Reliability and Validity of the Functional Movement Screen™ with a Modified Scoring System for Young Adults with Low Back Pain

被引:6
|
作者
Alkhathami, Khalid [1 ]
Alshehre, Yousef [2 ]
Wang-Price, Sharon [3 ]
Brizzolara, Kelli [3 ]
机构
[1] Shaqra Univ, Dept Hlth Rehabil, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Tabuk, Phys Therapy Dept, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
[3] Texas Womans Univ, Sch Phys Therapy, Denton, TX 76204 USA
来源
关键词
interrater reliability; intra-rater reliability; construct validity; lumbar spine; movement impairments movement system; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; FUNDAMENTAL MOVEMENTS; RISK-FACTORS; INJURIES; EXERCISE; BALANCE; RATERS; SCORES; POWER;
D O I
10.26603/001c.23427
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common complaints in individuals who seek medical care and is a leading cause of movement impairments. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS (TM)) was developed to evaluate neuromuscular impairments during movement. However, the reliability and validity of the FMS (TM) have not yet been established for the LBP population because of a limitation of its original scoring system. Purpose The purposes of this study were to determine the reliability and validity of the FMS (TM) with a modified scoring system in young adults with and without LBP. The FMS (TM) scores were modified by assigning a zero score only when there was an increase in LBP during the FMS (TM), not simply for the presence of pain, as in the original FMS (TM) scoring system. Study Design Reliability and validity study. Methods Twenty-two participants with LBP (8 males and 14 females, 26.7 +/- 4.68 years old) and 22 age- and gender-matched participants without LBP (26.64 +/- 4.20 years old) completed the study. Each participant performed the FMS (TM) once while being scored simultaneously and independently by two investigators. In addition, each participant's FMS (TM) performance was video-recorded and then was scored by another two investigators separately. The video-recorded performance also was scored twice six weeks apart by the same investigator to determine intra-rater reliability. Results The results showed excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the FMS (TM) composite score with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 for both groups. In addition, the LBP group scored significantly lower than the group without LBP (p = 0.008). Conclusions The results indicate that the FMS (TM) is able to distinguish between individuals with and without LBP, and that it could be a useful test for clinicians to quantify movement quality and to assess movement restrictions in individuals with LBP.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 627
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intertester reliability of a low back pain classification system
    Wilson, L
    Hall, H
    McIntosh, G
    Melles, T
    SPINE, 1999, 24 (03) : 248 - 254
  • [32] Low Back Pain Among Weightlifting Adolescents and Young Adults
    Fares, Mohamad Y.
    Fares, Jawad
    Salhab, Hamza A.
    Khachfe, Hussein H.
    Bdeir, Ahmad
    Fares, Youssef
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [33] Validity and Reliability of the French Version of the STarT Back Screening Tool for Patients With Low Back Pain
    Bruyere, Olivier
    Demoulin, Maryline
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Maquet, Didier
    Genevay, Stephane
    Mahieu, Genevieve
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Crielaard, Jean-Michel
    Demoulin, Christophe
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (02) : E123 - E128
  • [34] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE ISTANBUL LOW BACK PAIN DISABILITY INDEX IN LUMBAR RADICULOPATHY
    Sencan, Savas
    Erdem, Didem
    Bilim, Serhad
    Duruoz, Mehmet Tuncay
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 78 : 536 - 536
  • [35] Reliability and validity of the Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index in lumbosacral radiculopathy
    Sencan, Savas
    Erdem, Didem
    Gunduz, Osman Hakan
    Bilim, Serhad
    Duruoz, Mehmet Tuncay
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 34 (05) : 813 - 820
  • [36] Validity and reliability of the full cup test in patients with chronic low back pain
    Agir, Hatice
    Aras, Muyesser
    Keskin, Esra Dilek
    Ozer, Hafsa Feyza
    Karaca, Gulten
    Ergun, Ufuk
    Yorubulut, Serap
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2022, 34 (03): : 166 - 173
  • [37] Reliability of novice raters in using the movement system impairment approach to classify people with low back pain
    Henry, Sharon M.
    Van Dillen, Linda R.
    Trombley, Andrea R.
    Dee, Justine M.
    Bunn, Janice Y.
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2013, 18 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [38] Dimensionality, reliability, and validity of the Finnish version of the pain catastrophizing scale in chronic low back pain
    Mikkonen, Jani
    Leinonen, Ville
    Laehdeoja, Tuomas
    Holopainen, Riikka
    Ekstroem, Kristian
    Koho, Petteri
    Airaksinen, Olavi
    Luciano, Juan V.
    Navarrete, Jaime
    Neblett, Randy
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [39] Functional Exercise for Adults with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
    Moreira, Emilia
    Jones, Anamaria
    Lima, Eider
    Jennings, Fabio
    Natour, Jamil
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 71
  • [40] A Standardized Assessment of Movement-evoked Pain Ratings Is Associated With Functional Outcomes in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
    Knox, Patrick J.
    Simon, Corey B.
    Pohlig, Ryan T.
    Pugliese, Jenifer M.
    Coyle, Peter C.
    Sions, Jaclyn M.
    Hicks, Gregory E.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2022, 38 (04): : 241 - 249