Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer

被引:58
|
作者
Ramirez, Pedro T. [1 ]
Schmeler, Kathleen M. [1 ]
Malpica, Anais [2 ]
Soliman, Pamela T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; Radical trachelectomy; Cervical cancer; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; HYSTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.063
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. This study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. We also describe Our Surgical technique. Methods. This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent robotic radical trachelectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy from October 2008 to May 2009. We analyzed our data to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this surgery. Results. This analysis included 4 patients with early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. The median body mass index was 27.1 kg/m(2) (range, 22.7 to 39.1). Three patients had stage IA2 adenocarcinoma; I patient had stage IA1 adenocarcinoma with lymph-vascular space invasion. The median operative time was 339.5 min (range, 245 to 416). The median console time was 282.5 min (range, 217 to 338). The median estimated blood loss was 62.5 nil (range, 50 to 75). There were no conversions to laparotomy. There were no intraoperative complications. No patient required blood transfusion. The median length of hospital stay was 1.5 days (range, I to 2). One patient experienced a postoperative complication, transient left lower extremity sensory neuropathy. No patient had residual tumor ill the trachelectomy specimen, and no patient underwent adjuvant therapy. The median number of pelvic lymph nodes removed was 20 (range, 18 to 27). The median time to a successful voiding trial was 8 days (range, 7 to 9). The median follow-up was 105 days (range, 82 to 217). There were no recurrences. Conclusion. Robotic radical trachelectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy is feasible and safe and should be considered for patients desiring fertility-sparing surgery. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 515
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and safety of cervical conization combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer treatment
    Li, Hui
    Gao, Rui
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 45 (04) : 170 - 176
  • [22] Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Frumovitz, Michael
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 110 (03) : S21 - S24
  • [23] Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study
    Salvo, Gloria
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Leitao, Mario M.
    Cibula, David
    Wu, Xiaohua
    Falconer, Henrik
    Persson, Jan
    Perrotta, Myriam
    Mosgaard, Berit J.
    Kucukmetin, Ali
    Berlev, Igor
    Rendon, Gabriel
    Liu, Kaijiang
    Vieira, Marcelo
    Capilna, Mihai E.
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    Baiocchi, Glauco
    Kaidarova, Dilyara
    Ribeiro, Reitan
    Pedra-Nobre, Silvana
    Kocian, Roman
    Li, Xiaoqi
    Li, Jin
    Palsdottir, Kolbrun
    Noll, Florencia
    Rundle, Stuart
    Ulrikh, Elena
    Hu, Zhijun
    Gheorghe, Mihai
    Saso, Srdjan
    Bolatbekova, Raikhan
    Tsunoda, Audrey
    Pitcher, Brandelyn
    Wu, Jimin
    Urbauer, Diana
    Pareja, Rene
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01)
  • [24] Systematic comparison of radical vaginal trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer
    Han, Ling
    Yang, Xiao-Yun
    Zheng, Ai
    Wang, Li
    Chu, Yan-Xia
    Wang, Yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 112 (02) : 149 - 153
  • [25] Fertility after radical trachelectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer
    Hertel, H
    Possover, M
    Krause, N
    Kühne-Heid, R
    Schneider, A
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2001, 61 (03) : 117 - 120
  • [26] Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy Is an Alternative to Laparotomy With Improved Perioperative Outcomes in Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Kucukmetin, Ali
    Biliatis, Ioannis
    Ratnavelu, Nithya
    Patel, Amit
    Cameron, Iain
    Ralte, Angela
    Naik, Raj
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (01) : 135 - 140
  • [27] Safe Criteria for Less Radical Trachelectomy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Clinicopathologic Study
    Kim, Hee Seung
    Choi, Chel Hun
    Lim, Myong-Chul
    Chang, Suk-Joon
    Kim, Yong Beom
    Kim, Min A.
    Kim, Tae-Jin
    Park, Sang-Yoon
    Kim, Byoung-Gie
    Song, Yong Sang
    Bae, Duk-Soo
    Kim, Jae Weon
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) : 1973 - 1979
  • [28] Safe Criteria for Less Radical Trachelectomy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Clinicopathologic Study
    Hee Seung Kim
    Chel Hun Choi
    Myong-Chul Lim
    Suk-Joon Chang
    Yong Beom Kim
    Min A. Kim
    Tae-Jin Kim
    Sang-Yoon Park
    Byoung-Gie Kim
    Yong Sang Song
    Duk-Soo Bae
    Jae Weon Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 1973 - 1979
  • [29] Fertility-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Trachelectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Early-stage Cervical Cancer
    Chuang, Linus T.
    Lerner, Dimitry L.
    Liu, Connie S.
    Nezhat, Farr R.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (06) : 767 - 770
  • [30] Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery
    Vieira, Marcelo A.
    Rendon, Gabriel J.
    Munsell, Mark
    Echeverri, Lina
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Pareja, Rene
    Escobar, Pedro F.
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 138 (03) : 585 - 589