beliefs of teacher evaluation: a preliminary investigation of high poverty school districts
    Linda A. Reddy
    Christopher M. Dudek
    Stephanie Peters
    Alexander Alperin
    Ryan J. Kettler
    Alexander Kurz
    Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2018, 30 : 47 - 70
  • [12] Teachers' and school administrators' attitudes and beliefs of teacher evaluation: a preliminary investigation of high poverty school districts
    Reddy, Linda A.
    Dudek, Christopher M.
    Peters, Stephanie
    Alperin, Alexander
    Kettler, Ryan J.
    Kurz, Alexander
    EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2018, 30 (01) : 47 - 70
  • [13] RESEARCH - ACTION IN TEACHERS' EDUCATION
    Floralba Angulo Abaunza, Maria
    ACTUALIDADES PEDAGOGICAS, 2007, (50): : 33 - 46
  • [14] MERGING RESEARCH AND TEACHING - A HIGH-SCHOOL TEACHERS PERSPECTIVE
    MONTOYA, R
    SILBER, H
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1991, 201 : 238 - CHED
  • [15] Administrators and Teachers? Perceptions of their Quality and Skills in Educational Action Research
    Tran, Van-Trung
    Huynh-Lam, Anh-Chuong
    Vu-Thi, Ngoc-Bich
    PEGEM EGITIM VE OGRETIM DERGISI, 2022, 12 (04): : 200 - 203
  • [16] Evaluation of the Communication Process between School Administrators and Teachers according to Teachers' Opinions
    Dogan, Soner
    Ugurlu, Celal Teyyar
    Yildirim, Tutku
    Karabulut, Erol
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2014, 3 (01): : 34 - 47
  • [17] Key issues on Chilean teacher education from the perspective of teachers and administrators
    Diaz Larenas, Claudio H.
    Solar Rodriguez, Maria I.
    Soto Hernandez, Valentina
    Conejeros Solar, Marianela
    Vergara Morales, Jorge
    REVISTA COMPLUTENSE DE EDUCACION, 2015, 26 (03): : 543 - 569
  • [18] Opinions of High School Administrators on Teachers' Organizational Dissent Behaviors
    Ozdemir, Murat
    KURAM VE UYGULAMADA EGITIM BILIMLERI, 2011, 11 (04): : 1905 - 1908
  • [20] Research on Evaluation Index System of Physical Education Teachers in Middle School
    Shi, Weichao
    Wang, Bowen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS, SOCIAL SCIENCE, ARTS, EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING (ESSAEME 2017), 2017, 119 : 252 - 257