Rehabilitation Definition for Research Purposes. A Global Stakeholders' Initiative by Cochrane Rehabilitation

被引:0
|
作者
Negrini, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
Selb, Melissa [3 ,4 ]
Kiekens, Carlotte [5 ]
Todhunter-Brown, Alex [6 ]
Arienti, Chiara [7 ]
Stucki, Gerold [3 ,4 ,8 ]
Meyer, Thorsten [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ La Statale, Dept Biomed Surg & Dent Sci, Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
[3] Swiss Parapleg Res, Nottwil, Switzerland
[4] ICF Res Branch, Nottwil, Switzerland
[5] IRCCS MultiMed, Milan, Italy
[6] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Nursing Midwifery & Allied Hlth Profess Res Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] IRCCS Fdn Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
[8] Univ Luzern, Dept Hlth Sci & Med, Luzern, Switzerland
[9] Bielefeld Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
rehabilitation; evidence-based medicine; clinical trial; PROVISORY DEFINITION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1177/15459683221093587
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Since its foundation, Cochrane Rehabilitation has faced challenges with rehabilitation definitions because existing definitions did not indicate what rehabilitation includes and what it excludes. We aimed to develop a comprehensive and shared rehabilitation definition for research purposes to: (1) support the conduct of primary studies and systematic reviews, and (2) identify relevant systematic reviews for knowledge translation purposes. We performed a multimodal study including seven preliminary research and discussion papers, four Consensus Meetings, and three Delphi rounds with 80 rehabilitation stakeholders. The Delphi Study aimed to obtain agreement, refine and complete the items composing the definition and meanings of rehabilitation. These stakeholders covered 5 continents, representing 11 global and continental rehabilitation organizations, 11 scientific journals, 4 Cochrane Networks, and 3 Cochrane Groups, and included invited experts, and representatives of low middle-income countries and consumers. We had a 70% to 82.5% response rate to the three Delphi rounds, during which participants responded to all items (100%) and provided relevant comments (range 5.5-50% per item). This participation led to several refinements to the rehabilitation definition through three preliminary versions, and the final items reached an agreement between 88.9% and 100%. We structured the definition using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework. We concluded that "In a health care context," rehabilitation is defined as a "multimodal, person-centered, collaborative process" (Intervention-general), including interventions targeting a person's "capacity (by addressing body structures, functions, and activities/participation) and/or contextual factors related to performance" (Intervention-specific) with the goal of "optimizing" the "functioning" (Outcome) of "persons with health conditions currently experiencing disability or likely to experience disability, or persons with disability" (Population). Rehabilitation requires that all the items of the definition are satisfied. We defined a "rehabilitation intervention" as "any intervention provided within the rehabilitation process." We developed a rehabilitation definition for research purposes achieving a broad agreement with global stakeholders. This definition provides explicit criteria to define rehabilitation. Using the proposed definition will improve rehabilitation research by standardizing the description of interventions. Our definition may require revision in the future, as further research enhances understanding and communication of the essence and complexity of rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 414
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Engaging with stakeholders in a research programme to promote implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation in Bangladesh: Challenges and opportunities
    Habib, G. M. Monsur
    Uzzaman, Md. Nazim
    Malik, Poonam
    Rabinovich, Roberto
    Uddin, Aftab
    Alam, S. M. Rowshan
    Williams, Sian
    Pinnock, Hilary
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [32] Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts
    Camden, Chantal
    Shikako-Thomas, Keiko
    Tram Nguyen
    Graham, Emma
    Thomas, Aliki
    Sprung, Jennifer
    Morris, Christopher
    Russell, Dianne J.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (14-15) : 1390 - 1400
  • [33] Guest editorial - The new freedom initiative and its impact on disability and rehabilitation research
    Tingus, SJ
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 40 (03): : VII - X
  • [34] Global Health: Where Do Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Research Fit?
    Nixon, Stephanie A.
    Hunt, Matthew
    PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2015, 67 (03) : 217 - +
  • [35] Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD According to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Categories
    Alfarroba, Sara
    Rodrigues, Fatima
    Papoila, Ana Luisa
    Santos, Ana Filipe
    Morais, Luisa
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2016, 61 (10) : 1331 - 1340
  • [36] A comparison and synthesis of rehabilitation definitions used by consumers (Google), major Stakeholders (survey) and researchers (Cochrane Systematic Reviews): a terminological analysis
    Arienti, Chiara
    Patrini, Michele
    Pollock, Alex
    Lazzarini, Stefano G.
    Oral, Aydan
    Negrini, Stefano
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2020, 56 (05) : 682 - 689
  • [37] What is treatment evaluation research?: What is its relationship to the goals of audiological rehabilitation?: Who are the stakeholders of this type of research?
    Gagné, JP
    EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (04): : 60S - 73S
  • [38] DISSEMINATING RESEARCH INFORMATION TO MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS - LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF THE NATIONAL-INSTITUTE-ON-DISABILITY-AND-REHABILITATION-RESEARCH
    BLASIOTTI, EL
    KNOWLEDGE-CREATION DIFFUSION UTILIZATION, 1992, 13 (03): : 305 - 319
  • [39] Incorporating the Concept of Relevance in Clinical Rehabilitation Research and Its Reviews May Improve Uptake by Stakeholders
    Pomeroy, J. Mary Louise
    Sanchez, Jonathan O.
    Cai, Cindy
    Garfinkel, Steven
    Cote, Pierre
    Frontera, Walter R.
    Gerber, Lynn H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2022, 101 (08) : 775 - 781
  • [40] This Cochrane Review is closed: deciding what constitutes enough research and where next for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD
    Lacasse, Yves
    Cates, Christopher J.
    McCarthy, Bernard
    Welsh, Emma J.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (11):