Implant-supported mandibular removable partial dentures: Functional, clinical and radiographical parameters in relation to implant position

被引:21
|
作者
Jensen, Charlotte [1 ]
Speksnijder, Caroline M. [2 ]
Raghoebar, Gerry M. [3 ]
Kerdijk, Wouter [4 ]
Meijer, Henny J. A. [1 ,3 ]
Cune, Marco S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Biomat, Ctr Dent & Oral Hyg, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Special Dent Car, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Publ & Individual Oral Hlth, Ctr Dent & Oral Hyg, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] St Antonius Hosp Nieuwegein, Dept Oral Maxillofacial Surg Prosthodont & Specia, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
关键词
clinical parameters; implant-supported removable partial denture; masticatory performance; randomized controlled crossover clinical trial; SHORTENED DENTAL ARCHES; PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; OF-THE-LITERATURE; MASTICATORY PERFORMANCE; MIXING ABILITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; CHEWING PERFORMANCE; POSTCANINE TEETH; PROSTHESES; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12484
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatients with a Kennedy class I situation often encounter problems with their removable partial denture (RPD). PurposeTo assess the functional benefits of implant support to RPDs, the clinical performance of the implants and teeth and to determine the most favorable implant position: the premolar (PM) or molar (M) region. Materials and methodsThirty subjects received 2 PM and 2 M implants. A new RPD was made. Implant support was provided 3 months later. In a cross-over model, randomly, 2 implants (PM or M) supported the RPD during 3 months. Masticatory performance was assessed using the mixing ability index (MAI). Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed. Non-parametric statistical analysis for related samples and post hoc comparisons were performed. ResultsMasticatory performance differed significantly between the stages of treatment (P<.001). MAI-scores improved with implant support although the implant position had no significant effect. No complications to the implants or RPD were observed and clinical and radiographical parameters for both implants and teeth were favorable. Higher scores for bleeding on probing were seen for molar implants. ConclusionsImplant support to a Kennedy class I RPD significantly improves masticatory function, regardless of implant position. No major clinical problems were observed.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 439
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implant-supported mandibular removable partial dentures; patient-based outcome measures in relation to implant position
    Jensen, Charlotte
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Kerdijk, Wouter
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Cune, Marco S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 55 : 92 - 98
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of implant-supported mandibular removable partial dentures
    Jensen, Charlotte
    Ross, Jamila
    Feenstra, Talitha L.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Speksnijder, Caroline
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Cune, Marco S.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (05) : 594 - 601
  • [3] Effect of the attachments on clinical outcomes of mandibular distal extension implant-supported removable partial dentures: A systematic review
    Zhang, Hai
    Ramos Jr, Van
    Bratos, Manuel
    Liu, Pearl Pei
    He, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 128 (06): : 1211 - 1220
  • [4] Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures With a Stress-Breaking Attachment
    Suzuki, Yasunori
    Kono, Kentaro
    Shimpo, Hidemasa
    Sato, Yohei
    Ohkubo, Chikahiro
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (04) : 516 - 523
  • [5] In Vitro Assessment of the Effect of Implant Position on Biomechanical Behaviors of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures in Kennedy Class II Condition
    Kihara, Masafumi
    Ogino, Yoichiro
    Matsushita, Yasuyuki
    Morita, Takehiro
    Sawae, Yoshinori
    Ayukawa, Yasunori
    Koyano, Kiyoshi
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (09) : 1 - 10
  • [6] Removable dentures versus implant-supported prostheses in the elderly
    Bortolotti, L.
    [J]. DENTAL CADMOS, 2011, 79 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [7] Influence of rigidity of retainers on dynamic behavior of implant-supported removable partial dentures
    Nogawa, Toshifumi
    Saito, Masayasu
    Murashima, Naomichi
    Takayama, Yoshiyuki
    Yokoyama, Atsuro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [8] The effect of implant-supported removable partial dentures on oral health quality of life
    Gates, W. Day, III
    Cooper, Lyndon F.
    Sanders, Anne E.
    Reside, Glenn J.
    De Kok, Ingeborg J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (02) : 207 - 213
  • [9] Influence of rigidity of retainers on dynamic behavior of implant-supported removable partial dentures
    Toshifumi Nogawa
    Masayasu Saito
    Naomichi Murashima
    Yoshiyuki Takayama
    Atsuro Yokoyama
    [J]. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 6
  • [10] Influence of mandibular distal extension implant-supported removable partial dentures on the force exerted on maxillary anterior teeth
    Arita, Shuhei
    Gonda, Tomoya
    Togawa, Hitomi
    Maeda, Yoshinobu
    Ikebe, Kazunori
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 65 (04) : 541 - 545