Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Safety and Outcomes

被引:30
|
作者
Shen, Chaoyong [1 ]
Chen, Haining [1 ]
Yin, Yuan [1 ]
Chen, Jiaju [1 ]
Han, Luyin [2 ]
Zhang, Bo [1 ]
Chen, Zhixin [1 ]
Chen, Jiaping [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
MUSCULARIS PROPRIA LAYER; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; RISK STRATIFICATION; ENUCLEATION; RECURRENCE; PATHOLOGY; LIGATION; GIST;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000000376
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Endoscopic resection has been performed to treat small gastric neoplasms. However, this technique for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) remains controversial. This study aims to compare the safety and surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection of small gastric GISTs. The medical records of 54 consecutive gastric GISTs patients with tumor size of <= 2 cm, who were surgically treated with endoscopic resection (endoscopic group) or open surgery (laparotomy group) in a single institution from March 2010 to June 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical and tumor characteristics, surgical safety, and tumor-related outcomes were evaluated. Of 54 patients, 32 and 22 patients underwent endoscopic resection and laparotomy, respectively. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection yielded a significantly shorter hospital stay compared with patients who underwent laparotomy (P < 0.001). Compared with patients in the endoscopic group, patients in the laparotomy group had more intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), had longer nasogastric tube retention (P < 0.001), and required longer operative time (P < 0.001). More laparotomy patients required postoperative analgesic drugs than those in the endoscopic group (n = 9 vs 4; P = 0.016). Gastric perforation occurred in 1 case during operation in the endoscopic group. Patients who underwent these 2 procedures did not differ with respect to tumor size (P = 0.168), perioperative transfusion (P = 1.000), reoperation (P = 1.000), early satiety (P = 0.560), and postoperative bleeding (P = 1.000). With a median follow-up time of 34.5 months, 1 high-risk patient in each group experienced tumor recurrence/metastasis postoperatively. The endoscopic procedure allows safe resection with good surgical outcomes for small gastric GISTs compared with laparotomy. Moreover, larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm endoscopic application for small gastric GISTs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic gastric resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Jennifer A. Sexton
    Richard A. Pierce
    Valerie J. Halpin
    J. Christopher Eagon
    William G. Hawkins
    David C. Linehan
    L. Michael Brunt
    Margaret M. Frisella
    Brent D. Matthews
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 2583 - 2587
  • [42] Comparison of treatment outcomes between laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeries for relatively small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Chen, Liang
    Zhang, Qiang
    Li, Feng-Yuan
    Yang, Li
    Zhang, Dian-Cai
    Wang, Lin-Jun
    Wang, Wei-Zhi
    Li, Zheng
    Xu, Jiang-Hao
    He, Zhong-Yuan
    Xu, Kang-Jing
    Chen, Ming
    Xu, Hao
    Xu, Ze-Kuan
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2018, 27 (04): : 737 - 742
  • [43] Laparoscopic resection is not superior to endoscopic resection for relative small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score-matched study
    Li, De-Liang
    Zhou, Yang-Yang
    Zhang, Ji-Yu
    Liu, Dan
    Zhao, Li-Xia
    Liu, Bing-Rong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [44] How can endoscopic R0 resection be ensured for relatively small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors?
    Zhang, Qiang
    Liu, Si-De
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 (08) : 773 - 773
  • [45] The Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Endoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    Mi, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Qi
    Liu, Jie
    Zhang, Li-Xian
    Du, Hong-Wei
    Zhao, Dong-Qiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 5149 - 5157
  • [46] Safety and efficiency of endoscopic resection versus laparoscopic resection in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Chao
    Gao, Zhidong
    Shen, Kai
    Cao, Jian
    Shen, Zhanlong
    Jiang, Kewei
    Wang, Shan
    Ye, Yingjiang
    [J]. EJSO, 2020, 46 (04): : 667 - 674
  • [47] Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Qi-Long
    Pan, Yu
    Cai, Jia-Qin
    Wu, Di
    Chen, Ke
    Mou, Yi-Ping
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 12
  • [48] Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qi-Long Chen
    Yu Pan
    Jia-Qin Cai
    Di Wu
    Ke Chen
    Yi-Ping Mou
    [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 12
  • [49] Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for small (≤ 4.0 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer
    Zhang, Yu
    Mao, Xin-Li
    Zhou, Xian-Bin
    Yang, Hai
    Zhu, Lin-Hong
    Chen, Guang
    Ye, Li-Ping
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 24 (27) : 3030 - 3037
  • [50] Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for the treatment of intermediate- or high-risk gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter retrospective study
    Xu, Enpan
    Shi, Qiang
    Qi, Zhipeng
    Li, Bing
    Sun, Huihui
    Ren, Zhong
    Cai, Shilun
    He, Dongli
    Lv, Zhengtao
    Chen, Zhanghan
    Zhong, Liang
    Xu, Leiming
    Li, Xiaobo
    Xu, Shuchang
    Zhou, Pinghong
    Zhong, Yunshi
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (06): : 3353 - 3360