Enhanced Performance of Bioelectrochemical Hydrogen Production using a pH Control Strategy

被引:36
|
作者
Ruiz, Yolanda [1 ]
Baeza, Juan A. [1 ]
Guisasola, Albert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Escola Engn, Dept Engn Quim, GENOCOV, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
biocatalysis; electrochemistry; hydrogen; ion exchange membranes; ph control; MICROBIAL FUEL-CELLS; ELECTROLYSIS CELLS; BIOCATALYZED ELECTROLYSIS; EXCHANGE MEMBRANE; POWER PRODUCTION; GENERATION; TRANSPORT; CATHOLYTES; REDUCTION; BACTERIA;
D O I
10.1002/cssc.201403083
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The use of membranes in microbial electrolysis cells (MEC) is required to obtain high-purity hydrogen and to avoid the consumption of hydrogen by undesired microorganisms. However, its utilization results in pH gradients across the membrane that contribute to potential losses and reduce the efficiency of MEC. Several pH-controlled and noncontrolled scenarios were evaluated in this work, which evidenced that pH control is beneficial for the MEC performance. The best results were obtained if the anodic and cathodic pH were controlled at 7.5 and 2.0, respectively, to produce 0.58 m(3)m(-3)d(-1) of hydrogen at an applied voltage of only 0.2 V. The energy efficiency with respect to the electrical input was increased up to 883 %. Anodic pH control allowed us to maintain a stable exoelectrogenic activity with practically constant current intensity, whereas cathodic pH control at 2.0 allowed a fivefold decrease of the required electrical input, which opens new opportunities for the economy of its full-scale application.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 397
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of pH on the performance of hydrogen production by dark fermentation coupled denitrification
    Tang, Taotao
    Chen, Ying
    Liu, Min
    Du, Ye
    Tan, Yichuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 208
  • [32] Hydrogen production using sorption-enhanced reaction
    Ortiz, AL
    Harrison, DP
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2001, 40 (23) : 5102 - 5109
  • [33] Enhanced Predictability of Hydrogen Maser Using Random Pursuit Strategy
    Wang, Yuzhuo
    Gao, Yuan
    Zhang, Aimin
    Wang, Weibo
    Lin, Yige
    2017 JOINT CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN FREQUENCY AND TIME FORUM AND IEEE INTERNATIONAL FREQUENCY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM (EFTF/IFC), 2017, : 719 - 722
  • [34] Numerical investigation of pH control on dark fermentation and hydrogen production in a microbioreactor
    Delavar, Mojtaba Aghajani
    Wang, Junye
    FUEL, 2021, 292
  • [35] Enhanced chitinase production by Chitinolyticbacter meiyuanensis SYBC-H1 using staged pH control
    Zhang, Alei
    Gao, Cong
    Chen, Kequan
    Wei, Ce
    Ouyang, Pingkai
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 62 (03): : 126 - 131
  • [36] Hydrogen production at neutral pH
    Canter, Neil
    Tribology and Lubrication Technology, 2019, 75 (03): : 12 - 13
  • [37] Influence of the pH control strategy and reactor volume on batch fermentative hydrogen production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste
    Baldi, Francesco
    Iannelli, Renato
    Pecorini, Isabella
    Polettini, Alessandra
    Pomi, Raffaella
    Rossi, Andreina
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2019, 37 (05) : 478 - 485
  • [38] Synchronous hydrogen and electricity production by dual-cathodes in a bioelectrochemical system
    Hu, Xiangming
    Wang, Feng
    Zhao, Yanyun
    Li, Xiao
    Liu, Jindi
    Zhai, Mulan
    Wang, Qingshan
    Wang, Jingqian
    Wang, Wei
    Liu, Rongxin
    Dong, Ha
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [39] Ammonia as carbon-free substrate for hydrogen production in bioelectrochemical systems
    Zhan, Guoqiang
    Li, Daping
    Tao, Yong
    Zhu, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Lixia
    Wang, Yujian
    He, Xiaohong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (23) : 11854 - 11859
  • [40] Metal link: A strategy to combine graphene and titanium dioxide for enhanced hydrogen production
    Wang, Zhouyou
    Yin, Yichun
    Williams, Tim
    Wang, Huanting
    Sun, Chenghua
    Zhang, Xiwang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (47) : 22034 - 22042