共 50 条
Prognostic significance of high-risk human papillomavirus and p16INK4A in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
被引:1
|作者:
Cao, Fangli
[1
,2
]
Zhang, Weihong
[2
]
Zhang, Fang
[4
]
Han, Hui
[2
]
Xu, Junlong
[3
]
Cheng, Yufeng
[1
]
机构:
[1] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[2] Liaocheng Peoples Hosp, Dept Oncol, Liaocheng, Peoples R China
[3] Liaocheng Peoples Hosp, Dept Pathol, Liaocheng, Peoples R China
[4] First Hosp Zibo, Dept Oncol, Zibo, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
Human papillomavirus;
p16(INK4A);
squamous cell carcinoma;
esophageal cancer;
prognosis;
CANCER;
SURVIVAL;
HEAD;
NECK;
EXPRESSION;
P16;
RADIOTHERAPY;
TRENDS;
RATES;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
R-3 [医学研究方法];
R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
The prognostic value of the HPV status in ESCC is much controversial, this study aimed to determine the prognostic importance of high-risk HPV and p16 in patients with ESCC. A total of 105 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy in 2008 were included in this study. All specimens with ESCC were tested by in situ hybridization for HPV16/18 and immunohistochemistry for p16 expression. Kappa values were calculated using Cohen's kappa test. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated in relation to the two markers and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the hazard ratio (HR) of variables. Thirtynine (37.1%) of 105 were p16-positive, and HPV was detected in 29 of the 105 patients (27.6%) with ESCC. P16 was detected in 25 of the 29 patients (86.2%) who were HPV-positive, and only 14 of 76 patients (18.4%) who were HPV-negative (P < 0.001). Cohen's kappa coefficient revealed an agreement in two researchers (kappa = 0.61). The 5-year OS rate and PFS rate in the p16-positive group were 64.1% and 58.7%, respectively, and the rates in the p16negative group were 45.5%, 37.9%, respectively. The difference of survival rate between the two groups remained statistically significant. P16-positive patients had better 5-year rates of OS and PFS than p16-negative group (P = 0.02 and P = 0.007 by the Log-rank test, respectively). Using HPV status as a stratification factor, we found differences in OS and PFS that were consistent with those based on p16 expression. P16 is a very good marker of HPV infection for ESCC. HPV-positive or p16-positive ESCC is a distinct entity with a favorable prognosis compared with HPV-negative or p16-negative ESCC.
引用
收藏
页码:3430 / 3438
页数:9
相关论文