ESTIMATION OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY DOSE INDEX IN CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: MOSFET MEASUREMENTS AND MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS

被引:12
|
作者
Kim, Sangroh [2 ]
Yoshizumi, Terry [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Toncheva, Greta [1 ,3 ]
Yoo, Sua [4 ]
Yin, Fang-Fang [4 ]
Frush, Donald [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Radiat Safety, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Phys Grad Program, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2010年 / 98卷 / 05期
关键词
computed tomography; medical radiation; dose assessment; Monte Carlo; FLAT-PANEL IMAGER; RADIATION-THERAPY; CT; CBCT;
D O I
10.1097/HP.0b013e3181cd3ec3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To address the lack of accurate dose estimation method in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), we performed point dose metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) measurements and Monte Carlo ( MC) simulations. A Varian On-Board Imager (R) (OBI) was employed to measure point doses in the polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) CT phantoms with MOSFETs for standard and low dose modes. A MC model of the OBI x-ray tube was developed using BEAMnrc/EGSnrc MC system and validated by the half value layer, x-ray spectrum and lateral and depth dose profiles. We compared the weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIw) between MOSFET measurements and MC simulations. The CTDIw was found to be 8.39 cGy for the head scan and 4.58 cGy for the body scan from the MOSFET measurements in standard dose mode, and 1.89 cGy for the head and 1.11 cGy for the body in low dose mode, respectively. The CTDIw from MC compared well to the MOSFET measurements within 5% differences. In conclusion, a MC model for Varian CBCT has been established and this approach may be easily extended from the CBCT geometry to multi-detector CT geometry. Health Phys. 98(5):683-691; 2010
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 691
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measurements of computed tomography dose index for clinical scans
    Trevisan, D.
    Ravanelli, D.
    Valentini, A.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2014, 158 (04) : 389 - 398
  • [32] An evaluation of techniques for dose calculation on cone beam computed tomography
    Giacometti, Valentina
    King, Raymond B.
    Agnew, Christina E.
    Irvine, Denise M.
    Jain, Suneil
    Hounsell, Alan R.
    McGarry, Conor K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1096):
  • [33] Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics
    Jasem Greval
    British Dental Journal, 2019, 226 (2) : 92 - 92
  • [34] Panoramic cone beam computed tomography
    Chang, Jenghwa
    Zhou, Lili
    Wang, Song
    Chao, K. S. Clifford
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) : 2930 - 2946
  • [35] Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics
    D'Addazio, P. S. S.
    Carvalho, A. C. P.
    Campos, C. N.
    Devito, K. L.
    Ozcan, M.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2016, 49 (03) : 311 - 312
  • [36] Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements
    Misch, Kelly A.
    Yi, Erica S.
    Sarment, David P.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (07) : 1261 - 1266
  • [37] Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics
    Coskun, Ipek
    Kaya, Burcak
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 31 (02) : 55 - 61
  • [38] Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics
    Dindaroglu, Furkan
    Yetkiner, Enver
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 29 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [39] Deep learning-based dose estimation in cone-beam computed tomography
    Kim, Jinwoo
    Kim, Ho Kyung
    Cho, Minkook
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2024: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PT 1, 2024, 12925
  • [40] Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
    Chau, Anson C. M.
    Fung, Karl
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 107 (04): : 559 - 565