Validation of the Kihon Checklist and the frailty screening index for frailty defined by the phenotype model in older Japanese adults

被引:28
|
作者
Watanabe, Daiki [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yoshida, Tsukasa [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Watanabe, Yuya [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Yamada, Yosuke [2 ,3 ]
Miyachi, Motohiko [1 ,2 ]
Kimura, Misaka [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Waseda Univ, Fac Sport Sci, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Saitama 3591192, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Biomed Innovat Hlth & Nutr, Natl Inst Hlth & Nutr, Njuku Ku, 1-23-1 Toyama, Tokyo 1628636, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ Adv Sci, Inst Act Hlth, Inst Interdisciplinary Res, 1-1 Nanjo Otani,Sogabe Cho, Kameoka City, Kyoto 6218555, Japan
[4] Kameoka City Govt, Senior Citizens Welf Sect, 8 Nonogami, Kameoka City, Kyoto 6218501, Japan
[5] Meiji Yasuda Life Fdn Hlth & Welf, Phys Fitness Res Inst, 150 Tobukimachi, Hachioji, Tokyo 1920001, Japan
[6] Doshisha Womens Coll Liberal Arts, Dept Nursing, 97-1 Minamihokotate, Kyotanabe, Kyoto 6100395, Japan
[7] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Lab Appl Hlth Sci, Kamigyo Ku, 465 Kajii Cho, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
关键词
Frailty; Accuracy; Screening tool; Validation; Phenotype model; CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; ACCUMULATION; INSTRUMENTS; PREVALENCE; VERSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-022-03177-2
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background The term "frailty" might appear simple, but the methods used to assess it differ among studies. Consequently, there is inconsistency in the classification of frailty and predictive capacity depending on the frailty assessment method utilised. We aimed to examine the diagnostic accuracy of several screening tools for frailty defined by the phenotype model in older Japanese adults. Methods This cross-sectional study included 1,306 older Japanese adults aged >= 65 years who underwent physical check-up by cluster random sampling as part of the Kyoto-Kameoka Study in Japan. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of several screening instruments for frailty using the revised Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria as the reference standard. These criteria are based on the Fried phenotype model and include five elements: unintentional weight loss, weakness (grip strength), exhaustion, slowness (normal gait speed), and low physical activity. The Kihon Checklist (KCL), frailty screening index (FSI), and self-reported health were evaluated using mailed surveys. We calculated the non-parametric area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) for several screening tools against the reference standard. Results The participants' mean (standard deviation) age was 72.8 (5.5) years. The prevalence of frailty based on the Fried phenotype model was 12.2% in women and 10.3% in men. The AUC ROC was 0.861 (95% confidence interval: 0.832-0.889) for KCL, 0.860 (0.831-0.889) for FSI, and 0.668 (0.629-0.707) for self-reported health. The cut-off for identifying frail individuals was >= 7 points in the KCL and >= 2 points in the FSI. Conclusions Our results indicated that the two instruments (KCL and FSI) had sufficient diagnostic accuracy for frailty based on the phenotype model for older Japanese adults. This may be useful for the early detection of frailty in high-risk older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current Situation of Frailty Screening Tools for Older Adults
    Ma, L.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2019, 23 (01): : 111 - 118
  • [42] Frailty 5 Checklist Teaching primary care of frail older adults
    Freedman, Amy
    McDougall, Lorna
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2019, 65 (01) : 74 - 76
  • [43] Development of a Fried Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire for Use in Screening Community-Dwelling Older Adults
    Chen, Si
    Chen, Tao
    Kishimoto, Hiro
    Susaki, Yasuo
    Kumagai, Shuzo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (02) : 272 - +
  • [44] Questionnaire for Medical Checkup of Old-Old is non-inferior to the Kihon Checklist in screening frailty among independent older adults aged 75 years and older: The Itabashi Longitudinal Study on Aging
    Deguchi, Naoki
    Osuka, Yosuke
    Kojima, Narumi
    Motokawa, Keiko
    Iwasaki, Masanori
    Inagaki, Hiroki
    Miyamae, Fumiko
    Okamura, Tsuyoshi
    Hirano, Hirohiko
    Awata, Shuichi
    Sasai, Hiroyuki
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 24 : 176 - 181
  • [45] Frailty Trajectories and Its Associated Factors in Japanese Older Adults
    Taniguchi, Y.
    Kitamura, A.
    Hata, T.
    Fujita, K.
    Abe, T.
    Nofuji, Y.
    Seino, S.
    Yokoyama, Y.
    Shinkai, S.
    Fujiwara, Y.
    JOURNAL OF FRAILTY & AGING, 2024, 13 (03): : 233 - 239
  • [46] Internet use patterns and their relationship with frailty in older Japanese adults
    Yaya Li
    Kayo Godai
    Michiko Kido
    Susumu Komori
    Ryoichi Shima
    Kei Kamide
    Mai Kabayama
    BMC Geriatrics, 25 (1)
  • [47] Validation of a frailty index in older cancer patients with solid tumours
    McCarthy, A. L.
    Peel, N. M.
    Gillespie, K. M.
    Berry, R.
    Walpole, E.
    Yates, P.
    Hubbard, R. E.
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [48] Frailty screening in older adults: is annual screening necessary in primary care?
    Lee, Linda
    Jones, Aaron
    Hillier, Loretta M.
    Costa, Andrew
    Patel, Tejal
    Parikh, Ruchi
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2022, 39 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [49] Validation of a frailty index in older cancer patients with solid tumours
    A. L. McCarthy
    N. M. Peel
    K. M. Gillespie
    R. Berry
    E. Walpole
    P. Yates
    R. E. Hubbard
    BMC Cancer, 18
  • [50] Characteristics of meaningful activities in community-dwelling Japanese older adults with pre-frailty and frailty
    Maruta, Michio
    Makizako, Hyuma
    Ikeda, Yuriko
    Han, Gwanghee
    Shimokihara, Suguru
    Miyata, Hironori
    Nakamura, Atsushi
    Tokuda, Keiichiro
    Kubozono, Takuro
    Ohishi, Mitsuru
    Tomori, Kounosuke
    Akaida, Shoma
    Tabira, Takayuki
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2022, 99