Dilute Betadine Lavage Reduces the Risk of Acute Postoperative Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:59
|
作者
Calkins, Tyler E. [1 ,2 ]
Culvern, Chris [1 ]
Nam, Denis [1 ]
Gerlinger, Tad L. [1 ]
Levine, Brett R. [1 ]
Sporer, Scott M. [1 ]
Della Valle, Craig J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, 1611 W Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Campbell Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Biomed Engn, Memphis, TN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 02期
关键词
aseptic revision hip arthroplasty; aseptic revision knee arthroplasty; dilute betadine lavage; periprosthetic joint infection; normal saline lavage; POVIDONE-IODINE; WOUND IRRIGATION; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; PREVENTION; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.011
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this randomized, controlled trial is to determine whether dilute betadine lavage compared to normal saline lavage reduces the rate of acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in aseptic revision total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A total of 478 patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA and THA were randomized to receive a 3-minute dilute betadine lavage (0.35%) or normal saline lavage before surgical wound closure. Fifteen patients were excluded following randomization (3.1%) and six were lost to follow-up (1.3%), leaving 457 patients available for study. Of them, 234 patients (153 knees, 81 hips) received normal saline lavage and 223 (144 knees, 79 hips) received dilute betadine lavage. The primary outcome was PJI within 90 days of surgery with a secondary assessment of 90-day wound complications. A priori power analysis determined that 285 patients per group were needed to detect a reduction in the rate of PJI from 5% to 1% with 80% power and alpha of 0.05. Results: There were eight infections in the saline group and 1 in the betadine group (3.4% vs 0.4%, P=.038). There was no difference in wound complications between groups (1.3% vs 0%, P=.248). There were no differences in any baseline demographics or type of revision procedure between groups, suggesting appropriate randomization. Conclusion: Dilute betadine lavage before surgical wound closure in aseptic revision TKA and THA appears to be a simple, safe, and effective measure to reduce the risk of acute postoperative PJI. Level of Evidence: Level I. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision
    Guillaume Renard
    Jean-Michel Laffosse
    Meagan Tibbo
    Thibault Lucena
    Etienne Cavaignac
    Jean-Louis Rouvillain
    Philippe Chiron
    Mathieu Severyns
    Nicolas Reina
    International Orthopaedics, 2020, 44 : 735 - 741
  • [2] Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision
    Renard, Guillaume
    Laffosse, Jean-Michel
    Tibbo, Meagan
    Lucena, Thibault
    Cavaignac, Etienne
    Rouvillain, Jean-Louis
    Chiron, Philippe
    Severyns, Mathieu
    Reina, Nicolas
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 44 (04) : 735 - 741
  • [3] Dilute Betadine Lavage Before Closure for the Prevention of Acute Postoperative Deep Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Brown, Nicholas M.
    Cipriano, Cara A.
    Moric, Mario
    Sporer, Scott M.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (01): : 27 - 30
  • [4] Low Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Intraosseous Vancomycin
    Christopher, Zachary K.
    Pulicherla, Nidhi
    Iturregui, Jose M.
    Brinkman, Joseph C.
    Spangehl, Mark J.
    Clarke, Henry D.
    Bingham, Joshua S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (08): : S303 - S307
  • [5] The Cost Effectiveness of Dilute Betadine Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Kerbel, Yehuda E.
    Kirchner, Gregory J.
    Sunkerneni, Anisha R.
    Lieber, Alexander M.
    Moretti, Vincent M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (07): : S307 - S311
  • [6] Risk of Instability After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Menken, Luke G.
    Berliner, Zachary P.
    Korshunov, Yevgeniy
    Cooper, H. John
    Hepinstall, Matthew S.
    Scuderi, Giles R.
    Rodriguez, Jose A.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 45 (03) : 145 - +
  • [7] Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: Is an Ipsilateral Uninfected Total Joint Arthroplasty at Risk?
    Karczewski, Daniel
    Salmons, Harold I.
    Thapa, Prabin
    Tande, Aaron J.
    Bedard, Nicholas A.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09): : S425 - S428
  • [8] The Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Klemt, Christian
    Yeo, Ingwon
    Harvey, Michael
    Burns, Jillian C.
    Melnic, Christopher
    Uzosike, Akachimere Cosmas
    Kwon, Young-Min
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (02) : 158 - 166
  • [9] Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
    Quinlan, Nicole D.
    Werner, Brian C.
    Brown, Thomas E.
    Browne, James A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (12): : 3661 - 3667
  • [10] Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
    Becker, Roland
    Clauss, Martin
    Rotigliano, Niccolo
    Hirschmann, Michael Tobias
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 26 (01) : 20 - 33