The Prognostic Value of Plasma Cell-Free DNA Concentration in the Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Liu, Hongtao [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Yuzhen [3 ]
Vafaei, Somayeh [4 ]
Gu, Xiao [2 ,5 ]
Zhong, Xiaoli [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Dept Grad Sch, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Yangzhou Univ, Northern Jiangsu Hosp, Dept Urol, Clin Coll, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Yangzhou Univ, Northern Jiangsu Hosp, Dept Mol Diag, Clin Coll, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Fac Adv Technol Med, Dept Mol Med, Tehran, Iran
[5] Yangzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
prostate cancer; cell-free DNA; meta-analysis; diagnosis; prognosis;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.599602
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective By virtue of largely disparate clinical outcomes of prostate cancer (PCA), there is a pressing need to search for useful biomarkers for PCA prognosis. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising biomarker for detecting, monitoring, and predicting survival of prostate cancer (PCA). However, the utility of total cfDNA quantitation in PCA in clinical setting remains elusive. Here, we performed a thorough meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value of cfDNA concentration for patients with PCA. In addition, we tested the possibility of the combination of PSA and cfDNA test results to improve the prediction power in PCA prognosis. Method and Materials More than six databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, PMC, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched. Results yielded all eligible articles from the date of inception to June 30, 2020. Continuous, diagnostic, and prognostic variables in cfDNA in PCA were included in the meta-analysis by STATA. Results A total of 23 articles were enrolled in our meta-analysis: 69.6% (16/23) were related to diagnosis, and 56.5% (13/23) were related to prognosis. The pooled concentration of cfDNA in PCA patients was significantly higher than in the control group (SMD = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.53, 1.26), mirroring results for the prostate-specific antigen (PSA). For the detection test variables, the SROC with 95%CI was 0.87 (0.84-0.90) for cfDNA concentration. In terms of prognostic variables, the concentrations of cfDNA were significantly related with progression-free survival (PFS, logHR = 0.84 (95%CI0.39, 1.28) and overall survival [OS, log HR = 0.60 (95%CI0.29, 0.90)]. Lastly, the test showed no significant publication bias in the present meta-analysis, excluding the diagnostic meta-analysis. Conclusions The concentration of cell-free DNA is high in the prostate cancer patients. The present study substantiates the prognostic value of the cfDNA concentration. High concentration cfDNA correlates with poor disease outcome of CRPC. The study cohort with large sample size is needed to evaluate the prognosis value of cfDNA in the future. We also emphasized that combination of PSA and cf DNA quantitation is important in future large individual meta study.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gastric cancer detection based on cell-free DNA in blood: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Mona
    Fan, Xiaohan
    Huang, Boyang
    Pan, Kaifeng
    Gerhard, Markus
    Mejias-Luque, Raquel
    Zhang, Yang
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL DISCOVERY, 2024, 4 (04):
  • [22] Circulating cell-free DNA as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Zhoumiao
    Miao, Huiwen
    Zeng, Qingxin
    Xu, Shaohua
    Chen, Zhao
    Liu, Kai
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 14 (07) : 587 - 598
  • [23] Prognostic Value of the Cell Cycle Progression Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sommariva, Silvia
    Tarricone, Rosanna
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Ricciardi, Walter
    Montorsi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [24] Prognostic and diagnostic value of circRNA expression in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Jingling
    Jiang, Hui
    Zhao, Yuanqing
    Jin, Xin rui
    Li, Baolin
    Zhu, Zixin
    Zhang, Limei
    Liu, Jinbo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [25] Prognostic value of miR-21 for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stafford, M. Y. Cynthia
    Willoughby, Colin E.
    Walsh, Colum P.
    McKenna, Declan J.
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2022, 42 (01)
  • [26] Prognostic Value of Lactate Dehydrogenase in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mori, Keiichiro
    Kimura, Shoji
    Parizi, Mehdi Kardoust
    Enikeev, Dmitry, V
    Glybochko, Petr, V
    Seebacher, Veronika
    Fajkovic, Harun
    Mostafaei, Hadi
    Lysenko, Ivan
    Janisch, Florian
    Egawa, Shin
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (06) : 409 - 418
  • [27] The prognostic value of long noncoding RNAs in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Weijie
    Chen, Xi
    Ding, Lu
    Ma, Jianhong
    Jing, Wei
    Lan, Tian
    Sattar, Haseeb
    Wei, Yongchang
    Zhou, Fuling
    Yuan, Yufeng
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (34) : 57755 - 57765
  • [28] The predictive value of prenatal cell-free DNA testing for rare autosomal trisomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Acreman, Melissa L.
    Bussolaro, Sofia
    Raymond, Yvette C.
    Fantasia, Ilaria
    Rolnik, Daniel L.
    Costa, Fabricio Da Silva
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (03) : 292 - 305.e6
  • [29] Quantitative Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA for Correlation with Lung Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cargnin, Sarah
    Canonico, Pier Luigi
    Genazzani, Armando A.
    Terrazzino, Salvatore
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [30] Prognostic value of a baseline prognostic nutritional index for patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Yang
    Wang, Kai
    Ou, Yong
    Hu, Xu
    Wang, Ziyan
    Wang, Dong
    Li, Xinglan
    Ren, Shangqing
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2024, 27 (04) : 604 - 613