Selection of Six Sigma project with interval data: common weight DEA model

被引:17
|
作者
Wen, Yao [1 ]
An, Qingxian [1 ]
Xu, Xuanhua [1 ]
Chen, Ya [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Common weight; Interval data; Six Sigma project selection; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENT UNIT; IMPRECISE DATA; MCDM; PERFORMANCE; IMPROVEMENT; FRAMEWORK; EPSILON; POWER; IDEA;
D O I
10.1108/K-07-2017-0250
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to prioritize the most efficient Six Sigma project that can generate the greatest benefit to the organization, according to the relative performance among a set of homogenous projects (in here, DMUs). The selection of a Six Sigma project is a multiple-criteria decision-making problem, which is difficult in practice because the projects are not yet complete and the values of evaluation indicators are often interval or imprecise data. Managers stress the need for developing an effective performance evaluation methodology for selecting a Six Sigma project. Design/methodology/approach - This study proposes a modified model considering interval or imprecise data based on common weight data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach to solve problems on project selection. Findings - By comparing its findings with an example from a previous study, the new model obtained realistic and fair evaluation results and significantly reduced the difficulties and the time spent during calculation. Moreover, not only the best project is identified, but also the exact indicator information is obtained. Originality/value - This study solves the problem of selecting the most efficient Six Sigma project in the preference of interval or imprecise data. Many studies have shown how a Six Sigma project is chosen, but only a few have integrated interval data into the selection process.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1324
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Six Sigma Project Selection Using Interval Neutrosophic TOPSIS
    Otay, Irem
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    [J]. ADVANCES IN FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY 2017, VOL 3, 2018, 643 : 83 - 93
  • [2] Six sigma project selection using data envelopment analysis
    Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, India
    不详
    [J]. TQM Mag., 2007, 5 (419-441):
  • [3] Applying a Hybrid MCDM Model for Six Sigma Project Selection
    Wang, Fu-Kwun
    Hsu, Chen-Hsoung
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 2014
  • [4] Six Sigma project selection methodology
    Ray, Sanjit
    Das, Prasun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2010, 1 (04) : 293 - 309
  • [5] IMPROVED INTERVAL DEA MODELS WITH COMMON WEIGHT
    Sun, Jiasen
    Miao, Yajun
    Wu, Jie
    Cui, Lianbiao
    Zhong, Runyang
    [J]. KYBERNETIKA, 2014, 50 (05) : 774 - 785
  • [6] A Real Option based Six Sigma project evaluation and selection model
    Padhy, R. K.
    Sahu, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (08) : 1091 - 1102
  • [7] Normative Approach to Six Sigma Project Selection
    Al Kindi, Mahmood
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON 2011), 2011, : 189 - 193
  • [8] Selecting Six Sigma project: a comparative study of DEA and LDA techniques
    Hadi-Vencheh, A.
    Yousefi, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2018, 9 (04) : 506 - 522
  • [9] Study on Six Sigma Project Selection Based on ANFIS
    Hu, Tao
    Yuan, Xinhao
    Yao, Jie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION (ICITIA 2015), 2015, : 216 - 231
  • [10] A MADM method for project selection in six sigma management
    Sun, PS
    Fan, ZP
    You, TH
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, 2005, : 357 - 359