Open radical retropubic prostatectomy

被引:37
|
作者
Barre, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin Jules Verne, Serv Urol, F-44300 Nantes, France
关键词
erectile dysfunction; incontinence; localised prostate cancer; nerve-sparing; open radical prostatectomy; surgical margins; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; SEXUAL FUNCTION; NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLES; ERECTILE FUNCTION; PRESERVATION; SPECIMENS; CONTINENCE; FREQUENCY; CANCER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.057
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We describe a surgical procedure for radical retropubic prostatectornies that we have used in a prospective series of 231 patients with localised prostate cancer (mean age 63 yr; range: 46-75 yr). Nervesparing was performed in 148 of 231 patients. We insist on three points: (1) high-quality preservation of the sphincter, with the sphincter divided to keep its anatomic environment intact; (2) high-precision retrograde dissection of the neurovascular bundles in the mid-gland prostate zone for early recovery of erectile function (the dissection of the bundles is described for each prostate zone [apex, mid-gland, base]); and (3) the need to standardise each step of the procedure for a reproducible protocol independent of individual patient anatomy. These three measures will ensure the best cancer control with the best functional results. The rate of positive margins for patients with organ-confined (pT2) cancer was 3.7% (2.4% related to an invaded striated sphincter). The quality of the excised specimens was further checked by noting the frequency of capsular incision (2.6%) and of inked benign prostatic glands (2.6%). By 12 mo, 94% of patients were fully continent and 70.5% had recovered the ability to maintain an erection for satisfactory sexual intercourse without the need for medication. (c) 2006 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 80
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR CANCER
    CHUTE, R
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1954, 71 (03): : 347 - 372
  • [22] Radical retropubic prostatectomy - Reply
    Thiel, R
    UROLOGE A, 2004, 43 (06): : 721 - +
  • [23] RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR TUBERCULOSIS
    FRIEDMANN, G
    SHARGEL, G
    LITVAK, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1952, 68 (02): : 523 - 531
  • [24] Descending radical retropubic Prostatectomy
    Fichtner, J.
    Franzaring, L.
    Thueroff, J. W.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2010, 41 (04) : 263 - 270
  • [25] Complications of open radical retropubic prostatectomy in potential candidates for active monitoring
    Loeb, Stacy
    Navai, Neema
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Erickson, Bradley A.
    Griffin, Christopher R.
    Catalona, William J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 380 - 380
  • [26] Obesity and capsular incision at the time of open retropubic radical prostatectomy - Comment
    Cookson, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (05): : 1801 - 1801
  • [27] Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens
    Brown, JA
    Garlitz, C
    Gomella, LG
    Hubosky, SG
    Diamond, SM
    McGinnis, D
    Strup, SE
    UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (03) : 481 - 486
  • [28] Comparison of the advantages of radical perineal prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Sullivan, LD
    Weir, MJ
    Kinahan, JF
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 1999, 30 (05) : 352 - 357
  • [29] Complications of open radical retropubic prostatectomy in potential candidates for active monitoring
    Loeb, Stacy
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Helfand, Brian T.
    Catalona, William J.
    UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (04) : 887 - 891
  • [30] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy in obese patients.
    Le, C. Q.
    Slezak, J. M.
    Ho, K. V.
    Gettman, M. T.
    Blute, M. L.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A224 - A224