Open radical retropubic prostatectomy

被引:37
|
作者
Barre, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin Jules Verne, Serv Urol, F-44300 Nantes, France
关键词
erectile dysfunction; incontinence; localised prostate cancer; nerve-sparing; open radical prostatectomy; surgical margins; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; SEXUAL FUNCTION; NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLES; ERECTILE FUNCTION; PRESERVATION; SPECIMENS; CONTINENCE; FREQUENCY; CANCER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.057
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We describe a surgical procedure for radical retropubic prostatectornies that we have used in a prospective series of 231 patients with localised prostate cancer (mean age 63 yr; range: 46-75 yr). Nervesparing was performed in 148 of 231 patients. We insist on three points: (1) high-quality preservation of the sphincter, with the sphincter divided to keep its anatomic environment intact; (2) high-precision retrograde dissection of the neurovascular bundles in the mid-gland prostate zone for early recovery of erectile function (the dissection of the bundles is described for each prostate zone [apex, mid-gland, base]); and (3) the need to standardise each step of the procedure for a reproducible protocol independent of individual patient anatomy. These three measures will ensure the best cancer control with the best functional results. The rate of positive margins for patients with organ-confined (pT2) cancer was 3.7% (2.4% related to an invaded striated sphincter). The quality of the excised specimens was further checked by noting the frequency of capsular incision (2.6%) and of inked benign prostatic glands (2.6%). By 12 mo, 94% of patients were fully continent and 70.5% had recovered the ability to maintain an erection for satisfactory sexual intercourse without the need for medication. (c) 2006 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 80
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Pereira, Ryan
    Joshi, Andre
    Roberts, Matthew
    Yaxley, John
    Vela, Ian
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (06) : 3025 - 3035
  • [2] Is the open retropubic radical prostatectomy dead?
    Graefen, Markus
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (05) : 1281 - 1283
  • [3] Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Brown, JA
    Garlitz, C
    Gomella, LG
    McGinnis, DE
    Diamond, SM
    Strup, SE
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2004, 22 (02) : 102 - 106
  • [4] Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Graefen, M
    Walz, J
    Huland, H
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [5] Sonocystography following open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORRP)
    Lepor, Herbert
    Laze, Juliana
    Kozirovsky, Mariana
    Telegrafi, Shepetim
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 676 - 677
  • [6] Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Shabani, Bashkim
    Ivanovski, Ognen
    Gurmeshevski, Slobodan
    Rufati, Armend
    Panovska-Petrusheva, Aleksandra
    Stojmenovska, Vita
    Petrushevska, Gordana
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2023, 151 (7-8) : 413 - 418
  • [7] Radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Lepor, H
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (03) : 509 - +
  • [8] RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY
    CRAWFORD, ED
    KIKER, JD
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 129 (06): : 1145 - 1148
  • [9] Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Remzi, A
    Klingler, HC
    Tinzi, MV
    Fong, YK
    Lodde, M
    Kiss, B
    Marberger, M
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [10] Inguinal hernias in men undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Lepor, Herbert
    Robbins, David
    UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (05) : 961 - 964