Professionals and populists: the making of a free market for medicine in the United States, 1787-1860

被引:2
|
作者
Habinek, Jacob [1 ]
Haveman, Heather A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Inst Analyt Sociol, Norra Grytsgatan 10, S-60174 Norrkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Sociol, 410 Barrows Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
professions; social movements; political parties; historical sociology;
D O I
10.1093/ser/mwy052
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the early decades of the 19th century, physicians in the USA enjoyed unquestioned authority in medicine and increasing state recognition. But by mid-century, their monopoly had given way to a raucous free market for medical care. To explain the causes and consequences of this dismantling of a professional monopoly, we draw on political sociology. We argue that to maintain a monopoly, a dominant profession must defend its cultural authority against rival claims and preserve its institutional support from the state. A dominant profession can lose its monopoly if rival occupations mobilize to challenge its cultural authority and if populist political coalitions mobilize to repeal laws upholding professional monopolies. Our analysis, which covers all states in the Union by 1860, reveals that the dynamics of contention, both within the system of professions and in the wider political arena, can erode the foundations of professional monopolies.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 108
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条