A comparison of relative diagnostic precision between the Compass fundus perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer

被引:0
|
作者
Rossetti, Luca Mario [1 ]
Montesano, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Bryan, Susan R. [2 ]
Fogagnolo, Paolo [1 ]
Oddone, Francesco [3 ]
McKendrick, Allison M. [4 ]
Turpin, Andrew [5 ]
Lanzetta, Paolo [6 ]
Perdicchi, Andrea [7 ]
Johnson, Chris A. [8 ]
Garway-Heath, David F. [9 ,10 ]
Crabb, David P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Eye Clin, Milan, Italy
[2] City Univ London, Optometry & Visual Sci, London, England
[3] IRCCS GB Bietti Eye Fdn, Glaucoma Unit, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Melbourne, Optometry & Vis Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Comp & Informat Syst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Udine, Dept Ophthalmol, Udine, Italy
[7] Azienda Osped St Andrea, Rome, Italy
[8] Univ Iowa, Ophthal & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
[9] UCL, Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[10] Moorfields Eye Hosp, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, London, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
6033
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer
    Montesano, Giovanni
    Bryan, Susan R.
    Crabb, David P.
    Fogagnolo, Paolo
    Oddone, Francesco
    McKendrick, Allison M.
    Turpin, Andrew
    Lanzetta, Paolo
    Perdicchi, Andrea
    Johnson, Chris A.
    Garway-Heath, David F.
    Brusini, Paolo
    Rossetti, Luca M.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 126 (02) : 242 - 251
  • [2] Agreement between Compass Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer measurements
    Ghahari, Elham
    Bowd, Christopher
    Zangwill, Linda M.
    Proudfoot, James
    Penteado, Rafaella
    Hou, Huiyuan
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [3] Comparison of the TEMPO binocular perimeter and Humphrey field analyzer
    Takashi Nishida
    Robert N. Weinreb
    Juan Arias
    Cristiana Vasile
    Sasan Moghimi
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [4] Comparison of a portable perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer in Telemedicine
    Antwi-Adjei, Ellen
    Swain, Thomas
    Racette, Lyne
    Rhodes, Lindsay
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [5] Comparison of the TEMPO binocular perimeter and Humphrey field analyzer
    Nishida, Takashi
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    Arias, Juan
    Vasile, Cristiana
    Moghimi, Sasan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [6] Increased Depth, Reduced Extent, and Sharpened Edges of Visual Field Defects Measured by Compass Fundus Perimeter Compared to Humphrey Field Analyzer
    Liu, Ping
    Nguyen, Bao N.
    Turpin, Andrew
    McKendrick, Allison M.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 10 (12):
  • [7] A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer
    Landers, John
    Sharma, Alok
    Goldberg, Ivan
    Graham, Stuart
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 91 (10) : 1285 - 1287
  • [8] Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients
    Morbio, Roberta
    Longo, Chiara
    De Vitto, Antonia Maria Luce
    Comacchio, Francesco
    Della Porta, Lucia Barbara
    Marchini, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (04) : 1850 - 1856
  • [9] Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo®) and Humphrey Field Analyzer
    Kimura, Tairo
    Matsumoto, Chota
    Nomoto, Hiroki
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 13 : 501 - 513
  • [10] MULTICENTER LONGITUDINAL COMPARISON OF PERIMETRY RESULTS BETWEEN IPAD PERIMETER AND HUMPHREY FIELD ANALYZER FOR GLAUCOMA
    Kong, Yu Xiang George
    Prea, Selwyn Marc
    Mehta, Aditi
    He, Mingguang
    Crowston, Jonathan
    Gupta, Viney
    Martin, Keith
    Vingrys, Algis
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 45 : 23 - 23