共 50 条
Validation of the Kihon Checklist and the frailty screening index for frailty defined by the phenotype model in older Japanese adults
被引:28
|作者:
Watanabe, Daiki
[1
,2
,3
]
Yoshida, Tsukasa
[2
,3
,4
]
Watanabe, Yuya
[2
,3
,5
]
Yamada, Yosuke
[2
,3
]
Miyachi, Motohiko
[1
,2
]
Kimura, Misaka
[3
,6
,7
]
机构:
[1] Waseda Univ, Fac Sport Sci, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Saitama 3591192, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Biomed Innovat Hlth & Nutr, Natl Inst Hlth & Nutr, Njuku Ku, 1-23-1 Toyama, Tokyo 1628636, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ Adv Sci, Inst Act Hlth, Inst Interdisciplinary Res, 1-1 Nanjo Otani,Sogabe Cho, Kameoka City, Kyoto 6218555, Japan
[4] Kameoka City Govt, Senior Citizens Welf Sect, 8 Nonogami, Kameoka City, Kyoto 6218501, Japan
[5] Meiji Yasuda Life Fdn Hlth & Welf, Phys Fitness Res Inst, 150 Tobukimachi, Hachioji, Tokyo 1920001, Japan
[6] Doshisha Womens Coll Liberal Arts, Dept Nursing, 97-1 Minamihokotate, Kyotanabe, Kyoto 6100395, Japan
[7] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Lab Appl Hlth Sci, Kamigyo Ku, 465 Kajii Cho, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
关键词:
Frailty;
Accuracy;
Screening tool;
Validation;
Phenotype model;
CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH;
CLINICAL-PRACTICE;
ACCUMULATION;
INSTRUMENTS;
PREVALENCE;
VERSION;
D O I:
10.1186/s12877-022-03177-2
中图分类号:
R592 [老年病学];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
100203 ;
摘要:
Background The term "frailty" might appear simple, but the methods used to assess it differ among studies. Consequently, there is inconsistency in the classification of frailty and predictive capacity depending on the frailty assessment method utilised. We aimed to examine the diagnostic accuracy of several screening tools for frailty defined by the phenotype model in older Japanese adults. Methods This cross-sectional study included 1,306 older Japanese adults aged >= 65 years who underwent physical check-up by cluster random sampling as part of the Kyoto-Kameoka Study in Japan. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of several screening instruments for frailty using the revised Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria as the reference standard. These criteria are based on the Fried phenotype model and include five elements: unintentional weight loss, weakness (grip strength), exhaustion, slowness (normal gait speed), and low physical activity. The Kihon Checklist (KCL), frailty screening index (FSI), and self-reported health were evaluated using mailed surveys. We calculated the non-parametric area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) for several screening tools against the reference standard. Results The participants' mean (standard deviation) age was 72.8 (5.5) years. The prevalence of frailty based on the Fried phenotype model was 12.2% in women and 10.3% in men. The AUC ROC was 0.861 (95% confidence interval: 0.832-0.889) for KCL, 0.860 (0.831-0.889) for FSI, and 0.668 (0.629-0.707) for self-reported health. The cut-off for identifying frail individuals was >= 7 points in the KCL and >= 2 points in the FSI. Conclusions Our results indicated that the two instruments (KCL and FSI) had sufficient diagnostic accuracy for frailty based on the phenotype model for older Japanese adults. This may be useful for the early detection of frailty in high-risk older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文