Temporal changes and clinical significance of peridevice leak following left atrial appendage occlusion with Amplatzer devices

被引:16
|
作者
Korsholm, Kasper [1 ]
Jensen, Jesper M. [1 ]
Norgaard, Bjarne L. [1 ]
Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 99, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
关键词
CLLA-closure; left atrial appendage; SHDI-structural heart disease intervention; STR-stroke; TTE; TEE; THROMBUS; CLOSURE; IMPACT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; SURVEILLANCE; ANGIOGRAPHY; WATCHMAN; REGISTRY;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.30178
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The natural history of peridevice leak (PDL) following left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is unknown. This study sought to investigate changes of PDL from 2 until 12 months after LAAO, using cardiac computed tomography (CT), and to assess the potential association between persistent PDL and clinical outcomes Methods Single-center observational study of Amplatzer LAAO implants between 2010 and 2017 (n = 206). Patients with 2 and 12 months cardiac CT were included in the study (n = 153). Images were blindly analyzed. PDL was characterized by frequency and size at the device disc, lobe, and left atrial appendage contrast patency. Patients were followed for the composite outcome of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, or all-cause death. Median follow up from LAAO was 3.1 (2.3-4.3) years. Results Contrast patency was present in 101 (66%) and 72 (47%) (p < 0.001) at 2 and 12 months, respectively. PDL was identified at the disc in 103 (67%) patients at 2 months versus 93 (61%) at 12 months (p = 0.08), and at the lobe in 29 (19%) at both time points. PDL area at the disc did not change significantly over time, increment $\unicode{x02206}$ area: -8.95 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: -18.9; 1.01) p = 0.08. Permanent atrial fibrillation was independently associated with persistent PDL. Persistent versus no PDL was associated with a 62% worse clinical outcome, however not statistically significant, hazard ratio (HR): 1.62 (95% CI: 0.9-2.93), p = 0.11. Conclusion Persistent PDL was frequently observed following LAAO with Amplatzer devices. The PDL frequency and size appeared unchanged between 2 and 12 months. Persistent PDL was not significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes, yet this needs further delineation in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2079
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Overview of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices
    Feldmann, Kyle J.
    Arshi, Arash
    Yakubov, Steven J.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (04) : 1 - 8
  • [32] An Overview of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices
    Kyle J. Feldmann
    Arash Arshi
    Steven J. Yakubov
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2015, 17
  • [33] Significance of the Learning Curve in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion with Two Different Devices
    Cruz-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    Perez-Rivera, Angel
    Lopez-Jimenez, Rosana
    Rodriguez-Collado, Javier
    Martin-Moreiras, Javier
    Cascon, Manuel
    Arribas, Antonio
    Carlos Gomez, Jose
    Maree, Andrew O.
    Martin-Luengo, Candido
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 83 (04) : 642 - 646
  • [34] Percutaneous Occlusion of Left Atrial Appendage with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug™ in Atrial Fibrillation
    Montenegro, Marcio Jose
    Quintella, Edgard Freitas
    Damonte, Anibal
    Sabino, Hugo de Castro
    Zajdenverg, Ricardo
    Laufer, Gustavo Pinaud
    Amorim, Bernardo
    Duque Estrada, Andre Pereira
    Yugcha Armas, Cristian Paul
    Sterque, Aline
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2012, 98 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [35] Case report: percutaneous closure of residual leak following left atrial appendage occlusion
    Suradi, Hussam S.
    Park, Jeffrey
    Poulin, Marie-France
    Kavinsky, Clifford J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2020, 4 (04) : 1 - 4
  • [36] INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE AMPLATZER CARDIAC PLUG FOR LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION
    Meerkin, David
    Butnaru, Adi
    Dratva, Dmitri
    Tzivoni, Dan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (14) : E1684 - E1684
  • [37] Amplatzer Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Through a Patent Foramen Ovale
    Koermendy, Dezsoe
    Nietlispach, Fabian
    Shakir, Samera
    Gloekler, Steffen
    Wenaweser, Peter
    Windecker, Stephan
    Khattab, Ahmed A.
    Meier, Bernhard
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 84 (07) : 1190 - 1196
  • [38] Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Amplatzer Amulet: update on device sizing
    Xavier Freixa
    Adel Aminian
    Apostolos Tzikas
    Jacqueline Saw
    Jens-Erick Nielsen-Kudsk
    Alexander Ghanem
    Boris Schmidt
    David Hildick-Smith
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2020, 59 : 71 - 78
  • [39] Early safety of the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug™ for left atrial appendage occlusion
    Meerkin, David
    Butnaru, Adi
    Dratva, Dmitry
    Bertrand, Olivier F.
    Tzivoni, Dan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 168 (04) : 3920 - 3925
  • [40] Early Safety of the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug™ for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
    Meerkin, David
    Butnaru, Adi
    Dratva, Dmitry
    Bertrand, Olivier
    Tzivoni, Dan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (17) : B223 - B223