A comparison of relative diagnostic precision between the Compass fundus perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer

被引：0

作者：

Rossetti, Luca Mario ^{[1
]}

Montesano, Giovanni ^{[1
,2
]}

Bryan, Susan R. ^{[2
]}

Fogagnolo, Paolo ^{[1
]}

Oddone, Francesco ^{[3
]}

McKendrick, Allison M. ^{[4
]}

Turpin, Andrew ^{[5
]}

Lanzetta, Paolo ^{[6
]}

Perdicchi, Andrea ^{[7
]}

Johnson, Chris A. ^{[8
]}

Garway-Heath, David F. ^{[9
,10
]}

Crabb, David P. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Milan, Eye Clin, Milan, Italy

[2] City Univ London, Optometry & Visual Sci, London, England

[3] IRCCS GB Bietti Eye Fdn, Glaucoma Unit, Rome, Italy

[4] Univ Melbourne, Optometry & Vis Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia

[5] Univ Melbourne, Comp & Informat Syst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia

[6] Univ Udine, Dept Ophthalmol, Udine, Italy

[7] Azienda Osped St Andrea, Rome, Italy

[8] Univ Iowa, Ophthal & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA

[9] UCL, Inst Ophthalmol, London, England

[10] Moorfields Eye Hosp, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, London, England

来源：

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE | 2018年 / 59卷 / 09期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R77 [眼科学];

学科分类号：

100212 ;

摘要：

6033

引用

页数：7

共 50 条

[11] Comparison between the 24-2 new grid program of the Compass fundus automated perimeter and the 24-2 program of the Humphrey field analyser
Fenolland, J. R.
Chaves, M. Alves
Sendon, D.
Charpentier, S.
Manchart, T.
Renard, J. P.
Giraud, J. M.
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2018, 96 : 39 - 39
[12] A CLINICAL COMPARISON OF VISUAL-FIELD TESTING WITH A NEW AUTOMATED PERIMETER, THE HUMPHREY FIELD ANALYZER, AND THE GOLDMANN PERIMETER
BECK, RW
BERGSTROM, TJ
LICHTER, PR
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1985, 92 (01) : 77 - 82
[13] Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer A Pilot Study
Ahmed, Yusuf
Pereira, Austin
Bowden, Sylvie
Shi, Runjie B.
Li, Yan
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
Arshinoff, Steve A.
OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (02): : 146 - 159
[14] A Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry on the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer
Goren, A.
Ho, Y. -H.
Schuelein, E.
Flanagan, J. G.
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
[15] Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer
Kang, Joyce
De Arrigunaga, Sofia
Freeman, Sandra E.
Zhao, Yan
Lin, Michael
Liebman, Daniel L.
Roldan, Ana M.
Kim, Julia A.
Chang, Dolly S.
Friedman, David S.
Elze, Tobias
OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2023, 6 (05): : 509 - 520
[16] Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer
Kang, Joyce
De Arrigunaga, Sofia
Freeman, Sandra E.
Zhao, Yan
Lin, Michael
Liebman, Daniel L.
Roldan, Ana M.
Kim, Julia A.
Chang, Dolly S.
Friedman, David S.
Elze, Tobias
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 130 (11) : 1112 - 1112
[17] Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer
Prea, Selwyn Marc
Kong, Yu Xiang George
Mehta, Aditi
He, Mingguang
Crowston, Jonathan G.
Gupta, Vinay
Martin, Keith R.
Vingrys, Algis J.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 190 : 9 - 16
[18] Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer
Nishida, Takashi
Eslani, Medi
Weinreb, Robert N.
Arias, Juan
Vasile, Cristiana
Mohammadzadeh, Vahid
Moghimi, Sasan
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2023, 32 (02) : 85 - 92
[19] A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients
Kong, Yu Xiang George
He, Mingguang
Crowston, Jonathan G.
Vingrys, Algis J.
TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 5 (06):
[20] Comparing the Radius virtual reality perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer
Barnebey, Howard
Bradley, Chris
Bacharach, Jason
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →