Expert Elicitation Methodology in the Risk Analysis of an Industrial Machine

被引:0
|
作者
Venditti, Tony [1 ]
Nguyen Duy Phuong Tran [2 ]
Anh Dung Ngo [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Technol Super, Dept Mech Engn, 1100 Notre Dame West, Montreal, PQ H3 1K3, Canada
[2] HCM City Univ Technol, Fac Mech Engn, 268 Ly Thuong Kiet St,Ward 10, Hcmc, Vietnam
关键词
Expert elicitation; Industrial machines; Brake press safety; FAULT-TREE ANALYSIS; FUZZY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_16
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Calculation of the probability of occurrence of an accident involving an industrial machine such as a metal bending press requires knowledge of the failure rates. Specifically, what is needed are the failure rate of the protective device and, the failure rate associated with the human action consisting in having one's hands between the press dies while the operator is bending a part. The first data could, in principle be obtained from the manufacturer of the device. However, in reality, this data involves knowledge of the reliability of not only the protective device but also of the associated command circuitry. In reality, such data may be difficult to obtain. Also, many important statistics relating to human performance are not collected by workplaces. So, another way to obtain the data is through expert elicitation, that is consulting people knowledgeable with the problem at hand and asking them to estimate, based on their judgement, the probabilities or failure rates that are sought. This process is often used in the literature but is seldom described in detail. In this paper, expert elicitation is used and described in order to gather relevant data for the purpose of probability estimation. Thus, eight bending press operators in a large manufacturing plant, the health and safety coordinator as well as the workers' supervisor were solicited. A questionnaire was handed to them consisting of a set of brief instructions followed by three questions which were provided with multiple possible qualitative probability estimates to choose from. In order to improve the quality of the probability estimates, the suggested probabilities were associated with typical accidental events which serve as a comparison basis for the participants. A general introduction was given by the author to the participants in a group meeting on the shop floor which consisted of presentation the research project, its purpose. The questions and the choice of answers were read and explained to the group. The questionnaire was then handed to them. The whole process took little time to complete. These estimates represent the experts' estimates of the probability of occurrence of the events in question, expressed in linguistic, qualitative terms. These estimates were translated in quantitative terms through fuzzy logic technique. More specifically, a scale composed of qualitative statements and their corresponding triangular fuzzy number was established with two main simple guiding principles in mind. Firstly, the scale should reflect the probability scales found in often-used safety standards. Secondly, the fuzzy triangular numbers should not overlap so that there is no need to invert any of their components as required by the rules of fuzzy number arithmetic.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 167
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TECTONIC RISK FORECASTING THROUGH EXPERT ELICITATION FOR GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORIES: THE TOPAZ PROJECT
    Goto, Junichi
    Kawamura, Hideki
    Chapman, Neil
    [J]. ASME 2013 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT, VOL 1: LOW/INTERMEDIATE-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT; SPENT FUEL, FISSILE MATERIAL, TRANSURANIC AND HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013,
  • [42] A risk-based methodology for privacy requirements elicitation and control selection
    Manna, Asmita
    Sengupta, Anirban
    Mazumdar, Chandan
    [J]. SECURITY AND PRIVACY, 2022, 5 (01):
  • [43] A qualitative risk assessment methodology for scientific expert panels
    Dufour, B.
    Plee, L.
    Moutou, F.
    Boisseleau, D.
    Chartier, C.
    Durand, B.
    Ganiere, J. P.
    Guillotin, J.
    Lancelot, R.
    Saegerman, C.
    Thebault, A.
    Hattenberger, A. M.
    Toma, B.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2011, 30 (03): : 673 - 681
  • [44] Expert informants and relative risk: A methodology for modeling waterways
    Gramling, R
    Forsyth, CJ
    Wooddell, G
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 1998, 18 (05) : 557 - 562
  • [45] Classification of Listeria monocytogenes Persistence in Retail Delicatessen Environments Using Expert Elicitation and Machine Learning
    Vangay, P.
    Steingrimsson, J.
    Wiedmann, M.
    Stasiewicz, M. J.
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (10) : 1830 - 1845
  • [46] Expert elicitation for reliable system design
    Bedford, Tim
    Quigley, John
    Walls, Lesley
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 21 (04) : 428 - 450
  • [47] The 'heuristics and biases' bias in expert elicitation
    Kynn, Mary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2008, 171 : 239 - 264
  • [48] Dealing with the expert inconsistency in probability elicitation
    Monti, S
    Carenini, G
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2000, 12 (04) : 499 - 508
  • [49] Psoriasis Prevalence and Severity by Expert Elicitation
    Kim A. Papp
    Robert Gniadecki
    Jennifer Beecker
    Jan Dutz
    Melinda J. Gooderham
    Chih-Ho Hong
    Mark G. Kirchhof
    Chuck W. Lynde
    Catherine Maari
    Yves Poulin
    Ron B. Vender
    [J]. Dermatology and Therapy, 2021, 11 : 1053 - 1064
  • [50] Expert Knowledge Elicitation: Subjective but Scientific
    O'Hagan, Anthony
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2019, 73 : 69 - 81