Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to assess radiation therapy response for head and neck paragangliomas

被引:14
|
作者
Ota, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Liao, Eric [1 ]
Kurokawa, Ryo [1 ]
Syed, Faiz [1 ]
Baba, Akira [1 ]
Kurokawa, Mariko [1 ]
Moritani, Toshio [1 ]
Srinivasan, Ashok [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Div Neuroradiol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,UHB2, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
DCE‐ MRI; DWI; head and neck; paraganglioma; radiation therapy; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; COEFFICIENT VALUES; BENIGN; DIFFERENTIATION; RADIOTHERAPY; PERMEABILITY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1111/jon.12875
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose The prediction of radiotherapy outcome in head and neck paragangliomas is clinically important. We investigated perfusion and diffusion markers for evaluation of response to radiotherapy of head and neck paragangliomas. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 330 consecutive patients from January 2016 to September 2019 with suspected head and neck paragangliomas, and enrolled 11 patients (2 males, 9 females; age: 55.2 +/- 10.3 years) who had conventional MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI before and after radiation therapy. Radiation therapy, consisting of external beam radiotherapy or stereotactic radiotherapy, was conducted at the radiation oncology department in a single center. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), normalized mean ADC, and parameters of DCE-MRI were compared between pre- and post-treatment status by paired t-test. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used for the relationship between tumor volume ratio (post-treatment status/pre-treatment status) and pre-treatment and post-treatment values. Results Mean and normalized ADC values were statistically higher in post-treatment status than pre-treatment status (p = 0.005, p = 0.005, respectively), and Ktrans (volume transfer constant between extravascular, extracellular space [EES], and blood plasma per minute) and Kep (rate transfer constant between EES and blood plasma per minute) were significantly lower in post-treatment status than pre-treatment status (p = 0.007, p = 0.027, respectively). The correlation coefficient of the relationship between tumor volume ratio and pre-treatment Ktrans (r = 0.70; p = 0.016) and between tumor volume ratio and post-treatment Ktrans and Kep (r = 0.83; p = 0.002, r = 0.8; p = 0.003, respectively) was statistically significant. Conclusions Ktrans has predictive potential to predict the response to radiation therapy of head and neck paragangliomas.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1035 / 1043
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis therapy by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Nataša Gašperšič
    Igor Serša
    Vladimir Jevtič
    Matija Tomšič
    Sonja Praprotnik
    Skeletal Radiology, 2008, 37 : 123 - 131
  • [32] Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis therapy by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Gaspersic, Natasa
    Sersa, Igor
    Jevtic, Vladimir
    Tomsic, Matija
    Praprotnik, Sonja
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (02) : 123 - 131
  • [33] Murine tumors microenvironment after irradiation characterized by diffusion-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and immunohistology
    Drzal, A.
    Gonet, M.
    Skorka, T.
    Elas, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S53 - S54
  • [34] Correlation of quantitative diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters with prognostic factors in prostate cancer
    Chung, Melody P.
    Margolis, Dan
    Mesko, Shane
    Wang, Jason
    Kupelian, Patrick
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 58 (05) : 588 - 594
  • [35] Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis - Correlation with biopsy and histopathology
    Kozlowski, Piotr
    Chang, Silvia D.
    Jones, Edward C.
    Berean, Kenneth W.
    Chen, Henry
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 24 (01) : 108 - 113
  • [36] Prostate cancer detection with MRI: is dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging necessary in addition to diffusion-weighted imaging?
    Iwazawa, Jin
    Mitani, Takashi
    Sassa, Seitaro
    Ohue, Shoichi
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (03) : 243 - 248
  • [37] An Assessment of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Diagnosis of Cholesteatoma Recurrence
    Kavanagh, R. G.
    Carroll, A. G.
    Hone, S. W.
    Malone, D. E.
    Killeen, R. P.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 : S524 - S525
  • [38] Prostate Cancer: assessing the effects of androgen-deprivation therapy using quantitative diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Andreas M. Hötker
    Yousef Mazaheri
    Junting Zheng
    Chaya S. Moskowitz
    Joshua Berkowitz
    Joshua E. Lantos
    Xin Pei
    Michael J. Zelefsky
    Hedvig Hricak
    Oguz Akin
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 2665 - 2672
  • [39] Prostate Cancer: assessing the effects of androgen-deprivation therapy using quantitative diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Hoetker, Andreas M.
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Zheng, Junting
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Berkowitz, Joshua
    Lantos, Joshua E.
    Pei, Xin
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Akin, Oguz
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (09) : 2665 - 2672
  • [40] Chemoembolization of hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma: Assessment of response with contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI
    Buijs, Manon
    Vossen, Josephina A.
    Hong, Kelvin
    Georgiades, Christos S.
    Geschwind, Jean-Francois H.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (01) : 285 - 289