A prospective doubleblind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder

被引:28
|
作者
Cho, C-H [1 ]
Min, B-W [1 ]
Bae, K-C [1 ]
Lee, K-J [1 ]
Kim, D. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; STEROID INJECTION; ACCURACY; EFFICACY; SITES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0755.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Ultrasound (US)-guided injections are widely used in patients with conditions of the shoulder in order to improve their accuracy. However, the clinical efficacy of US-guided injections compared with blind injections remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of US-guided compared with blind corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint in patients with primary frozen shoulder (FS). Methods Intra-articular corticosteroid injections were administered to 90 patients primary FS, who were randomly assigned to either an US-guided (n = 45) or a blind technique (n = 45), by a shoulder specialist. Immediately after injection, fluoroscopic images were obtained to assess the accuracy of the injection. The outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and range of movement (ROM) for all patients at the time of presentation and at three, six, and 12 weeks after injection. Results The accuracy of injection in the US and blind groups was 100% (45/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively; this difference was significant (p < 0.001). Both groups had significant improvements in VAS pain score, ASES score, SSV, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation throughout follow-up until 12 weeks after injection (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the VAS pain scores, the ASES score, the SSV and all ROMs between the two groups at the time points assessed (all p > 0.05). No injection-related adverse effects were noted in either group. Conclusion We found no significant differences in pain and functional outcomes between the two groups, although an US-guided injection was associated with greater accuracy. Considering that it is both costly and time-consuming, an US-guided intra-articular injection of corticosteroid seems not always to be necessary in the treatment of FS as it gives similar outcomes as a blind injection.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections in the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised controlled study
    Luz, K. R.
    Furtado, R. N. V.
    Nunes, C. C. G.
    Rosenfeld, A.
    Fernandes, A. R. C.
    Natour, J.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2008, 67 (08) : 1198 - 1200
  • [42] Palpation Versus Ultrasound-Guided Acromioclavicular Joint Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections: A Retrospective Comparative Clinical Study (vol 18, pg 333, 2015)
    Park, K. D.
    Kim, T. K.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (05) : 517 - 517
  • [43] Ultrasound-guided prolotherapy versus corticosteroid injections for the treatment of patients with plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial
    Teymouri, Alireza
    Alaei, Fatemeh
    Fakheri, Maryamsadat
    Nasiri, Aref
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [44] Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections
    Griesser, Michael J.
    Harris, Joshua D.
    Campbell, Jonathan E.
    Jones, Grant L.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (18): : 1727 - 1733
  • [45] Impact of an educational intervention utilising a three-dimensional-printed model for ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections of the dislocated shoulder
    Cosgrave, Conor
    Anakin, Megan
    Blyth, Phil
    Baillie, Louisa
    Beck, Sierra
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2024, 36 (06) : 891 - 897
  • [46] Economic Impact of Ketorolac vs Corticosteroid Intra-Articular Knee Injections for Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study
    Bellamy, Jaime L.
    Goff, Brandon J.
    Sayeed, Siraj A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (09): : S293 - S297
  • [47] Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Intra-articular Injections of Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Hip Osteoarthritis
    Battaglia, Milva
    Guaraldi, Federica
    Vannini, Francesca
    Rossi, Giuseppe
    Timoncini, Antonio
    Buda, Roberto
    Giannini, Sandro
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 36 (12) : E1501 - E1508
  • [48] Response to Letter tothe Editor on "Rotator Interval versus Posterior Approach Ultrasound-guided Corticosteroid Injections in Primary Frozen Shoulder: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Arrambide-Garza, Francisco Javier
    Guerrero-Zertuche, Juventino Tadeo
    Alvarez-Villalobos, Neri Alejandro
    Quiroga-Garza, Alejandro
    Espinosa-Uribe, Abraham
    Vilchez-Cavazos, Felix
    Rivera-Perez, Juanantonio
    Elizondo-Omana, Rodrigo Enrique
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 105 (05): : 1022 - 1022
  • [49] Transforaminal versus Intra-Articular Facet Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study
    Bureau, N. J.
    Moser, T.
    Dagher, J. H.
    Shedid, D.
    Li, M.
    Brassard, P.
    Leduc, B. E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (08) : 1467 - 1474
  • [50] Is Ultrasound-guided or Landmark-guided Intra-articular Lidocaine Injection More Effective for Pain Control in Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Reduction? A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rungsinaporn, Visit
    Innarkgool, Sirasit
    Kongmalai, Pinkawas
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 482 (07) : 1201 - 1207