Reducing liver transplant length of stay: a Lean Six Sigma approach

被引:31
|
作者
Toledo, Alexander H. [1 ]
Carroll, Tracy [1 ]
Arnold, Emily [1 ]
Tulu, Zeynep [1 ]
Caffey, Tom [1 ]
Kearns, Lauren E. [1 ]
Gerber, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Hlth Care, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
关键词
CLINICAL PATHWAY; RESOURCE UTILIZATION; MEDICAL-CENTER; SINGLE-CENTER; CARE-UNIT; OUTCOMES; TRENDS; MANAGEMENT; MORTALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.7182/pit2013226
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Context-Organ transplant centers are under increasing scrutiny to maintain outcomes while controlling cost in a challenging population of patients. Throughout health care and transplant specifically, length of stay is used as a benchmark for both quality and resource utilization. Objective-To decrease our length of stay for liver transplant by using Lean Six Sigma methods. Design-The Six Sigma DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) method was used to systematically analyze our process from transplant listing to hospital discharge after transplant, identifying many factors affecting length of stay. Patients or Other Participants-Adult, single-organ, primary liver transplant recipients between July 2008 and June 2012 were included in the study. Recipients with living donors or fulminant liver failure were excluded. Intervention(s)-Multiple interventions, including a clinical pathway and enhanced communication, were implemented. Main Outcome Measure(s)-Length of stay after liver transplant and readmission after liver transplant. Results-Median length of stay decreased significantly from 11 days before the intervention to 8 days after the intervention. Readmission rate did not change throughout the study. The improved length of stay was maintained for 24 months after the study. Conclusion-Using a Lean Six Sigma approach, we were able to significantly decrease the length of stay of liver transplant patients. These results brought our center's outcomes in accordance with our goal and industry benchmark of 8 days. Clear expectations, improved teamwork, and a multidisciplinary clinical pathway were key elements in achieving and maintaining these gains. (C)2013 NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 364
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lean, six sigma and lean six sigma in the food industry: A systematic literature review
    Message Costa, Luana Bonome
    Filho, Moacir Godinho
    Fredendall, Lawrence D.
    Gomez Paredes, Fernando Jose
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 82 : 122 - 133
  • [32] TPS-Lean Six Sigma: Linking Human Capital to Lean Six Sigma
    Narasimhan, K.
    MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2009, 13 (02) : 52 - +
  • [33] Lean Is Crushing Six Sigma
    不详
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2010, 144 (04): : 19 - 20
  • [34] Lean Six Sigma and the city
    Brandt, David
    Industrial Engineer, 2011, 43 (07): : 50 - 52
  • [35] Lean Six Sigma in HR
    Singh, Ashu
    PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 6 (03): : 91 - 96
  • [36] A Lean Six Sigma approach to the improvement of the selenium analysis method
    Cloete, Bronwyn C.
    Bester, Andre
    ONDERSTEPOORT JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2012, 79 (01)
  • [37] Lean Six Sigma Approach to Improving Interventional Radiology Scheduling
    Dowell, Joshua D.
    Makag, Mina S.
    Brocone, Mathew
    Sarbinoff, James G.
    Vargas, Ivan G.
    Gadkari, Mrinalini
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (10) : 1316 - 1321
  • [38] The evolution of lean Six Sigma
    Pepper, M.
    Spedding, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (02) : 138 - +
  • [39] The Lean And Six Sigma Sinergy
    Sokovic, Mirko
    Pavletic, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2008, 2 (04) : 247 - 249
  • [40] Lean Six Sigma and anesthesia
    de Brito Cancado, Thais Orrico
    Cancado, Fernando Brito
    Abramides Torres, Marcelo Luis
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2019, 69 (05): : 502 - 509