A joint distribution framework to improve presence-only species distribution models by exploiting opportunistic surveys

被引:2
|
作者
Molgora, Juan M. Escamilla [1 ,2 ]
Sedda, Luigi [3 ]
Diggle, Peter [2 ]
Atkinson, Peter M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Med Sch, Fac Hlth & Med, Ctr Hlth Informat Comp & Stat CHICAS, Lancaster, England
[3] Univ Lancaster, Fac Hlth & Med, Lancaster Med Sch, Lancaster, England
[4] Univ Lancaster, Fac Sci & Technol, Lancaster, England
关键词
aggregated areal data; conditional autoregressive models; maximum entropy benchmark; presence-only data; sampling bias; sampling effort; species distribution models; POINT PROCESS MODELS; BIAS; BIODIVERSITY; PREDICTION; NICHES; SPACE; STATE; AREA;
D O I
10.1111/jbi.14365
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim The availability of data related to species occurrences has favoured the development of species distribution models using only observations of presence. These data are intrinsically biased by the sampling effort. Presence-only (PO) species distribution models (SDM) typically account for this effect by introducing additional data considered to be related with the sampling. This approach, however, does not allow the characterisation of the sampling effort and hinders the interpretation of the model. Here, we propose a Bayesian framework for PO SDMs that can explicitly model the sampling effect. Location Mexico. Taxon Pines, flycatchers (family Tyranidae), birds and plants. Methods The framework defines a bivariate process separable into ecological and sampling effort processes. PO data are conceived of incomplete observations where some presences have been filtered out. A choosing principle is used to separate out presences, missing data and absences relative to the species of interest and the sampling observations. The framework provides three modelling alternatives to account for a spatial autocorrelation structure: independent latent variables (model I); common latent spatial random effect (model II) and correlated latent spatial random effects (model III). The framework was compared against the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) algorithm in two case studies: one for the prediction of pines and another for the prediction of flycatchers. Results In both case studies, at least one of the proposed models achieved higher predictive accuracy than MaxEnt. The model III fit best when the sampling effort was informative, while model II was more suitable in cases with a high proportion of non-sampled sites. Main Conclusions Our approach provides a flexible framework for PO SDMs aided by a sampling effort process informed by the accumulated observations of independent and heterogeneous surveys. For the two case studies, the framework provided a model with a higher predictive accuracy than an optimised version of MaxEnt.
引用
收藏
页码:1176 / 1192
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integration of presence-only data from several sources: a case study on dolphins' spatial distribution
    Martino, Sara
    Pace, Daniela Silvia
    Moro, Stefano
    Casoli, Edoardo
    Ventura, Daniele
    Frachea, Alessandro
    Silvestri, Margherita
    Arcangeli, Antonella
    Giacomini, Giancarlo
    Ardizzone, Giandomenico
    Lasinio, Giovanna Jona
    ECOGRAPHY, 2021, 44 (10) : 1533 - 1543
  • [42] LIVES: a new habitat modelling technique for predicting the distribution of species' occurrences using presence-only data based on limiting factor theory
    Li, Jin
    Hilbert, David W.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (13) : 3079 - 3095
  • [43] Multiscale, presence-only habitat suitability models: fine-resolution maps for eight bat species
    Bellamy, Chloe
    Scott, Christopher
    Altringham, John
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2013, 50 (04) : 892 - 901
  • [44] Community confounding in joint species distribution models
    Van Ee, Justin J.
    Ivan, Jacob S.
    Hooten, Mevin B.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [45] Community confounding in joint species distribution models
    Justin J. Van Ee
    Jacob S. Ivan
    Mevin B. Hooten
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [46] Spatial confounding in joint species distribution models
    Hui, Francis K. C.
    Vu, Quan
    Hooten, Mevin B.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024,
  • [47] LIVES: a new habitat modelling technique for predicting the distribution of species’ occurrences using presence-only data based on limiting factor theory
    Jin Li
    David W. Hilbert
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008, 17 : 3079 - 3095
  • [48] A theoretical framework for upscaling species distribution models
    Meynard, Christine N.
    Piou, Cyril
    Kaplan, David M.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 14 (11): : 2888 - 2899
  • [49] Joint species distribution models with species correlations and imperfect detection
    Tobler, Mathias W.
    Kery, Marc
    Hui, Francis K. C.
    Guillera-Arroita, Gurutzeta
    Knaus, Peter
    Sattler, Thomas
    ECOLOGY, 2019, 100 (08)
  • [50] Performance of inhomogeneous Poisson point process models under different scenarios of uncertainty in species presence-only data
    Mugumaarhahama Y.
    Fandohan A.B.
    Glèlè Kakaï R.L.
    Environmental Systems Research, 2023, 12 (01)