Selection of Six Sigma project with interval data: common weight DEA model

被引:17
|
作者
Wen, Yao [1 ]
An, Qingxian [1 ]
Xu, Xuanhua [1 ]
Chen, Ya [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Common weight; Interval data; Six Sigma project selection; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENT UNIT; IMPRECISE DATA; MCDM; PERFORMANCE; IMPROVEMENT; FRAMEWORK; EPSILON; POWER; IDEA;
D O I
10.1108/K-07-2017-0250
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to prioritize the most efficient Six Sigma project that can generate the greatest benefit to the organization, according to the relative performance among a set of homogenous projects (in here, DMUs). The selection of a Six Sigma project is a multiple-criteria decision-making problem, which is difficult in practice because the projects are not yet complete and the values of evaluation indicators are often interval or imprecise data. Managers stress the need for developing an effective performance evaluation methodology for selecting a Six Sigma project. Design/methodology/approach - This study proposes a modified model considering interval or imprecise data based on common weight data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach to solve problems on project selection. Findings - By comparing its findings with an example from a previous study, the new model obtained realistic and fair evaluation results and significantly reduced the difficulties and the time spent during calculation. Moreover, not only the best project is identified, but also the exact indicator information is obtained. Originality/value - This study solves the problem of selecting the most efficient Six Sigma project in the preference of interval or imprecise data. Many studies have shown how a Six Sigma project is chosen, but only a few have integrated interval data into the selection process.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1307 / 1324
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Model with Interval Gray Numbers
    Yang, Yin-Sheng
    International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 1998, 9 (04): : 11 - 23
  • [32] Prioritization of Lean Six Sigma project selection criteria using Best Worst Method
    Shukla, Vitthal
    Swarnakar, Vikas
    Singh, A. R.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 47 : 5749 - 5754
  • [33] Customer Requirements Analysis Method in Lean Six Sigma Project Selection Based on RAHP
    Zhao, De-Yong
    Ye, Wei-Min
    Gao, Cui-Juan
    Zhang, Min-Fang
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY, RELIABILITY, RISK, MAINTENANCE, AND SAFETY ENGINEERING (QR2MSE), VOLS I-IV, 2013, : 1224 - 1228
  • [34] Six sigma project generation and selection: literature review and feature based method proposition
    Pinto Conde, Giovanni Claudio
    Martens, Mauro Luiz
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2020, 31 (16) : 1303 - 1312
  • [35] Construction of Six Sigma-based control chart for interval-valued data
    Ravichandran, J.
    Pranavi, K.
    Paramanathan, P.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2024,
  • [36] Common Quality Improvement Methodologies Including the Model for Improvement, Lean, and Six Sigma
    Coughlin, Katherine
    Posencheg, Michael A.
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 50 (02) : 285 - 306
  • [37] Six Sigma project selection using fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making method
    Wei, Chun-Chin
    Cheng, Yung-Lung
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2020, 31 (11-12) : 1266 - 1289
  • [38] A framework for Six Sigma project selection in higher educational institutions, using a weighted scorecard approach
    Holmes, Monica C.
    Jenicke, Lawrence O.
    Hempel, Jessica L.
    QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2015, 23 (01) : 30 - 46
  • [39] Green lean six sigma sustainability - oriented project selection and implementation framework for manufacturing industry
    Kaswan, Mahender Singh
    Rathi, Rajeev
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    Antony, Jiju
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2023, 14 (01) : 33 - 71
  • [40] Improved common weight MCDM model for technology selection
    Karsak, E. Ertugrul
    Ahiska, S. Sebnem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (24) : 6933 - 6944