Dilute Betadine Lavage Reduces the Risk of Acute Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:59
|
作者
Calkins, Tyler E. [1 ,2 ]
Culvern, Chris [1 ]
Nam, Denis [1 ]
Gerlinger, Tad L. [1 ]
Levine, Brett R. [1 ]
Sporer, Scott M. [1 ]
Della Valle, Craig J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, 1611 W Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Campbell Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Biomed Engn, Memphis, TN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 02期
关键词
aseptic revision hip arthroplasty; aseptic revision knee arthroplasty; dilute betadine lavage; periprosthetic joint infection; normal saline lavage; POVIDONE-IODINE; WOUND IRRIGATION; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; PREVENTION; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this randomized, controlled trial is to determine whether dilute betadine lavage compared to normal saline lavage reduces the rate of acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in aseptic revision total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A total of 478 patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA and THA were randomized to receive a 3-minute dilute betadine lavage (0.35%) or normal saline lavage before surgical wound closure. Fifteen patients were excluded following randomization (3.1%) and six were lost to follow-up (1.3%), leaving 457 patients available for study. Of them, 234 patients (153 knees, 81 hips) received normal saline lavage and 223 (144 knees, 79 hips) received dilute betadine lavage. The primary outcome was PJI within 90 days of surgery with a secondary assessment of 90-day wound complications. A priori power analysis determined that 285 patients per group were needed to detect a reduction in the rate of PJI from 5% to 1% with 80% power and alpha of 0.05. Results: There were eight infections in the saline group and 1 in the betadine group (3.4% vs 0.4%, P=.038). There was no difference in wound complications between groups (1.3% vs 0%, P=.248). There were no differences in any baseline demographics or type of revision procedure between groups, suggesting appropriate randomization. Conclusion: Dilute betadine lavage before surgical wound closure in aseptic revision TKA and THA appears to be a simple, safe, and effective measure to reduce the risk of acute postoperative PJI. Level of Evidence: Level I. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection is not Inferior to Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Lim, J. B. T.
    Pang, H. N.
    Tay, K. J. D.
    Chia, S. L.
    Yea, S. J.
    Lo, N. N.
    MALAYSIAN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (03) : 73 - 81
  • [32] Difficulty of diagnostic accuracy of periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective analysis of revision surgery of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in a tertiary hospital
    Andres, Alexander Herbert
    Chaold-Loesing, Juliette-Afi
    Bulok, Hendrik
    Willburger, Roland Ernst
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [33] Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Relative to Noninfectious Revisions
    Boddapati, Venkat
    Fu, Michael C.
    Mayman, David J.
    Su, Edwin P.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    McLawhorn, Alexander S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (02): : 521 - 526
  • [34] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
    Christian Hipfl
    Vincent Leopold
    Luis Becker
    Matthias Pumberger
    Carsten Perka
    Sebastian Hardt
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 4481 - 4490
  • [35] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
    Hipfl, Christian
    Leopold, Vincent
    Becker, Luis
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Perka, Carsten
    Hardt, Sebastian
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (07) : 4481 - 4490
  • [36] Relationship between body mass index and the risk of periprosthetic joint infection after primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty
    Zhong, Junlong
    Wang, Bin
    Chen, Yufeng
    Li, Huizi
    Lin, Nan
    Xu, Xianghe
    Lu, Huading
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (07)
  • [37] Preoperative hyponatremia is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty
    Gu, Alex
    Chen, Frank R.
    Chen, Aaron Z.
    Fassihi, Safa C.
    Thakkar, Savyasachi
    Unger, Anthony S.
    Liu, Jiabin
    Sculco, Peter K.
    Ast, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 20 : 224 - 227
  • [38] Increased Risk of Heterotopic Ossification Following Revision Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Manrique, Jorge
    Alijanipour, Pouya
    Heller, Snir
    Dove, Michael
    Parvizi, Javad
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2018, 6 (06): : 486 - 491
  • [39] Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan, Emerito
    Delgado-Martinez, Alberto D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (20)
  • [40] Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
    Kong, Lingde
    Cao, Junming
    Zhang, Yingze
    Ding, Wenyuan
    Shen, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (03) : 529 - 536