Effect of intercropping row ratios on yield and nutritive value of maize and cowpea fodder

被引:0
|
作者
Arif, Mohd. [1 ]
Kumar, Arvind [1 ]
Pourouchottamane, R. [1 ]
Gupta, D. L. [1 ]
Singh, M. K. [1 ]
Rai, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Cent Inst Res Goats, Makhdoom 281122, India
关键词
Dry matter intake; Fodder production efficiency; Fodder quality; Relative feed value; ZEA-MAYS L; FORAGE YIELD; QUALITY; NITROGEN; PRODUCTIVITY; MIXTURES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A field experiment was conducted during Kharif seasons of 2020 at Agriculture Farm of ICAR- CIRG, Makhdoom to study the effect of various intercropping row ratios on fodder yield and quality in maize and cowpea combinations system. The treatments consist of nine intercropping combinations viz., sole maize, sole cowpea, maize + cowpea (1:1), maize + cowpea (2:1), maize + cowpea (1: 2), maize + cowpea (2:2), maize+ cowpea (3:1), maize + cowpea (1:3), maize + cowpea (3:3). The experiment was laid out in randomize block design with three replications. The study indicated that highest value of growth parameters viz., plant height of maize ( 216 cm) and cowpea (212 cm), number of leaves plant-1, stem thickness in maize and branches plant(-1) in cowpea were recorded in 1:3 row ratios of maize + cowpea intercropping. However, maximum value of total green and dry fodder yield was recorded with 2: 1 row ratios of maize + cowpea intercropping (38.0 and 7.7 t ha(-1)) followed by 3:1 row ratios (37.6 and 7.6 t ha-1). Further, 1:3 row ratios of maize + cowpea intercropping recorded significantly higher value of crude protein (7.94 and 17.68%), ether extract (1.21 and 2.69 %), ash content (7.60 and 12.74%), total digestible nutrients (63.77 and 64.23%) digestible dry matter (66.22 and 66.50%), relative feed quality (110.74 and 139.10%) and net energy for lactation (1.54 and 1.55 Mcal/kg) in fodder maize and cowpea, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECT OF A WINTER CEREAL OR LEGUME CROP ON THE YIELD AND NUTRIENT-UPTAKE BY SUMMER MAIZE COWPEA FODDER
    GEORGE, M
    PRASAD, R
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU, 1989, 163 (03): : 212 - 214
  • [22] Effect of intercropping on maize grain yield and yield components
    HUANG Cheng-dong
    LIU Quan-qing
    LI Xiao-lin
    ZHANG Chao-chun
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18 (08) : 1690 - 1700
  • [23] Effect of intercropping on maize grain yield and yield components
    Huang Cheng-dong
    Liu Quan-qing
    Li Xiao-lin
    Zhang Chao-chun
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2019, 18 (08) : 1690 - 1700
  • [24] Intercropping maize and cowpea cultivars: I. Green-grain yield
    Leite da Silva, Marcos Antonio
    Lima e Silva, Paulo Sergio
    de Oliveira, Vianney Reinaldo
    de Sousa, Roberto Pequeno
    Barbosa e Silva, Paulo Igor
    REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2020, 51 (01):
  • [25] RESEARCH ON PRODUCTIVITY AND YIELD QUALITY OF MAIZE AND COWPEA INTERCROPPING IN THE ORGANIC AGRICULTURE SYSTEM
    Dusa, Elena Mirela
    Roman, Gh. V.
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2010, 53 : 371 - 377
  • [26] ANNUAL COTTON COWPEA INTERCROPPING .1. EFFECT OF ROW ARRANGEMENT
    DEAZEVEDO, DMP
    BELTRAO, NED
    VIEIRA, DJ
    DANOBREGA, LB
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1993, 28 (07) : 813 - 822
  • [27] EFFECT OF METHODS OF INTERCROPPING MAIZE WITH COWPEA ON PRODUCTION OF ANIMAL FEED
    SHARMA, SC
    SINGH, HG
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1972, 42 (10): : 904 - 908
  • [28] The effect of variety on maize grain and crop residue yield and nutritive value of the stover
    Tolera, A
    Berg, T
    Sundstol, F
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 79 (03) : 165 - 177
  • [29] The yield and nutritive value of maize hybrids grown for silage
    Millner, JP
    Villaver, R
    Hardacre, AK
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2005, 48 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [30] Effect of phosphorus and zinc nutrition on growth and yield of fodder cowpea
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Rathore, Deepak Kumar
    Singh, Magan
    Kumar, Parveen
    Khippal, Anil
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2016, 39 (02) : 262 - 267