Meta-analysis of trials of interventions to improve medication adherence

被引:298
|
作者
Peterson, AM [1 ]
Takiya, L [1 ]
Finley, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci Philadelphia, Philadelphia Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Pharm Adm, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
clinical studies; compliance; methodology; patients;
D O I
10.1093/ajhp/60.7.657
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The effect of tools and methods designed to enhance medication adherence that have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials was studied. A literature search was performed with MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PsychLIT, ERIC, and EMBASE for the period from 1966 to December 2000. Only randomized, controlled trials with at least 10 subjects per intervention group were included. Of 484 articles evaluated, only 61 met the criteria for the meta-analysis. Multiple interventions or study samples were identified in 23 of the articles. Each intervention was counted as a separate study, yielding 95 cohorts totaling 18,922 subjects. Of these subjects, 9,604 (51%) received interventions and 9,318 served as controls. Cohorts reported between 1990 and 1999 accounted for 53% of the sample; 56% of all cohorts were based in physician offices and 26% involved hypertensive patients. Behavioral interventions accounted for 41 cohorts (8,885 subjects), educational interventions for 22 cohorts (6,392 subjects), and combined interventions for 32 cohorts (3,645 subjects). Homogeneity of groupings and effect sizes (ESs) were calculated for each type of intervention. Overall, the data were not homogeneous, so conclusions could not be derived from the entire body of data. The educational intervention and combined intervention cohorts were nonhomogeneous (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively); however, the behavioral intervention cohort was homogeneous Q 42.48, d.f. = 40, p = 0.36). The overall ES for behavioral interventions was 0.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.04-0.09). There were no significant differences among the behavioral interventions. Educational interventions had an overall ES of 0.11 (95% Cl 0.06-0.15); there were no significant differences among the educational interventions. The overall ES of the combined interventions was 0.08 (95% Cl = 0.04-0.12). When stratifying the combined intervention group by type of behavioral intervention, mail reminders had the largest impact (ES = 0.38). Meta-analysis of studies of interventions to improve medication adherence revealed an increase in adherence of 4-11%. No single strategy appeared to be best.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 665
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Kanters, Steve
    Park, Jay J. H.
    Chan, Keith
    Socias, Maria Eugenia
    Ford, Nathan
    Forrest, Jamie I.
    Thorlund, Kristian
    Nachega, Jean B.
    Mills, Edward J.
    [J]. LANCET HIV, 2017, 4 (01): : E31 - E40
  • [42] The Effectiveness of Medication Adherence Interventions Among Patients With Coronary Artery Disease A Meta-analysis
    Chase, Jo-Ana D.
    Bogener, Jennifer L.
    Ruppar, Todd M.
    Conn, Vicki S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2016, 31 (04) : 357 - 366
  • [43] Medication adherence interventions among hypertensive black adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ruppar, Todd M.
    Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline M.
    Mehr, David R.
    Lewis, Lisa
    Conn, Vicki S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 (06) : 1145 - 1154
  • [44] Patient-Centered Outcomes of Medication Adherence Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Conn, Vicki S.
    Ruppar, Todd M.
    Enriquez, Maithe
    Cooper, Pamela S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (02) : 277 - 285
  • [45] Medication adherence in patients with mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of telemedicine interventions
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
    Sharifi, Hamid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2023,
  • [46] Understanding the role of educational interventions on medication adherence in hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ampofo, Ama G.
    Khan, Ehsan
    Ibitoye, Mary B.
    [J]. HEART & LUNG, 2020, 49 (05): : 537 - 547
  • [47] Nurse-Led Interventions To Enhance Medication Adherence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Van Camp, Yoleen P.
    Van Rompaey, Bart
    Elseviers, Monique M.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 21 : 53 - 53
  • [48] The Retraction of a Trial Included in a Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Enhance Oral Medication Adherence Reply
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    de Bruin, Marijn
    Guillaumie, Laurence
    Moisan, Jocelyne
    Gregoire, Jean-Pierre
    Guenette, Line
    Perez, Norma
    Vezina-Im, Lydi-Anne
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (02) : 264 - 266
  • [49] Mobile Apps to Improve Medication Adherence in Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Al-Arkee, Shahd
    Mason, Julie
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Fabritz, Larissa
    Chua, Winnie
    Haque, M. Sayeed
    Jalal, Zahraa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (05)
  • [50] Psychological interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment. Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mora-Castro, Daniela
    Marin-Picado, Bradly
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARIA, 2023, 40 (02): : 97 - 116