Preventive vaccination contributes to control classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa sp.)

被引:46
|
作者
Rossi, S. [1 ]
Pol, F. [2 ]
Forot, B. [1 ]
Masse-provin, N. [3 ]
Rigaux, S. [4 ]
Bronner, A. [5 ]
Le Potier, M. -F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Game & Wildlife Agcy, Off Natl Chasse & Faune Sauvage, Unite Sanit Faune, Wildlife Sanit Unit, F-05000 Gap, France
[2] Natl Reference Lab Swine Fever Zoopole Les Croix, Unite Virol Immunol Porcines, LERAPP, AFSSA, F-22440 Ploufragan, France
[3] Direct Serv Vet Reg Task Force CSF, F-67200 Strasbourg, France
[4] Direct Serv Vet, F-57078 Metz, France
[5] Minist Agr, Direct Gen Alimentat, F-75000 Paris, France
关键词
Wild boar; Classical swine fever; Preventive vaccination; C-STRAIN VACCINE; RT-PCR ASSAY; ORAL IMMUNIZATION; POPULATIONS; PERSISTENCE; DIAGNOSIS; GERMANY; VIRUS; TRANSMISSION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.050
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Over the last 20 years, oral vaccination implementing a live attenuated vaccine has been experimented in Europe in order to control classical swine fever (CSF) in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa sp.). This has generally led to an enhanced seroprevalence and a decreased viroprevalence at the scale of the whole vaccinated populations, but no quantitative analysis has demonstrated the protective effect of preventive vaccination or intensive baiting. In the present paper we conducted a retrospective analysis at the scale of the municipality, taking into account the local dynamics and possible covariates of infection to test the effect of preventive vaccination and of the baiting effort. To be efficient, vaccination was expected to increase seroprevalence above the level considered as suitable for preventing disease invasion (40-60%) independently of infection, to protect free areas from disease invasion or contribute to control subsequent disease intensity and duration. We also hypothesized that a better baiting effort would be correlated with an improvement of immunisation and disease control. In uninfected municipalities, seroprevalence increased up to 40% after 1 year, i.e., three vaccination campaigns. We observed a significant protective effect of preventive vaccination, especially within municipalities that had been vaccinated at least 1 year before disease emergence and where virus detection did not last more than one quarter. On the other hand, we did not detect a significant effect of the baiting effort on local seroprevalence or disease dynamics, suggesting that the baiting system could be improved. We discuss these results regarding the improvement of management measures and further research perspective. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:99 / 107
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of the World Cafe method to discuss the efficiency of African swine fever control strategies in European wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations
    Jori, F.
    Chenais, E.
    Boinas, F.
    Busauskas, P.
    Dholllander, S.
    Fleischmann, L.
    Olsevskis, E.
    Rijks, J. M.
    Schulz, K.
    Thulke, H. H.
    Viltrop, A.
    Stahl, K.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2020, 185
  • [22] Efficient oral vaccination program against classical swine fever in wild boar population
    Ikeda, Takashi
    Higashide, Daishi
    Suzuki, Takaaki
    Asano, Makoto
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [23] Changes in the Genetic Structure of Lithuania's Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) Population Following the Outbreak of African Swine Fever
    Griciuviene, Loreta
    Janeliunas, Zygimantas
    Pileviciene, Simona
    Jurgelevicius, Vaclovas
    Paulauskas, Algimantas
    GENES, 2022, 13 (09)
  • [24] Wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses as an attraction for scavengers and a potential source for soil contamination with the African swine fever virus
    Tummeleht, Lea
    Hakka, Susanna Suvi Sivia
    Jurison, Margret
    Vilem, Annika
    Nurmoja, Imbi
    Viltrop, Arvo
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [25] Field Evaluation of Coumatetralyl for the Control of Wild Boar, Sus scrofa cristatus
    Khan, Abdul Aziz
    Munir, Shahid
    Ahmed, Irfan
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2017, 49 (03) : 1143 - 1146
  • [26] Analysis of effective spatial range of oral vaccination against classical swine fever for wild boar
    Hayama, Yoko
    Sawai, Kotaro
    Murato, Yoshinori
    Yamaguchi, Emi
    Kondo, Sonoko
    Yamamoto, Takehisa
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2023, 221
  • [27] Classical swine fever (hog cholera) in wild boar in Europe
    Artois, M
    Depner, KR
    Guberti, V
    Hars, J
    Rossi, S
    Rutili, D
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2002, 21 (02): : 287 - 303
  • [28] Role of Wild Boar in the Spread of Classical Swine Fever in Japan
    Ito, Satoshi
    Jurado, Cristina
    Bosch, Jaime
    Ito, Mitsugi
    Sanchez-Vizcaino, Jose Manuel
    Isoda, Norikazu
    Sakoda, Yoshihiro
    PATHOGENS, 2019, 8 (04):
  • [29] Two outbreaks of classical swine fever in wild boar in France
    Pol, F.
    Rossi, S.
    Mespltede, A.
    Kuntz-Simon, G.
    Le Potier, M-F.
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2008, 162 (25) : 811 - 816
  • [30] Eco-Sanitary Regionalization of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Western Palearctic Realm as a Tool for the Stewardship of African Swine Fever
    Aguilar-Vega, Cecilia
    Munoz-Perez, Carolina
    Sanchez-Vizcaino, Jose Manuel
    Martinez-Aviles, Marta
    Bosch, Jaime
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2023, 2023