Return to Work Following Work-Related Orthopedic Rehabilitation: A Cluster Randomized Trial

被引:20
|
作者
Bethge, M. [1 ]
Herbold, D.
Trowitzsch, L. [2 ]
Jacobi, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Abt Versorgungssyst Forsch & Grundlagen Qualitats, D-10098 Berlin, Germany
[2] Paracelsus Klin Gande, Inst Arbeits & Sozialmed, Bad Gandersheim, Germany
[3] Paracelsus Roswitha Klin, Bad Gandersheim, Germany
关键词
orthopaedic rehabilitation; musculoskeletal disorders; work-related; return to work; cognitive behavioural approach; LOW-BACK-PAIN; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS; CHRONIC DISABILITY; INTERVENTIONS; DETERMINANTS; PROGNOSIS; NEED;
D O I
10.1055/s-0029-1246143
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Since the 1990s work-related programmes became more important in orthopaedic rehabilitation. However, in Germany orthopaedic rehabilitation initially focussed on improvements in evaluating functional capacity and on the development of appropriate modules of exercise therapy while psychosocial work demands have been less considered in the rehabilitation process so far. Objective: Aims of the study were implementation and efficacy evaluation of an intensified multimodal work-related programme following a cognitive behavioural approach. Methods: Participants were patients with substantial work-related problems. Included patients were randomized in groups either to the work-related programme or to the common orthopaedic rehabilitation (cluster randomization). Primary outcome was return to work. Analyses were based on post-treatment data and data after six months. Results: 236(86.8%) patients consented to participate. Questionnaires at post-treatment were completed by 155 (65.7%) persons and after six months by 169 (71.6%) persons. The medical performance evaluation given in the discharge letters documented a better performance of the intervention group (positive capacity: p=0.037; negative capacity: p=0.016). This evaluation was also reflected by the patients' evaluation at post-treatment. Participants of the intervention group reported higher work-related self-efficacy (p < 0.001) and felt that they are better prepared for the time after their rehabilitation (p = 0.006). After six months participants of the intervention group had a 2.4-fold higher chance (p = 0.007) of returning to work, reported a better mental condition (HADS depression: p = 0.014; SF-36 Mental Health Index: p = 0.026) and a more salutary work-related behaviour (AVEM striving for perfection: p = 0.012). Regarding physical outcomes both groups achieved moderate to high effects. Conclusions: Results of the trial confirm that an intensified work-related programme with a well-defined multimodal composition like the one presented here is able to enhance the chances of participation in working life for patients with substantial work-related problems.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Utility of Predictors of Return-to-work Outcome Following Work-related Musculoskeletal Injury
    Heidi Muenchberger
    Elizabeth Kendall
    Peter Grimbeek
    Travis Gee
    [J]. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2008, 18 : 190 - 206
  • [22] Role and Responsibilities of Supervisors in the Sustainable Return to Work of Workers Following a Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder
    Iuliana Nastasia
    Marie-France Coutu
    Romain Rives
    Jessica Dubé
    Sarah Gaspard
    Audrey Quilicot
    [J]. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2021, 31 : 107 - 118
  • [23] Clinical utility of predictors of return-to-work outcome following work-related musculoskeletal injury
    Muenchberger, Heidi
    Kendall, Elizabeth
    Grimbeek, Peter
    Gee, Travis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 18 (02) : 190 - 206
  • [24] Training GPs to improve their management of work-related problems: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial
    de Kock, Cornelis A.
    Lucassen, Peter L. B. J.
    Bor, Hans
    Knottnerus, J. Andre
    Buijs, Peter C.
    Steenbeek, Romy
    Lagro-Janssen, Antoine L. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (01) : 258 - 265
  • [25] Work-related injury or work-related pain? A qualitative investigation of work-related pain and injury management among rehabilitation professionals
    Evans, Kimeran W.
    Myers, Douglas
    Rockefeller, Kathleen
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2024, 78 (01): : 99 - 109
  • [26] Return-to-work challenges following a work-related mild TBI: The injured worker perspective
    Mansfield, Elizabeth
    Stergiou-Kita, Mary
    Cassidy, John David
    Bayley, Mark
    Mantis, Steve
    Kristman, Vicki
    Kirsh, Bonnie
    Gomez, Manuel
    Jeschke, Mark G.
    Vartanian, Oshin
    Moody, Joel
    Colantonio, Angela
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2015, 29 (11) : 1362 - 1369
  • [27] A systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work following work-related traumatic hand injury
    Shi, Qiyun
    Sinden, Kathryn
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    Walton, David
    Grewal, Ruby
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2014, 27 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [28] Factors associated with unsuccessful return-to-work following work-related upper extremity injury
    von Schroeder, H. P.
    Xue, C.
    Yak, A.
    Gandhi, R.
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2020, 70 (06): : 434 - 438
  • [29] Role and Responsibilities of Supervisors in the Sustainable Return to Work of Workers Following a Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder
    Nastasia, Iuliana
    Coutu, Marie-France
    Rives, Romain
    Dube, Jessica
    Gaspard, Sarah
    Quilicot, Audrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 31 (01) : 107 - 118
  • [30] Return to work and work-related disability among AML survivors
    Samadi, Osai
    Breunis, Henriette
    Sandoval, Joanna
    Akilan, Kosalan
    Timilshina, Narhari
    Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 96 (10) : 1625 - 1633