Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Are Inconsistently Correlated With Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Shoulder Pathology: A Systematic Review

被引:5
|
作者
Matar, Robert N. [1 ]
Shah, Nihar S. [1 ]
Grawe, Brian M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.039
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the current literature regarding Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and its correlation to legacy patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in 5 domains: (1) rotator cuff disease, (2) shoulder instability, (3) shoulder arthroplasty, (4) proximal humerus fractures, and (5) glenohumeral arthritis. The secondary purpose is to evaluate the floor and ceiling effects, the number of questions, and time needed to complete PROMIS and legacy PROMs in shoulder care. Methods: A systematic review of the available literature on PROMIS scores in shoulder care was performed. This review was accomplished per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Results: A total of 11 studies that reported data on 1485 patients met inclusion criteria. There was a strong correlation between general function PROMs and the PROMIS PF for patients with rotator cuff disease, shoulder instability, shoulder arthroplasty, and proximal humerus fractures. In addition, there was a strong correlation between PROMIS UE and legacy PROMs in patients with rotator cuff injury and shoulder instability. PROMIS instruments asked fewer questions than legacy PROMs (9.46 vs 12.99, respectively), took less time to complete (88.21 vs 96.53 seconds, respectively), had less floor effects in both PROMIS PF and UE (0.17% and 0.62% vs 2.89%, respectively), and had lower ceiling effects for PROMIS PF but not PROMIS UE assessments (0.17% and 6.37% vs 1.89%, respectively). Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrated PROMIS instruments have varying correlations with legacy PROMs measures for patients with rotator cuff disease, shoulder instability, shoulder arthroplasty, and glenohumeral arthritis. PROMIS instruments do measure clinical outcomes faster and with fewer questions. Other than PROMIS UE v1.2 ceiling effects, PROMIS instruments have lower rates of floor and ceiling effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Spine: A Systematic Review
    Young, Kelsey
    Steinhaus, Michael
    Gang, Catherine
    Vaishnav, Avani
    Jivanelli, Bridget
    Lovecchio, Francis
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    McAnany, Steven
    Kim, Han Jo
    Iyer, Sravisht
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (01): : 186 - 194
  • [22] The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in spine surgery: a systematic review
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Bawa, Mundeep S.
    Patel, Dil V.
    Bawa, Harmeet S.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Wiggins, Adam B.
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 30 (03) : 405 - 413
  • [23] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used in shoulder instability research
    Whittle, Joseph H.
    Peters, Susan E.
    Manzanero, Silvia
    Duke, Phillip F.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (02) : 381 - 391
  • [24] Impact of NIH Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): Gastrointestinal Measures on Patient Outcomes
    Almario, Christopher
    Chey, William D.
    Khanna, Dinesh
    Whitman, Cynthia B.
    Fuller, Garth
    Reid, Mark
    Bolus, Roger
    Dennis, Buddy
    Encarnacion, Rey
    Martinez, Bibiana
    Soares, Jennifer
    Modi, Rushaba
    Agarwal, Nikhil
    Lee, Aaron
    Kubomoto, Scott
    Sharma, Gobind
    Bolus, Sally
    Spiegel, Brennan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S944 - S945
  • [25] Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) versus patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)Is there a difference?
    Jokstad, Asbjorn
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 4 (03): : 61 - 62
  • [26] Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Barello, Serena
    Anderson, Gloria
    Bosio, Caterina
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Leo, Donato G.
    Lobban, Trudie C. A.
    Trevisan, Caterina
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [27] Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in melanoma clinical quality registries: a systematic review
    Blood, Zachary
    Anh Tran
    Caleo, Lauren
    Saw, Robyn
    Dieng, Mbathio
    Shackleton, Mark
    Soyer, H. Peter
    Arnold, Chris
    Mann, Graham J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [28] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Tools for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes in Children With Juvenile Arthritis
    Brandon, Timothy G.
    Becker, Brandon D.
    Bevans, Katherine B.
    Weiss, Pamela F.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2017, 69 (03) : 393 - 402
  • [29] THE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM IN SPANISH
    Arnold, B. J.
    Correia, H.
    Perez, B.
    Lent, L.
    Cella, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A711 - A711
  • [30] Survival Endpoints: Patient-Reported Experience Measures and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Quality Indicators for Outcomes
    Chacko, B.
    Jose, N.
    Kainickal, C. T.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 39