A prospective doubleblind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder

被引:28
|
作者
Cho, C-H [1 ]
Min, B-W [1 ]
Bae, K-C [1 ]
Lee, K-J [1 ]
Kim, D. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; STEROID INJECTION; ACCURACY; EFFICACY; SITES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0755.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Ultrasound (US)-guided injections are widely used in patients with conditions of the shoulder in order to improve their accuracy. However, the clinical efficacy of US-guided injections compared with blind injections remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of US-guided compared with blind corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint in patients with primary frozen shoulder (FS). Methods Intra-articular corticosteroid injections were administered to 90 patients primary FS, who were randomly assigned to either an US-guided (n = 45) or a blind technique (n = 45), by a shoulder specialist. Immediately after injection, fluoroscopic images were obtained to assess the accuracy of the injection. The outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and range of movement (ROM) for all patients at the time of presentation and at three, six, and 12 weeks after injection. Results The accuracy of injection in the US and blind groups was 100% (45/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively; this difference was significant (p < 0.001). Both groups had significant improvements in VAS pain score, ASES score, SSV, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation throughout follow-up until 12 weeks after injection (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the VAS pain scores, the ASES score, the SSV and all ROMs between the two groups at the time points assessed (all p > 0.05). No injection-related adverse effects were noted in either group. Conclusion We found no significant differences in pain and functional outcomes between the two groups, although an US-guided injection was associated with greater accuracy. Considering that it is both costly and time-consuming, an US-guided intra-articular injection of corticosteroid seems not always to be necessary in the treatment of FS as it gives similar outcomes as a blind injection.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Letter to the editor regarding "A prospective double-blind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder"
    Zeng, Zeng
    Chen, Cong-Xian
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 38 (10)
  • [2] Letter to the editor regarding "A prospective double-blind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder"
    Zeng Zeng
    Cong-Xian Chen
    Medical Oncology, 2021, 38
  • [3] Ultrasound-guided intra-articular and rotator interval corticosteroid injections in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a double-blind, sham-controlled randomized study
    Prestgaard, Tore
    Wormgoor, Marjon E. A.
    Haugen, Simen
    Harstad, Herlof
    Mowinckel, Petter
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    PAIN, 2015, 156 (09) : 1683 - 1691
  • [4] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Idiopathic Frozen Shoulder and Diabetic Frozen Shoulder After a Single Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection
    Cho, Chul-Hyun
    Jin, Hyo-Joon
    Kim, Du Hwan
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (06)
  • [5] Palpation Versus Ultrasound-Guided Acromioclavicular Joint Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections: A Retrospective Comparative Clinical Study
    Park, Ki Deok
    Kim, Tai Kon
    Lee, Jihae
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Ahn, Jae Ki
    Park, Yongbum
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (04) : 333 - 341
  • [6] RETRACTED: Ultrasound-guided versus blind corticosteroid injections for De Quervain tendinopathy: a prospective randomized trial (Retracted Article)
    Roh, Young Hak
    Hong, Seok Woo
    Gong, Hyun Sik
    Baek, Goo Hyun
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (08) : 820 - 824
  • [7] In Frozen Shoulder, US-Guided Versus Blind Administration of Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections Increased Accuracy of Injections but Did Not Improve Clinical Outcomes at 12 Weeks
    Balazs, C. D. R. George C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (22): : 2144 - 2144
  • [8] A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound versus clinical guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection in inflammatory arthritis
    Cunnington, Joanna
    Marshall, Nicola
    Hide, Geoff
    Platt, Philip
    Kane, David
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2008, 58 (09): : S639 - S639
  • [9] Guided Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections in the Midfoot
    Protheroe, Derek
    Gadgil, Anirudh
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 39 (08) : 1001 - 1004
  • [10] Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections Versus Pulsed Radiofrequency in Painful Shoulder A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Study
    Eyigor, Can
    Eyigor, Sibel
    Korkmaz, Onur K.
    Uyar, Meltem
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2010, 26 (05): : 386 - 392