Phytochrome Mediated Responses in Agrobacterium fabrum: Growth, Motility and Plant Infection

被引:7
|
作者
Xue, Peng [1 ,4 ]
Bai, Yingnan [1 ,8 ]
Rottwinkel, Gregor [1 ]
Averbukh, Elizaveta [1 ]
Ma, Yuanyuan [2 ]
Roeder, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Scheerer, Patrick [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Krauss, Norbert [1 ]
Lamparter, Tilman [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Bot Inst, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Zool Inst, Mol Physiol, Olshausenstr 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
[3] German Ctr Lung Res, Airway Res Ctr North, DZL, Kiel, Germany
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Michael Smith Labs, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Med Phys & Biophys, Grp Prot Xray Crystallog & Signal Transduct, Berlin, Germany
[6] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[7] Charite, Berlin, Germany
[8] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
关键词
TUMEFACIENS; BACTERIOPHYTOCHROMES; TRANSFORMATION; SYSTEMS; DNA;
D O I
10.1007/s00284-021-02526-5
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The soil bacterium and plant pathogen Agrobacterium fabrum C58 has two phytochrome photoreceptors, Agp1 and Agp2. We found that plant infection and tumor induction by A. fabrum is down-regulated by light and that phytochrome knockout mutants of A. fabrum have diminished infection rates. The regulation pattern of infection matches with that of bacterial conjugation reported earlier, suggesting similar regulatory mechanisms. In the regulation of conjugation and plant infection, phytochromes are active in darkness. This is a major difference to plant phytochromes, which are typically active after irradiation. We also found that propagation and motility were affected in agp1(-) and agp2(-) knockout mutants, although propagation was not always affected by light. The regulatory patterns can partially but not completely be explained by modulated histidine kinase activities of Agp1 and Agp2. In a mass spectrometry-based proteomic study, 24 proteins were different between light and dark grown A. fabrum, whereas 382 proteins differed between wild type and phytochrome knockout mutants, pointing again to light independent roles of Agp1 and Agp2.
引用
收藏
页码:2708 / 2719
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GATEWAY™ vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation
    Karimi, M
    Inzé, D
    Depicker, A
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2002, 7 (05) : 193 - 195
  • [32] ACTINOMYCIN-D INHIBITION OF PHYTOCHROME-MEDIATED RESPONSES
    CARR, DJ
    REID, DM
    PLANTA, 1966, 69 (01) : 70 - +
  • [33] Coordination of Cryptochrome and Phytochrome Signals in the Regulation of Plant Light Responses
    Su, Jun
    Liu, Bobin
    Liao, Jiakai
    Yang, Zhaohe
    Lin, Chentao
    Oka, Yoshito
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2017, 7 (01):
  • [34] Opposing roles of phytochrome A and phytochrome B in early cryptochrome-mediated growth inhibition
    Folta, KM
    Spalding, EP
    PLANT JOURNAL, 2001, 28 (03): : 333 - 340
  • [35] EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON PHYTOCHROME-MEDIATED RESPONSES IN SEEDLINGS OF MUSTARD
    KINNERSLEY, AM
    DAVIES, PJ
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 60 (01) : 175 - 177
  • [36] Diverse light responses of cyanobacteria mediated by phytochrome superfamily photoreceptors
    Wiltbank, Lisa B.
    Kehoe, David M.
    NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 17 (01) : 37 - 50
  • [37] Phytochrome, Carbon Sensing, Metabolism, and Plant Growth Plasticity
    Krahmer, Johanna
    Ganpudi, Ashwin
    Abbas, Ammad
    Romanowski, Andres
    Halliday, Karen J.
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 176 (02) : 1039 - 1048
  • [38] Phytochrome and Phytohormones: Working in Tandem for Plant Growth and Development
    Lymperopoulos, Panagiotis
    Msanne, Joseph
    Rabara, Roel
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 9
  • [39] PURIFICATION AND PROPERTIES OF PHYTOCHROME - A CHROMOPROTEIN REGULATING PLANT GROWTH
    SIEGELMA.HW
    HENDRICK.SB
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1965, 24 (4P1) : 863 - &
  • [40] Identifying plant genes involved in Agrobacterium infection of grapevine
    Deak, T.
    Kupi, T.
    Szegedi, E.
    Bisztray, Gy. D.
    Olah, R.
    IX INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GRAPEVINE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 1157 : 315 - 319