Multi-Criteria Analysis of Electric Vans for City Logistics

被引:89
|
作者
Watrobski, Jaroslaw [1 ]
Malecki, Krzysztof [1 ]
Kijewska, Kinga [2 ]
Iwan, Stanislaw [2 ]
Karczmarczyk, Artur [1 ]
Thompson, Russell G. [3 ]
机构
[1] West Pomeranian Univ Technol, Fac Comp Sci, Zolnierska 52 Str, PL-71210 Szczecin, Poland
[2] Maritime Univ Szczecin, Fac Econ & Engn Transport, Poboznego 11 Str, PL-70507 Szczecin, Poland
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2017年 / 9卷 / 08期
关键词
city logistics; urban freight transport; electric freight vehicles (EFVs); sustainable transport; environmental friendly transport; multi-criteria decision making; multi-criteria model; PROMETHEE II method; fuzzy TOPSIS method; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; POWERED VEHICLES; TRANSPORT; ENGINE; PERFORMANCE; EMISSIONS; CHOICE; SYSTEM; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.3390/su9081453
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Atmospheric emissions of anthropogenic origin are one of the most important problems in cities. A particularly discrete ecological footprint in urban environment is made by urban freight transport. This problem has become the key challenge for all stakeholder groups involved in freight transport in urban areas. Over the recent years, there has been a growing interest in using alternative fuel vehicles in urban logistics, including those equipped with electric drive systems. This paper presents a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) of selected electric vehicles (EVs) in the context of their application for the purposes of deliveries in cities. In methodological terms, we present a unique MCA-based approach for evaluation of Electric Freight Vehicles (EFVs). A successful attempt is made to build a multistep MCA procedure based on two carefully selected MCDA methods (PROMETHEE II and fuzzy TOPSIS) to handle both certain and uncertain data sets in a single decision process. In practical terms, we successfully demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach by creating a set of decision maker's preference models (based on certain and uncertain data) of carefully selected EFVs and provide sensitivity and robustness analyses of the obtained solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT
    OPPERHUIZEN, A
    HUTZINGER, O
    CHEMOSPHERE, 1982, 11 (07) : 675 - 678
  • [32] Multi-criteria Analysis for Sustainable Buildings
    De Angelis, A.
    Cheche, N.
    De Masi, R. F.
    Pecce, M. R.
    Vanoli, G. P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ITALIAN CONCRETE DAYS 2016, 2018, 10 : 3 - 16
  • [33] Appendix A: Multi-criteria decision analysis
    Linkov, I
    Steevens, J.
    CYANOBACTERIAL HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS: STATE OF THE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH NEEDS, 2008, 619 : 815 - 829
  • [34] Multi-Criteria Analysis for Policy Evaluation
    Drechsler, Martin
    EUROPEAN IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, : 119 - 129
  • [35] A multi-criteria approach to prioritize electric-scooters ordinances. A case of Bloomington City, Indiana
    Kutela, Boniphace
    Mwekh'iga, Rafael John
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2023, 11
  • [36] On the governmental use of multi-criteria analysis
    Gamper, C. D.
    Turcanu, C.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (02) : 298 - 307
  • [37] Fuzzy multi-criteria acceptability analysis: A new approach to multi-criteria decision analysis under fuzzy environment
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Korobov, Alexander
    Martinez, L.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 84 : 262 - 271
  • [38] Smart City Wildfire Risk Analysis with Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Rani, Rekha
    Potika, Katerina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEMANTIC COMPUTING, 2024, 18 (03) : 347 - 381
  • [39] SMART CITY EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT MODEL: MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS OF 127 CROATIAN CITIES
    Babic, Ana
    Blecich, Andrea Arbula
    Samarzija, Nikolina Dukic
    EKONOMSKI VJESNIK, 2024, 37 (02):
  • [40] Towards Urban Resilience: A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Seismic Vulnerability in Iasi City (Romania)
    Banica, Alexandru
    Rosu, Lucian
    Muntele, Ionel
    Grozavu, Adrian
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (02)